Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN -- Bush only 2% bounce

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:35 PM
Original message
CNN -- Bush only 2% bounce
The new CNN USA Today Gallup poll had Bush at 49% and Kerry at 48%, just now on inside politics. However, they said Bush got only a 2% bounce which is 4% less than average.

Anyone else see this and confirm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doosh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. ok, on 3
1

2

3


BAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why do some other threads say
Bush 52% Kerry 45%?

Is that just the Gallop and your numbers are CNN USA Today Gallop combined?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. exactly...
what is with the different numbers...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The 49-48% is among registered voters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That's great news
Ruy Teixeira says polls of likely voters now are dubious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. One is likely voters and the other registered voters
I'm guessing. I also suspect they oversample Repukes in their likely voter sample, though not as much as Time and Newsweek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's great!
The 49-48 must refer to registered voters, because others have posted 52-45. Even so, we can say Bush went from an 11-point lead to a 7-point lead in two days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, I called for a negative bounce within MoE...
...so I was closer than either Time or Newsweek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm pretty happy with things thus far...

My worst nightmare was Kerry leading up to mid-October and then the media whores doing a "comeback kid" treatment on Chimpy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. What's the average?
"average" being 6% bounce (in which case the guy meant to say 4 points and not percent, or does he mean 2% being 4% on average means the ultimate bounce is that much more negligible?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Remember this
No incumbent who served his full term in Gallup poll history has ever won re-election when he was not leading by atleast 9 points by September since Roosevelt in 1944 when he only lead by two. Thats 6 out of 7 full term incumbents who had a 9 point lead or more by this time who have won. The three who didnt have lost. Bush is now only tied. Remember back then they did not use likely voters only registered.

Caviat-Truman was down in 1948, but he took over after the death of Roosevelt. Gallup called that race for Dewey(Dewey lead in Sept was by 9). Well we know what happened there.

Caviat-Ford also was not a full term president.

INCUMBENT WINNERS-
1940-Roosevelt lead by 9.(Roosevelt won)
1944-Roosevelt lead by 2.)Roosevelt won)
1956-Eisenhower lead by 11. (Eisenhower won)
1964-Johnson lead by 30.(Johnson won)
1972-Nixon lead by 28 points.(Nixon won)
1984-Reagan lead by 21.(Reagan won)
1996-Clinton lead by 21.(Clinton won)

INCUMBENT LOSERS-
1980-Carter lead Reagan 44-40(Carter lost)
1976-Carter lead Ford 47-45 (Ford lost)(not a full term incumbent)
1992-Clinton lead Bush by 9 (bush lost)
2004-Bush and Kerry tied 47-48 (?????)

http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1252
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1255
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1249
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1252
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1246
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1237
http://www.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1234

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Also, a Clinton pollster demonstrated that the incumbent's job approval
The incumbent's job approval rating always precisely reflects his final vote percentage. I forget who it was - he spoke on C-Span. He had charts and he could lay the job approval rating over the actual vote-count and it was always identical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. 2% bounce on 50-45 prior is 52 to 45, not as bad - but not good - but also
not permanent.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Not permanent, but worrisome.
It means we've got a long road to hoe.

EVERY candidate up by five or more in the post Labor Day Gallup poll has gone on to sit in the Oval Office.

I think only one who was behind AT ALL ever came back to win (Truman I think).

BTW - I LOVE how Gallup is suddenly the "gold standard" again after weeks of being completely disregarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. golden to who?
Edited on Mon Sep-06-04 03:21 PM by sonicx
Gallup was all over the place in 2000.



no poll should either give fear or comfort. We have to keep it up til Nov 2 either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC