democracy1st
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-23-08 10:55 PM
Original message |
McCain - Palin Interview with Brian Williams |
truthisfreedom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-23-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Ooh, thanks, I can't wait to see the too-short skirt and McCreepy's crotch-staring. |
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-23-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. praise the flying spaghetti monster Palin is MORE qualified than LBJ or GHW Bush nt |
truthisfreedom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-23-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. She. Is. So. Fucking. Fatiguing. I could just scream. |
|
She talks like a religious nut, using the exact same style of language. She stretches out her sentences by repeating self-congratulatory nonsense phrases, sometimes 3 or 4 times before she comes to a period. Her sing-songy style sounds like she's talking to a 3-year-old, attempting to hypnotize the poor child with her droning blather. She's completely un-analytical. She just fills in space with noise to keep her interviewers distracted and try to waste enough time so no further questions will be asked. I think she has daddy/mommy issues... I think she had to run her mouth a lot as a kid to keep from facing the music. She won her arguments by attrition. The sheer boredom of trying to argue with Sarah Palin's constant distractions and verbal meanderings made people throw up their hands in frustration and wander away.
How can she possibly accomplish anything in politics by speaking this way to people? They'll shun her and leave her out of everything, simply for wasting their time with her uninformed bullshit!
McCain has a look on his face like he's thinking "I've got to come up with something to distract everyone from what she's saying... this is ridiculous. I can't work under these conditions!"
|
Kat45
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |
4. The network is allocating too much time on the news show for this interview |
|
Too much time each day, and going on for several days. Free air time to these liars. This has been pissing me off.
|
democracy1st
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
Kat45
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-24-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Thanks. I didn't know that. |
FLyellowdog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message |
7. She certainly monopolized the interview. |
|
Me thinks Johnny doesn't like that. It makes him look like a :dunce:
|
FVZA_Colonel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I heard she actually refused to call abortion-clinic bombers terrorists. |
truthisfreedom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. She weaseled her way around it long enough to call clinics "institutions" and suggest that terrorism |
|
can only really be applied, as a term, to attacking the government's buildings.
She just kept blathering until she was satisfied everyone had forgotten the question, because she certainly had.
I'm convinced that's how she handles questions from the press. She blathers on repeating herself with nonsense phrases that sound somewhat politician-like until she's forgotten completely what she was asked and is off on another, far more important (to her) tangent.
|
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-24-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. And I think she said that only attacks on the nation's capital qualified as terrorism |
|
If true, that should be a major story. I didn't hear any mention of the 2nd part of that interview on Keith's or Rachel's shows tonight.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |