Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I want to POLITELY point something out Re: Obama, Axelrod and Blagojevich

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:26 PM
Original message
I want to POLITELY point something out Re: Obama, Axelrod and Blagojevich
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 10:34 PM by LaydeeBug
On November 23, David Axelrod said that he was sure Obama had spoken with the governor regarding his senate seat.

Today, Obama said that he had not spoken with the governor 's OFFICE.

Obama did *NOT* say that he had not spoken with the governor. Yes there is a distinction. Just like him saying, "You won't SEE ME smoking in the White House" is NOT AT ALL THE SAME as "I won't be smoking in the White House".

I just wanted to point out, that while I feel that Obama had NO involvement in this scandal, this governor has been radioactive for YEARS NOW. It ain't exactly rocket science for Obama to have avoided him (rightly so) Also, there is no discrepancy from what Axelrod said on the 23rd and what Obama said today. None whatsoever.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. yup , and Ax has said he was mistaken
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 10:29 PM by ErinBerin84
Most of the newscasts I've seen tonight have pointed this out and not made much of it...I'm sure the Repukes will , but I guess they don't have anything better to do at this point. It seems like the feds have been taping Blago for a while now, so they would probably have anything on tape, and it doesn't sound like there was anything that implicated Obama or his aides, at this point (and I doubt there will be anything).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Blagojevich has had all his conversations recorded for months. Obama wouldn't play around with words
in this situation if he had had contact with the governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He didn't play with words. He said that he had not spoken with the governor's office, and did not
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 10:32 PM by LaydeeBug
see this coming. That is what Obama said, and it is not at all incongruent with Axelrod's statement on the 23rd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Do you think it would look good if a tape later surfaces of him talking to the governor after he sai
d what he did today?

Obama isn't an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:29 PM
Original message
Your point is?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. made in the OP. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't think so. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. sorry if you don't understand. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. You should be
The objective of a writer is always to convey a message.

A writer who has not done so, has failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Could you come again?...cause I don't get it.
Are you intimating that someone lied, and that the someone is Barack Obama?

cause it seems to me that there has been taping going on since October.....
so the evidence of whether they talked or didn't is there.
I doubt that Obama would lie about something so proveable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:40 PM
Original message
No. I am saying there is no THERE there. There is no discrepancy between Obama saying he has
not spoken with the gov's office today and Axelrod saying that Obama spoke with the governor on the 23rd. EVEN IF Obama talked to the governor AND revealed who his preference would be, it gives Obama's detractor's nothing. There is no discrepancy between what Axelrod said then, and what Obama said today. That dog won't hunt, under the BEST circumstances for repigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twiceshy Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
34. Sounds like Clintonesque...........
word games to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. dupe
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 10:42 PM by LaydeeBug
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's also possible
that Axelrod was wrong. It would be reasonable to assume that Obama and Blago spoke about it, but even Dick Durbin couldn't get Blagojevich on the phone to talk about it. So Axelrod could have made a false assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. oh, absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. yeah, Axelrod has come out tonight and said he was originally mistaken
which is completely believable, I would think Rahm would know more than Axelrod (about the phones calls that Obama has been making).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I saw your response after I posted mine
and it doesn't surprise me in the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, Axelrod was probably
referring to Rahm....iow, Obama's voice equals or can be Rahm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. It depends on what your meaning of "is" is
:popcorn:


Or so forth and nonesuch...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. Not really funny
Kind of an easy booger to flick, dontcha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let's all take a moment to thank Fitz for serving Bush-Co in the end ... a loyal corporate soldier?
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Come on. He did his job. There ARE some corrupt Dems. He said Obama was not involved.
Would you rather he let the Governor go and let the corruption continue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Fitz is CORRUPT. He's serving his bosses. Don't trust him or you will be sadly disappointed. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I trust him. Did you trust him during the Leak Investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. no I didn't trust him then either...he never called Cheney or Rove to testify and should have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. I thought the timing & operation were very strange. Team Fitz said they *had* to move...
when they did cause they feared a deal for Obama vacated seat would go down...I guess 'unforeseen'; which I think is an odd thought when the Feds were already looking at this Blagojevich guy through every electronic peep hole he has; in either event, a larger onus was cast out when they did, larger than a Dem; albeit an unbalanced Dem Gov frog hopping to the cruiser just one day after meeting with Jesse Jackson Jr.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/12/is_jesse_jackson_jr_candidate.php

Cause I'd be pissed if I were Jackson having my meeting linked so indelibly near to an unbalanced political profiteer, a Federal investigation, the indictment that came down as a result, and the undefined 'reason' for the Feds having jumped so hard. When they could have copped him while he was stirring his first cup O'Sanka, or half way through the next bugged phone call...

Why right then and there? I often find police actions curious, and others curiouser & curiouser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
33. Are you defending that sleaze Blago?
He deserves whatever he has coming his way. Fitz merely did his job and you, apparently, cannot see anything without looking at it through a political lens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwei924 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. They already said Axelrod MISSPOKE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. I just listened to it again: he said he had not spoken with
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 11:05 PM by hlthe2b
the Governor OR the Governor's Office.

Go listen. This is a non-issue, but please go convince yourself. Axelrod already said he misspoke and there is aditionally NO issue if you are suggesting he was parsing his words (which is what I think you were trying to imply)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Yep, he was NOT parsing words- did not talk with the Governor or the Office of the Gov. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. And as for the smoking part.....
.... technically, he IS the White House. His physical person. He can't be OUTSIDE of the White House.

No matter how he tries to spin it!!!

We're on to you son! Quit now while you still can! You're not "more healthy" as long as you're smoking.

(but we still love ya) lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Huh?
:wtf:

:rofl:

I'm drink better when i drive. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. lol, what are you huh-ing?
The White House moves WITH the President ..... if the President in in the air on Air Force One, then that's where the White House is. If he's at Camp David, then the White House is at Camp David. Technically this is from the perspective of the Secret Service, but it's the truth.

I mean, yeah, its a building ..... but it's officially a state of mind more than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
25. Well, the guy is a lawyer.
He knows quite well what the meaning of is, is........

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
29. GMAFB
...........

I can see why you ducked after posting that..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
30. If there is no discrepancy, why did an Obama transition team aide say that Axelrod misspoke?
'Jake Tapper notes that, two weeks ago, David Axelrod told a local Chicago station that Obama had spoken with the governor. An Obama transition team aide says that Axelrod misspoke.'

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/12/09/obama-no-contact-blagojevich

The Blagojevich indictment is a shit-storm, as is Fitzpatrick's way the matter is not shape-shifting, its not will nilly, it is, or had better be; all tacked down round the edges. I just think we serve ourselves no greater good by leap frogging past a process that is unfolding in the fullness of time, or...a legal snail's pace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brianna69 Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. For all the freepers trying to link Obama to this mess
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 10:06 AM by brianna69
Here were the words from Fitzgerald himself in his press conference yesterday
"Prosecutor Fitzgerald pointed out during questions and answers at his news conference that “there's no reference in the complaint to any conversation involving the president-elect or indicating that the president-elect was aware of it.”

If Obama had made contact himself with Blogo, it would have been on tape. Fitzgerald himself stated no such connection or conversation took place. So have fun trying to implicate otherwise.
On top of that we have Blogo on tape ranting and cursing about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. "Misspoke" is political jargon for I lied and got caught.
In this case though, I don't think that it was Axelrod who misspoke but his boss. It stands to reason that Obama would be interested in having a say on who takes over his senate seat. That doesn't mean that there was anything nefarious about it, but who can believe that he never mentioned it to Blago even in passing?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brianna69 Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Beacool if Obama had spoken to Blogo it would
be on tape. Fitzgerald already stated yesterday there was no conversation with Obama and Blogo or that Obama was even aware out what was going on. He would have said no such thing if there was some taped conversation between them. If a conversation had taken place between them it would have been revealed and it would have been all over the news. Nice try trying to link Obama to this mess but it won't fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. I'm not trying to link him to anything.
I don't think that Obama did anything wrong if he talked to Blago about his senate seat. Frankly, it's strange if he didn't talk to him at all about it. It's his seat after all and he's the PE. Why wouldn't he mention to Blago his preference for a replacement? There's nothing wrong with it. Blago is solely responsible for trying to extort money for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. No one is linking anything to anybody just talking but in either event you simply do not know...
neither does anybody; including you including me, now isn't that the truth? It is said, however, that the approval for the taps came down through testimony provided by Rezko; so that here I quote myself from post #30 above, the one you replied to yourself,

"The Blagojevich indictment is a shit-storm, as is Fitzpatrick's way the matter is not shape-shifting, its not will nilly, it is, or had better be; all tacked down round the edges. I just think we serve ourselves no greater good by leap frogging past a process that is unfolding in the fullness of time, or...a legal snail's pace"

And Rezko was tied to as many people as he could be, he made it his buisness...

I'm no big fan of Fitzpatrick; he's part of a republican DOJ that's been disgraced for years now especially imo after having never brought out Rove or Cheney in his 'wee goody its Fitz'mas trial' of Scooter Libby that is now in the process of being turned on its head. Though what will not "fly" in my book by 1/2, is a 1/2 defense for the insoluble :eyes: sacrosanct words :eyes: of a republican operative within a disgraced republican DOJ without even having to allude that one is aware that not all conversations are taped. Some are over-heard, or hearsay product from within the midst of duress and therefore suspect; 'hearsay product under duress' is a republican specialty and I find it important to keep these issues separate.

This Blago chump is on his own, and needed to go. That much is clear. Clear as well to me at least; its better to not be "leap frogging past a process that is unfolding in the fullness of time"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
32. passive aggressive flamebait FAIL.
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 09:14 AM by dionysus
:eyes:
try harder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. Agreed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #32
42. Epic LIAF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC