Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who should replace Harry Reid as Majority Leader?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:55 PM
Original message
Who should replace Harry Reid as Majority Leader?
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 03:56 PM by backscatter712
There's a reason why Democrats are stereotyped as effete, milquetoast pantywaists, and his name is Harry Reid. He needs to go.

I know, that may not happen, because as wimpy as Reid is when he deals with the Republicans or douchenozzles like Joe Lieberman, the fangs come out when it comes to him beating members of his own party into pantywaisting with him.

But, if it can at all be managed, Reid's gotta be pushed off his little hill, and a more worthy person installed as Senate Majority Leader.

I suggested Patrick Leahy earlier, but the feedback I got suggested he enjoyed and was more useful as chair of the Judiciary Committee. Hillary Clinton would also be good - she fought a damned hard campaign against Obama, she's shown that she's got enough fangs to do the job right. There's also Feingold, though some people aren't happy with him recently, he'd still be a hell of an improvement over Reid.

Ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Either Feingold or Clinton would work for me.
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 03:58 PM by MookieWilson
I like the Rhode Island boyz as well - Whitehouse and Reed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Senator Leahy for showing spine to come out and say Sen. Lieberman should not retain his
...plum chairmanships after what he'd done.

This takes leadership spine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I agree. Kudos to Pat Leahy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lester94111 Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Prez elect Obama said we should keep JL in the caucas should
Barack Obama be replaced, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Russ Feingold or Barbara Boxer
Leahy deserves some props, but I think he's happy where he is on the judiciary committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton.
But Feingold and Boxer would also be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sadly, Leahy, Boxer or Feingold would never stand a chance of being
elected as ML by their peers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Boxer nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton has been mychoice for a while
I really think the meeting was the following question

Barak: Ok Hillary, can you be a team player as majority leader in the Senate, or should I end your elected career by making you SoS?

Hillary: Is this a trick question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Clinton -- she's a hard hitter and a good lawyer
Clinton as PEO's Majority pointwoman, and McCain as his Opposition pointman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. /signed
It has to be Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'd suggest Durbin
But he doesn't want the job. He likes his current one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabbycat31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm going to ditto Thom Hartmann
and suggest Hillary Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Whitehouse. I like this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Reid is retiring? If not it will be Reid
Trust me, any democrat who takes that job regardless of their stance on the political spectrum, will be hated by DUers alike within 6 months of owning the job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I don't know about. Harry has a special mix of luke warm moderation and lack of backbone
that are difficult to replicate. The people of Nevada like him but I've yet to see what he brings to the top leadership spot. I'm open to the concept that I'm not appreciating what he does do but I've never seen a defense of Reid that includes attributes or accomplishments that make Harry a great fit for the position he has.

Its always a "he's not so bad" or a "you guys wouldn't like anybody" type arguments versus any actually affirmative ones. My perception is that he wa picked on a mix of longevity (of course) and an ability to not rock the boat. I'd assume he's a productive fundraiser but have never followed him on that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'm not ready to count Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi out just yet
the last 2 years were weird because anytime we tried to do good, Bush would just veto us.

I have a feeling that now that we have the grown-ups in the White House we might have a chance to see some change happen. I could be wrong, I am at least once a day. But it would be interesting to see what happens in 2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Of course, any majority leader is going to be a lightning rod, but...
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 04:42 PM by backscatter712
I have to give Harry Reid the nickname "Caveman" due to his behavior when it comes to negotiating with the Rethugs on bills like FISA or Iraq war spending bills...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Don't go with his own personal voting record
you'll find that Majority/Minority leaders will sometimes vote with the opposition if they feel there is a chance that the issue could be re-opened. I probably can't explain it myself but it's a procedural move that allows a party to re-consider an issue on some measure.

Hey, I'm not a senate expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton, without a doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latinolatteliberal Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Boxer n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. Dick Durbin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. nobody is going to replace him after the success of these elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. Clinton
Also, what does "Lion of the Senate" mean? I've heard this unofficial title for Ted Kennedy. One that Clinton will take over when he retires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. Pop quiz: when was the last time the majority party replaced its leader
without the incumbent majority leader having been defeated or retired or voluntarily decided to give up the post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC