Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Political Wisdom: In McCain-Land, the Blame Game Begins (WSJ)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:38 AM
Original message
Political Wisdom: In McCain-Land, the Blame Game Begins (WSJ)
http://blogs.wsj.com/politicalperceptions/2008/10/24/political-wisdom-in-mccain-land-the-blame-game-begins/

The blame game is beginning among Republicans, even as Sen. John McCain struggles to catch up in the polls in the campaign’s final days, report a trio of top Politico writers. Jonathan Martin, Mike Allen, John F. Harris write: “With despair rising even among many of John McCain’s own advisors, influential Republicans inside and outside his campaign are engaged in an intense round of blame-casting and rear-covering—-much of it virtually conceding that an Election Day rout is likely.” McCain himself participated in an interview with the Washington Times, complaining about the problems created by the Bush administration. Beyond that, “the candidate’s strategists in recent days have become increasingly vocal in interviews and conference calls about what they call unfair news media coverage and Barack Obama’s wide financial advantage — both complaints laying down a post-election storyline for why their own efforts proved ineffectual…Top Republican officials have let it be known they are distressed about McCain’s organization.” And there’s a debate about why McCain chose a “reform” rather than an “experience” message.

The Washington Post’s E. J. Dionne Jr. also notes the Republican infighting, writing “here’s what’s revealing about how divided they are: The critics of John McCain and the critics of Sarah Palin represent entirely different camps. One set of critics, skeptical social conservatives, are precisely the people McCain was trying to mollify by picking Palin as his running mate…That McCain felt a need to make such an outlandishly risky choice speaks to how insecure his hold was on the core Republican vote. A candidate is supposed to rally the base during the primaries and reach out to the middle at election time. McCain got it backward, and it’s hurting him.” Palin’s favorability among independents has taken a plunge, meaning all her help energizing the conservative base has been offset by losing the middle ground folks.

As for the pro-Palin conservatives, they’re “still impatient with McCain for not being tough enough — as if he has not run one of the most negative campaigns in recent history. This camp believes that if McCain only shouted the names ‘Bill Ayers’ and ‘Jeremiah Wright’ at the top of his lungs, the whole election would turn around.” So, Dionne concludes, “There is no unified ‘right’ or ‘center-right,’ which is why we are no longer a conservative country, if we ever were. Conservatism has finally crashed on problems for which its doctrines offered no solutions (the economic crisis foremost among them, thus Bush’s apostasy) and on its refusal to acknowledge that the ‘real America’ is more diverse, pragmatic and culturally moderate than the place described in Palin’s speeches or imagined by the right-wing talk show hosts.”

One of McCain’s problems is that he isn’t doing better in his home region of the “Interior West (Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada),” writes Nate Silver of The New Republic. McCain “has made little progress in the West beyond his home state of Arizona. He now trails Obama in Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico, all three of which went to George Bush in 2004. In spite of early declarations from his campaign that he would fight for Washington, Oregon, and perhaps even California, he never eroded Obama’s advantage along the Pacific coast, and is no longer trying.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. HEH
I read that earlier -- and just posted in another blog I frequent.

A blog that gets cluttered up with wingnut anger and desperation.

Ain't I a stinker??

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. As ususal they are too late
I am reading Allen Raymond's "How to Rig and election" -he went to jail for the GOTV phone jamming in NH in 2002- and he tells how in 96 the RNC just cut Dole loose and didn't throw their money down that hole. I can't believe that they, the RNC, is still giving him any money (they may not be that could be why McC is pulling ads in Colorado) when they clearly need to be focusing on keeping 41 Senate seats and now *giggle* Bachman is in a world of trouble in Minnesota.

Great read that book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Every time I think of the Bachman situation
I get all silly and giddy :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. btw... everybody should read the Dionne Jr piece cited here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. The right is reduced to whining "Whose side are you on, comrade?"
Edited on Fri Oct-24-08 10:15 AM by MissMarple
It sounds like the early days of Midge Decter, Norman Podoretz, William Kristol, and all their very best friends.


"Things are so bad that the internecine warriors on the right have begun copying the rhetoric of the old left. In a Washington Times column this week upbraiding dissidents such as Brooks and Noonan, Tony Blankley, the conservative writer and activist, fell back on an old left slogan, asking them: "Whose side are you on, comrade?"

This is a revelatory question. It arises when a movement has lost its sense of solidarity and purpose, when the "sides" are no longer clear. There is no unified "right" or "center-right," which is why we are no longer a conservative country, if we ever were.

Conservatism has finally crashed on problems for which its doctrines offered no solutions (the economic crisis foremost among them, thus Bush's apostasy) and on its refusal to acknowledge that the "real America" is more diverse, pragmatic and culturally moderate than the place described in Palin's speeches or imagined by the right-wing talk show hosts."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Great read
I have been saying pretty much the same thing. Palin is talk radio in human form and McCain at the third debate HAD to bring up Ayers and ACORN and say "pro-abortion" or he would not have been able to face his crowds in public. They have lost control of their information/spin hierarchy and it goes back to what they stirred up with immigration and SHOCK their people actually got up and acted (Minutemen et al) something no one expected to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Chimp screws McCain's presidential ambitions...twice.
Makes "The Hug" even more deliciously ironic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Palin Election Strategy: Yell Louder and We Will Win!
:rofl:

That line would be funny if it wasn't so idiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC