Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Obama actually win by 20 million votes? (TIA) - x

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:29 AM
Original message
Did Obama actually win by 20 million votes? (TIA) - x


Did Obama actually win by 20 Million Votes?
A Conversation about the 2008 Election
    — by TruthIsAll

...
Check out the 2008 Final National Exit Poll (Final NEP) — it confirmed the Vote Count:

Vote for President in 2004:    (4,195 Respondents)

 
 
   
 
 
 
Obama
 
McCain
 
'Other'

John Kerry
 
37%
(
Returning Kerry voters
=
48.5m
)
89%
( =
43.16m)
 
9%
( =
4.36m)
 
2%
( =
0.97m)

George W. Bush
 
46%
(
Returning Bush voters
=
60.3m
)
17%
( =
10.25m)
 
82%
( =
49.44m)
 
1%
( =
0.60m)

Someone else
 
4%
(
Returning 'Other' voters
=
5.2m
)
66%
( =
3.46m)
 
24%
( =
1.26m)
 
10%
( =
0.52m)

Did Not Vote
 
13%
(
'New' voters
=
17.0m
)
71%
( =
12.10m)
 
27%
( =
4.60m)
 
2%
( =
0.34m)


 
 
100%
 
 
 
 
131.1m
 
 
68.97m
 
 
 
59.66m
 
 
 
2.44m 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
52.62%
 
 
 
45.52%
 
 
 
1.86%


How could 46% of 131.1m (60.3m) have been returning Bush voters?
He had 62.0m votes in 2004. About 59m were alive in 2008. Assuming 95% turned out in 2008, only 56m voted. The NEP is off by 4.0 million Bush voters.
And just 37% (48.5m) were Kerry voters?
How could returning Bush-voters outnumber Kerry-voters by 11.8 million? Bush’s 2004 Vote Margin was only 3.0m.
How could 4% of the 2008 electorate (5.2m) consist of third-party 2004 voters?
There were only 1.2m in 2004. The NEP is off by 4.0 million third-party voters.

... it’s obvious that the returning-2004-Voter Mix in the Final NEP is implausible. How could that be?

Here’s how. There are three possibilities:
...


Check out these Final 2008 NEP Scenarios based on a plausible returning-voter mix ...

...the evidence strongly suggests that Obama won by 17–23m votes not by the recorded 9m....



full article:   Did Obama actually win by 20 Million Votes?







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not a surprise. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The size of the "Uncounted Vote" could be interesting...
given turnout expectations in the 140-148m range.

"Uncounted" vote total won't be known until Census Bureau completes its "Votes Cast" in 2008 assessment (0.30% MoE). The difference between the latter and the "official" recorded vote is the "uncounted" total.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your methodology is faulty
as has been pointed out here numerous times. You were wrong in 2004 and just don't want to admit it. Knock it off before you embarrass yourself more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Same '04 methodology projected exactly 365EV for Obama in 2008. The "fault" in '04? Rigged election.
"Any model which correctly calculates the True vote is doomed to fail in a rigged election."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x7159446

An excellent breakdown of election night 2004 issues is presented above (see "Fixing the polls: Party ID, Voted in 2000, RV vs. LV"). Assess the integrity of the election, before you condemn any analyst for "getting it wrong". Consider, too, election models whose "reliability ratings" fail to even consider election fraud as a factor in their analyses. Absurd; such models could be esteeming the "successful" predictors of fraudulent election outcomes. See also John Zogby's Final prediction on Election 2004 that was never presented by PollingReport.com.

The success of Obama's campaign -- new registrations and GOTV effort (a record electorate, including 2 million newly-registered Democrats and 344,000 de-registered Republicans just in 28 states that track such data) -- overwhelmed both the DLC Clinton machine and Rove's "Math". And the magnitude of the uncounted vote in 2008 is still to be learned.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. kick! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC