Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ideological purists from both sides are making a fuss over cabinet appointments...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 12:22 PM
Original message
Ideological purists from both sides are making a fuss over cabinet appointments...
Its hilarious. I see the Hannity's of the world accusing Obama of choosing the most radical leftists available while the extreme equivalent on our side of the fence are accusing Obama of filling his cabinet with hawks, neocons and corporatists.

Both sides are full of shit. But it does say one thing to me... Obama must be doing something right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats are always ready to eat their own.
So both reactions were expected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You would think after 8 horrible years we would learn to be happy with what we have...
...instead of what we wish we had and probably never will.

I believe America is a center-left country now and, so far, Obama's appointments seem to be reflecting that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think he should appoint one real leftist -
that would take the wind out of the Hannitys' sails about all the OTHER appointees, while at the same time slightly mollifying us lefties who never really expected him to appoint any lefties at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed. Everyone who doesn't follow the Republican leadership is a "leftist" to them. (nt)
Edited on Thu Nov-20-08 12:29 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I consider all the appointments so far as people that are "to the left", just not on every issue.
Think about it. Hillary Clinton, even though she failed to make it happen in the 90s, put the "Universal Healthcare" idea in the mainstream.
Holder is anti-Gitmo, anti-torture and anti-corporate greed.
Daschle voted on the right (er... left) side of issues a lot more times than the times that he did not.

I think the facts that people need to face is there aren't that many Kucinich or Bernie Sanders types who are qualified or even willing to take a lot of these positions. But just because the current appointments aren't as "liberal" as guys like them doesn't mean they still aren't mostly liberal. They are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Liberal is NOT left.
Hillary NEVER supported universal healthcare - she supports universal health INSURANCE, and the insurance plan she touted in the primaries is little different than what she proposed 15 years ago.

Since when is a stand against illegal detention, torture and greed the sole province of the left? Goldwater himself would have never countenanced 90% of what this administration has done.

There is no real left in this country. What we call left would be called center or center right in most of the world.

These people may be on the left end of the US spectrum, but that spectrum pretty much ends at the center, overall, ranging from insane right, through far right, right, center right, center, to center left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Liberal and left mean the same thing to most people, regardless of actual technical definitions.
I won't argue semantics, I have more important things to do.

But I agree that America's left is to the right of the left in most socialist democracies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. not just 'socialist democracies'
try any european country regardless of the pary in power.

clinton would be considered a right leaning moderate and probably obama the same.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. maybe but come on....daschle...he's is so repulsive....why?,why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Daschle is a good guy who BELIEVES in the cause of getting everyone access to healthcare...
... and he has a lot of knowledge on the issue, has spent years fighting for that cause, writing books, etc.

So to answer your question, WHY? Its because he is qualified, he stands with the progressive left on the issue and he wanted the job. Thats why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Daschle is an expert on Healthcare..... he simply is. He's well suited for that job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Precisely.
When you piss off both sides, you are either a complete fool or doing something right. Considering Obama's track record, I think he's making brilliant decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Still using that "purist" word like it's something bad to be.
:shrug:

Still using it to describe anyone that questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. And will STILL continue using it in that manner...
...because thats still what 95% of the complainers around here are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. It is something bad to be. very fucking bad indeed.
read some history to understand how bad. and NO ONE IS USING IT TO DESCRIBE ANYONE WHO QUESTIONS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC