Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 04:20 PM
Original message |
| Obama is polling better among likely voters in Gallup's poll than Clinton was in 1992. |
|
Clinton was up by 3 points in Gallup's LV model a week out, Obama is up 10 in their current LV model.
|
| DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Clinton Had A Twelve Point Election Eve Lead In 92 That Never Materialized |
| Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. It seems that they got Bush's number right, but didn't get Perot's number right. |
|
Perot got more than they thought he would.
|
| DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Most Of The Polls Had Clinton Too High, Perot Too Low, And Bush Pere Just Right |
|
Anti-Bush folks who weren't enamored by Clinton felt it was safe to vote for Perot because Bush looked like a sure loser...
|
| Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. I was going by this... |
| HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Just counting down the hours - 63, 62, 61...
|
| Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. That was a three way race - Perot screws up the comparison. |
|
But I will settle for "we are going to win this one".
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
