Kerry/Graham 2004?

[Placebo]

WARNING: I SUPPORT THE KERRY/EDWARDS TICKET 110%

I'm just wondering, hypothetically (i don't want to get called negative or a freeper or a pessimist or anything) what if Kerry had chosen Graham as his VP?

It may not have seemed like the most popular choice at the time, but I think it would add some weight to the ticket that one seems to only get through old age and experience, that Graham has. Plus, they press couldn't be talking about how 'experienced' cheney is blah blah blah...

JUST A THOUGHT! :)

[alittlelark]

1. I guess the bumperstickers would look different.

yeah.

[dammit905]

2. Point taken..

Still, Edwards rocks. I think Clark and Graham would have both made strong choices as well. I'm just glad he didn't choose Gep. No offense to any Gep supporters, but that woulda been the wrong choice.

[Placebo]

3. i agree, gep stinks

[neonplaque]

4. Hmm.. Interesting... but

I (WE) don't have time to deal with hypothetical 'what could have been' scenerios... ;)

[Placebo]

5. @ 1:30am in the morn is when i have time for that

heh

[neonplaque]

6. Well,

since you're responding to an Ohioian, where it is now 2:45am, who has been out of work for almost 6 months.. no, I don't have extra energy to deal with hypothetical alternative histories. :D

[Carla in Ca]

7. Mr. Graham is recovering from a heart attack

and retiring from Congress to be with his family more

[tritsofme]

8. Graham can be a loose cannon sometimes,

Edwards was a much better choice, tenfold.

Not to mention we have before us 16 years of goverance if we realize our burden.

Mr Graham could not have given us that.

[JCMach1]

9. Sec, of State Graham

That sounds about right!

[Placebo]

10. good point!

:thumbsup:

[Seabiscuit]

11. If we're going to speculate and dream...

why not Edwards/Graham 2004?

Well, we're stuck with what we've got and have to make the most of it.