Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Everything good that ever existed in this country came from Liberalism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:03 AM
Original message
Everything good that ever existed in this country came from Liberalism
Conservatism has never resulted in anything worthy of mentioning. So why do we continue to buy into the LIE that it has, and allow the myth of "centrism" to destroy the party of FDR and JFK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think we always drag the old with us and I hope we make it better
Just look at our history and where so much of how we do things comes from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But how do we "make it better" by continuing to travel down the road we KNOW is wrong?
We know that warmongering and corporatism are killing this country. Why be afraid to say so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Some are not bad. We need talent to fix it and also this
people who want talent and are some what in tune with seeing the new and how to make it better. It is like two steps forward and one back. I am in my 70's and believe me it is a better world than what I was born into. Yes it has a long way to go but be happy it is not the 1930's where I was born. If you read any history you will see it is an endless thing. We never get just where we want to be as once we move to a new place curiosity always shows us a new thing to go for. One thing that never seems to get better in my eyes is the endless people carrying a few things walking roads to get away from wars. I swear it is the same people just in different countries that I saw in Life or the news reels when I was a child. Now I see it on TV. That is so sad to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. We do need the talent to fix it. And I believe it exists, but I'm not sure it's being used
I don't want another thread about the SOS thing, but I'm seriously disappointed that Hillary was chosen over Bill Richardson. One reason being her votes and statements on foreign policy, the other being Richardson's diplomatic experience. And he was not an Iraq war supporter, so I would say he would have more credibility on the foreign stage right now.

Barack was right about the Iraq war in 2002. It was dumb. It was wrong. It was a damn lie. (He didn't say that, but he should have.) I'm not idealistic enough to believe we can make the world a pacifist utopia anytime soon, but at the very least, we should never start wars. And never fight them at all, when they have nothing to do with defending the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercurrent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hmm... one of my favorite "centrists"
(not a "liberal") said:

Today...the central domestic problems of our time are more subtle and less simple. They do not relate to basic clashes of philosophy and ideology, but to ways and means of recasting common goals -- to research for sophisticated solutions to complex and obstinate issues. What is at stake in our economic decisions today is not some grand warfare of rival ideologies which will sweep the country with passion but the practical management of a modern economy.

What we need are not labels and cliches, but more basic discussion of the sophisticated and technical questions involved in keeping a great economic machinery moving ahead. ...Political beliefs and ideological approaches are irrelevant to the solutions.

Guess who said this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I believe that was the same guy who said he was "Proud to be a Liberal"
He also said that errors in domestic policy could only harm us, but foreign policy could kill us. Of course anything that harms you will also kill you if you do it long enough. For example, the economic policies of the last 28 years. Right now, they're hurting the country as much as the foreign policy of the last 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercurrent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes.
In context, during the 1960 campaign speaking before the NY State Liberal Party, he said:

...if by a liberal they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people - their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, their civil liberties..if that is what they mean by a "liberal" then I am proud to be a liberal.



What he was saying then, and on many other occasions, is that if someone wants to use the term liberal, and ascribe to it a certain philosophy that he agreed with, then call him a liberal. But philosophically, and as he governed, JFK was very much like Obama. A practical man with an understanding of the world, and and ability to bring people in, and move them toward his point of view, thereby getting things done.

Neither JFK, nor Obama are ideologues. For that I'm grateful.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The difference between 1960 and today
is that Republicans then were mainly reasonable people like Eisenhower. You may have disagreed on policy, but in the end, you knew that they wanted the best thing for this country too, even if they didn't agree how to get there. Hell, I'd even say that about Barry Goldwater to a certain extent, though at the time he seemed about as extreme as you could find.

But I can't say that about the neocons, the PNAC'ers or the corporatists. They don't give a damn about the American people, and obviously not anybody else on the planet. Or the planet itself. They contribute nothing positive to this country, and after 28 years of watching their policies bring us to the edge of the next Great Depression, I don't see any point in "inclusiveness" when it comes to these crazy, literally anti-American bastards.

Going back to my original question, what good has ever come from Conservatism, and why should we continue to pretend that is the case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercurrent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Very true.
Sadly, the ideologues (neocons, or political fundamentalists if you will) have taken over the Repug party. Nowadays, a moderate conservative like Eisenhower would be marginalized, or worse. Probably run out of town on a rail.

Sorry I didn't post an answer to your question about what good has ever come from Conservatism. I have such an internal struggle with these labels. The definition has changed over time, and in different contexts. For me Eisenhower was a classic (old school) conservative. That's how I saw him when he was President and I was a young woman. Eisenhower, who was responsible for the interstate highways system would be called a liberal today.

Today people call neocons conservative, but they're not. They abandoned the classic Eisenhower conservatism, and have moved off the map deep into fascist territory.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. OK, the interstate highway system was a good one, more or less.
Though its original intended purposes were as much of a military nature as they were improving long distance driving for civilians. Ironically, Eisenhower got his inspiration to build the highways from the German Autobahn system, which was designed by the ultimate right wing reactionary, the dude with the bad haircut and funny mustache. (don't want to mention his name and bring that "Godwin's law" crap into this thread)

But it's pretty bad when you had to go all the way back to the 50's to find something good that a Republican did, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. Like trees and rivers and the Interstate Highway System, oh wait, that was Ike, the highway is EVIL!
/insanely stupid partisan mode
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The trees and rivers were made by God, who is a Liberal
And as for the Interstate Highway System, I already acknowledged that one. And as I said before, it's pretty telling when we have to go back to the 1950's to find something good to say about them. And even that was an idea they borrowed from a genocidal madman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Nixon did quite a bit of good.
Edited on Wed Dec-03-08 01:19 PM by Occam Bandage
He created the EPA, implemented the first serious affirmative action plan, toned down the Cold War, indexed Social Security to inflation, replaced American soldiers in Vietnam with Vietnamese, brought down the diplomatic walls between China and the Western world, and proposed a universal health-care plan almost identical to the one Hillary ran on this year.

If we're talking about the Goldwater/Reagan breed of conservatism, though, then it's pretty obvious they have nothing to contribute as regards government actions/programs. Their ideology is founded on preventing the government from doing anything. That can be a decent counterbalance from time to time, but it's not likely to lead to any societal advances. I consider them like the brakes in a car--you won't get anywhere with them, and usually it's best if they silently doing nothing whatsoever, but they can be useful for slowing things down every once in a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. What good there was in Nixon came from his Quaker roots
And the Quakers are a liberal denomination. Occasionally with Nixon, his Quaker self overcame his Bush Crime Family programming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. I like coca-cola. I don't think liberalism created that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Well, let me put it this way....
Dick Nixon attended a PepsiCo board meeting in Dallas Texas on 11/22/63, and before that, they bought their sugar from Cuban plantations owned by Prescott Bush and his partners.

So consider the alternative. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Now that's some hardcore sophistry.
I almost feel like applauding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. You succeeded!
Be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItNerd4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. What about Marriage? What about Capitalism? Are these liberal or conservative ideas?
What about the Civil Rights act? (hint: It was passed by Republicans)
What about ending slavery? (hint: It was ended by Republicans)

Those are 2 HUGE social changes. Were they conservative or liberal ideas?

Your statement leaves alot to be desired in defining what Liberalism is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Abe Lincoln: LIBERAL Republican
They did exist back then. And civil rights were ALWAYS Liberal. It's no secret that the Dixiecrats weren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. So your telling me that Liberals made "the Clapper" and
the remote operated LED christmas light string?

I can give you one, but not both, unless you have proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. LED lights save energy, therefore they must have been invented by a Liberal
Clappers were invented by someone too lazy to get up and turn off a light, so that may well have been a conservative invention. Plus it's marketed by the same people who sell Chia pets. Cheesy Xmas gifts? Definitely Republican!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Naw, Clappers are a mission of mercy to the elderly
One of the Greatest inventions ever that I do not own and probably never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC