Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Agree or Disagree?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 02:44 PM
Original message
Agree or Disagree?
“conservatives — and Bill Clinton — were right about welfare as it was previously structured: By detaching income from work and by making no demands on welfare recipients other than a tolerance for intrusive bureaucracy and an assurance that no man lived in the same house as the mother of his children, the old A.F.D.C. program sapped people of their initiative and eroded their self respect.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Totally agree
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 02:55 PM by ben_meyers
And that is why an FDR type of public works program, like Obama is proposing, will do more to lift people out of the current economic mess and makes more sense than handing out checks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whippo Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agree
Obama is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Agree. It definitely eroded self respect. And it encouraged people to belittle
the recipients. It also promoted the breakup of families, which encouraged jerks to make all sorts of disgusting accusations against the families who need assistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winter999 Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought Welfare was supposed to help a person
to become self-sufficient. If you don't attach Welfare to work or income, then can't everyone who doesn't feel like working jump on the dole? If we the people are giving money (via the Fed) to needy individuals, shouldn't they be held accountable in some respect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC