Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Axelrod Press Briefing in Nevada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 01:45 PM
Original message
Axelrod Press Briefing in Nevada


On McCain: Says he's on the "wrong side of history and that's the big problem." Adds he's carrying a "tattered banner" of a "failed administration" and it hasn't worked because voters are looking for change.

On upcoming trips to Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Ohio: Says they can think of multiple scenarios in how to get over 270 electoral votes, and the McCain camp "doesn't have that advantage." Says he thinks the pace of Obama's campaigning has been "pretty brisk" and said it's a big country and they're "trying to touch as many bases as we can."

On Schwarzenegger's comments Obama has "skinny legs" and is "scrawny": Says "I looked at the numbers in California. It seems like our ideas are doing a lot better than his. It's not how thick your legs are, it's the tone." Later adds Obama is "pretty fit," says "maybe when this is over we could get Governor Schwarzenegger on the basketball court and see what he can do."

On advertising in Arizona: "We don't do stuff for show. As the public polls have reflected the state is close and its narrowing."

On national polls: "You would expect the race to narrow...there are no huge landslides in American presidential politics." Says they're strength in the polls has been "pretty consistent, pretty stable." Says McCain camp looks for any opportunity to say there's movement in the polls but "there's not a lot of evidence" anything is changing dramatically.

On whether Obama gambled while in Nevada: "He did not gamble while he was here. There's enough gambling associated with running for president. He doesn't need to go to the tables."

On McCain going to Pennsylvania, New Hampshire: "I think he has to find some place to win," adding he doesn't fully understand the McCain strategy. "If he can't break through in a state like Pennsylvania it could be a very difficult day for him and we're fighting really hard there too."

On story about Obama's aunt: "I think people are suspect about stories that surface in the last 72 hours of a national campaign" and think voters are going to put it in that context.

On his Chicago political ties: Says Obama is not a product of the "Daley organization" and he didn't have his endorsement when he ran for Senate. "It's easy to cast these broad aspersions but I don't think it's working very well... these caricatures simply aren't finding a good audience."

http://thepage.time.com/more-from-the-axelrod-press-briefing-in-nevada/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. simply not finding an audience, tho? There must be 10 auntie threads here in 12
hours. Stop panicking, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'm not panicking I'm entertained by the backlash against the GOP and how
badly this reflects on the US Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratefultobelib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you fot taking the time to do this. Axelrod always eases my mind! I got to
shake his hand and personally thank him in KC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wait...Did Axelrod imply this story is a HOAX?! Did anyone read that?!
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 02:09 PM by vaberella
I'm getting the feeling this was a hoax to begin with... to what level I'm not sure. But the way he worded his sentence and we know the way Axelrod speaks is always indirectly direct...that this might not be all that people think it is if it's even real. Huh...interesting.

Thanks for the update.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Needed a kick.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC