Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are people who oppose interracial marriage racist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:50 PM
Original message
Poll question: Are people who oppose interracial marriage racist?
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 01:15 PM by oktoberain
Simple question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other than really insane wackos like Nazis and KKK, are there any such people?
Hard to believe if there are. I would have hoped 99.9% of us would be beyond such stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComtesseDeSpair Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And gay marriage?
I would hope that 99.9% of us are beyond such stupidity as opposing gay marriage as well. Alas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sure there are. You'd be shocked.
I grew up poor in rural West Virginia. I have not stepped foot in my maternal grandmother's house for almost eight years because she refused to welcome my younger sister's black husband and their biracial children (not to mention my own same-sex partner.) Grandma isn't in the KKK, and she has never much cared for politics--she's just a bigot. A bigot who makes great cookies, donates money to the children's hospital, and seems like the sweetest old lady you'd ever meet, but a bigot nonetheless.

Just because I don't WANT my Grandma to be a bigot doesn't mean that she ISN'T one. Racism is still alive and well in America, and it's not confined to the Neo-Nazis or the KKK, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. Last summer, I was at a friend's backyard barbeque and heard
an educated woman in her early 40's tell her 17 or 18 year old daughter that interracial dating was wrong and that 'people should stick with their own kind'. This was in New York.

So yes, there are still people who feel this way and yes, they are racists as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. My grandma is kinda like that. HER comment was that
she opposed black people and white people marrying because "of the children." Her excuse for barring my parter was because she "just didn't know if she could have THAT in her house."

:eyes:

She was so worried about how it would negatively affect "the children" that she shunned her own damned grandkids--including my own little boy.

Unless and until she apologizes to my sister, myself, and our kids, we will have nothing to do with the woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. I'm sorry that you have to deal with that in your own family. But
if you ever speak to your grandma again, you can point to President Obama as an example of a bi-racial child! He didn't do so badly, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Yes, tehre are people who are neither Nazis nor KKK who believe this
to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. No more than people who oppose inter-faith marriages a.k.a. mixed-faith or inter-religious marriage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Religion is a choice. Race is not.
Opposing interracial marriage for ANY reason = racist bigot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I stand by my statement. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Yawn.
You just committed the intellectual equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and saying, "NYAHNYAH! I can't hear you!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. You ignore bigotry, "One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or
politics and is intolerant of those who differ."

Racism that you cite in the OP is just one form of bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
52. OP is not talking all bigotry, just racism.
Religion isn't a race. If you want to start a topic on bigotry in general, or against religions, do so. This one is about racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. LOL have a good day. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. LOL at bigotry unless it is the one you are working against?
No. Bigotry is bigotry but racism, sexism, religionism, sexualorientationism, are different types in the larger "bigotry" category. This one is about racism.

Hoping you are staying warm and healthy this winter. Happy holidays too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Religion isn't a race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. What a brilliant observation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. So racism applies to interreligious marriage how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. See #27. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. The OP asked about racism, not about bigotry.
Bring opposed to interreligious marriage is bigoted, but not racist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. But opposing interracial marriages is bigoted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Right. Racism is a subset of bigotry. But all bigotry is not racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I simply contrasted bigotry re interracial marriage with bigotry re inter-religious marriage. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. What about people who are bigoted against cats!?! They are bigots too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Another brilliant observation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Cats are another race, I am against people marrying cats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. You know, if this were a serious poll, and people voted no, the mods would tombstone them...
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 12:58 PM by Solon
Too bad even they don't think Gays deserve equal treatment. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Oh, but it IS a serious poll.
I see people claiming that it's possible to oppose same-sex marriage without being a homophobe. Obviously, I'd like to know if people think that the same is true for another inborn human characteristic--race.

The numbers in that other poll literally made me sick to my stomach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
64. Skinner is stepping in now, so maybe things will get better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. As a product of an interracial union,
and as the mother of a daughter in an interracial marriage,
I don't ponder that question.
I'm just thankful that strides were made by those that came before me
to make it legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Indeed. As the sister and sister-in-law of an interracial couple
and the loving aunt of two BEAUTIFUL biracial boys, I wholeheartedly agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
76. The question wasn't meant to be pondered. It was meant to prove a point about gay marriage.
I'm also the product of an interracial union (Latino and White), and my niece is mixed race (Black and Latino/White).


Get this... my father, who is white and married my Latino mother, was against my brother marrying an AA. He's a racist fool. Needless to say he detests gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. GOD MADE ADAM AND EVE AND HE MADE THEM WHITE GOD DAM IT !1!11!11!!!!1
IF HE HAD MEANT FOR DIFFRINT RACES TO BE MERRIED HE WOULD HAVE TOLD MOSES NOT TO MERRY THAT ETHIOPEAN WOMAN... NO WAIT A MINUTE!!!1!!!111!1 WHITE POWER !!!!1111 STOP THE GAYS!!!!!1!!!! RACIAL PURITY AND SEXUAL PURITY FOREVER SIEG HIEL !!!!!!!!!1111!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. Yvonne DeCarlo was Ethiopian? Who knew? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Maybe it was his second wife? I'm sure he had more than one (like most of those Bible dudes)
"And Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married; for he had married an Ethiopian woman" (Numbers 12:1)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. My mistake.
Yvonne DeCarlo was Miriam.

I never read Numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
50. And Merle Oberon
was Anglo Indian as it turned out. That was kept from the American public throughout her film career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. I read a post the day other along the lines
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 01:05 PM by edwardlindy
Let's set some traps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nightflurry Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. What a Contrast to the other Poll
I wish I were surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I don't know if anyone would dare vote "No" in this one.
But they sure dared in the other one, didn't they?

Kinda telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nightflurry Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's because we're ok to hate.
There's no social stigma to hating gay people, but there is a social stigma to hating racial minorities. Why? Hell if I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Atheists and anybody in the GLBT community
Those are the groups where it's still okay to hate and oppress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. If you vote the wrong way in some polls related to race you'll be banned.
That doesn't happen in analogous polls about gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Wouldn't happen in some polls related to some religions, either
Shows you just how "progressive" some people on DU really are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. I answered the question in your topic
but that is different from the question in your poll.

So if I could I would change my answer to NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Actually, the question in the subject line is the one for the poll.
Sorry for the confusion--let me edit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. That was I meant in #11 above.
Kinda like the hand deceives the eye - lock onto the wrong subject line and you'd give a different answer than maybe the one you'd intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Now? Certainly. In 1930? Well, that's a different question.
It's easy for uncritical thinkers to support the status quo without realizing what that support means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. What about cultural reasons?
As an example... it's rare in this country to see a person of Indian descent dating (or married), to a person of a different ethnic background (white, black, asian, etc).

My understanding is that interracial dating/marriage is taboo amongst those of Indian heritage and family members will put enormous pressure on children and siblings not to have romantic interactions with those outside their race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I was speaking of legal opposition, but
I would say that in that case, it would depend entirely upon whether or not it was race that was the primary motivational factor, or culture. Would a black Ethiopian child raised from birth in India by an Indian family be barred from marrying an Indian girl? I can't say that it seems likely, to me--it would probably be fine, so long as the cultural/religious values were the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. They also still believe in "arranged marriages"
So that might not be the best example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. I have not noticed that about Indians
Is it Indian from India? Or Native American?

I hate people who say I know of one counter example therefore your assertion is untrue. But I have not noticed that about Indian folks (from India). Certainly not from American Indians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Good point.
In the UK, we'd refer to Indian's from the sub-continent as being Asian - same applies to Pakistan and I guess Sri Lanka too. As far as I'm aware Hindu's ,Sikhs , and Mulims don't inter-marry for cultural not legal reasons. That's quite aside from a similar situation within one or more of those have a caste system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. That would be people from India.
I can understand the confusion though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. Is a mother with a child in a redneck town racist for not wanting her son or daughter...
.. to have an interracial relationship? Maybe, maybe not. She could just be protective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. You narrowed the question too far. Does your proverbial mother oppose
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 01:38 PM by oktoberain
interracial marriage, period? If she DIDN'T live in redneckville, would it bother her?

If yes, she's racist. If no, then I'd say that she needs to get the hell out of redneckville, for the sake of her kids. Nobody should have to choose their life relationships based on whether or not someone else might kill them or hurt them over it. Trust me--gay people know this all too well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. you're right. And I see your point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julian_the_apostate Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. Excellent point
If a pastor held these beliefs--opposing interracial marriage--this would be an absolute deal-breaker for a speaking/blessing gig at Barack's inauguration, but it it's okay if the pastor hates fags--oops! that's too Fred Phelps, how about: likens gay marriage to incest and pedophilia. Just like ole' time religion: that's good enough for me, ay Barack? Just so you know, I strongly supported Barack Obama, sent money, voted for him, etc.--I'm no Puma at all, but he's stepped into a huge pile of shit on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marimour Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
48. DO you mean for themselves or at all? I voted no.
I voted no, but that depends on whether they would never date/marry someone of another race or they oppose anyone from being able to do that. If its the 2nd scenario then Yes they are racists. If its that they only want to date other white or black people, then no, I wouldn't consider them racist. Racism is a hatred of another race or the belief that you are better simply because of your race. Not wanting to be in an interracial marriage is not IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
54. Only reason I can see to vote no is if someone doesn't believe there are races beyond human race.
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
59. i think context is important so i voted no
personally i married outside of my culture, but i would prefer my daughter to marry within it. i guess its just a cultural thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
60. The four who voted "No" -- they have NO PLACE on DU need to be TSed
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 03:18 PM by LostinVA
edited: because I was listening to Haruka and typed the wrong thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. lol all hail the soup nazi
whats the point of posting polls and asking questions, when people answer them only to be threatened and calling for pizzas. May as well have you email me what you want to hear and then ill spew it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #61
70. There are these little things called the "DU Rules," which you agreed to
Racism isn't allowed on here. Skinner just TSed three homophobes about an hour ago who did something similar. I don't need to email you anything -- you should kn ow and follow the rules. Don't like 'em? Leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. once again
so having an opinion on something that is different to what you believe is racist. Once again i will reiterate context is eveything, just because the majority of people here believe that anyone whould be able to marry whomsoever they want, that dosent mean that everybody else on the planet agrees with them. Also i am giving personal experience that some cultures dont want their kids to marry outside of their ethnic grouops for a multitude of reasons and racism isnt always any part of those wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #73
77. That sounds very racist.
Enjoy your stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Que?
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 03:01 PM by SillyFlower
Do you mean the four that voted "NO"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. You meant "no" right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Yes -- I['m getting so confused!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #60
74. You might possibly not understand
that a line was later edited from the post. Whilst the answer to what remains should be yes the answer to what was removed would equally have been no. It caused some confusion. See post #18. Some of the no's preceeded that due to ambiguity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
63. Of course, it is.
To try to stop a loving couple from marrying each other simply because of skin color is definitely racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. No, it's not "context" -- it's racism
It's those pesky rules on DEMOCRATIC Underground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. It's racist.
There is no other way to spin it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
67. Yes it is, and that's how I voted. Everyone should PUBLICLY announce how they voted since there's
not the honesty here to either make all poll votes public or provide a disclaimer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
75. Yes. What other reason could they have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
78. it depends. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC