Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I said this 16 years ago.. and I think I was right on this.. Bill Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:07 PM
Original message
I said this 16 years ago.. and I think I was right on this.. Bill Clinton
made the gravest of errors with the military "don't ask. don't tell", if he had done a Harry Truman and just signed into law that gays could openly join the military without repercussions, we would have gone from there, and with a wider and faster moving awareness that is possible today, we would have probably had equal rights in the marriage arena in states that have had it on their ballots.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. HOW DARE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Clinton's were the first gay family don't you know :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I dare!.. :)
No seriously people make mistakes, and hopefully we can all step back an understand that and maybe move forward a little more together than apart. For reference, I voted for Bill Clinton twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. As angry and disappointing as it was, there are some
understandable factors that went into the decision.

Not defending it .. just saying he was pinned a little.

DOMA is a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Sam Nunn. Remember that slag heap? What an awful time and a
missed opportunity. When you lead, you *lead*. So much for triangulating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was in the service when he first took office
Don't ask Don't tell came after he tried to get Congress to agree to allow openly gay soldiers to serve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He could have overode congress on that one.. Truman did
That is when the Dixiecrats left the Democratic party (Thank you Jesus)and joined the Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He could have
He didn't.

The Marine General's testimony sunk any remote chance he had of getting Congress to go along with him.
Don't remember the General's name: He was the one with the son who is gay and he <the general> opposed letting gays serve openly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. No he couldn't have.
Congress was going to pass a federal law, override Clinton's veto, and take the matter out of his hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. We'd have had a federal law forbidding gays in the military and an amendment banning
gay marriages, actually.

Clinton took office on a promise that he would overturn the ban on gays in the military, and he immediately tried to make good on that ban by issuing an executive order. Since the ban was a policy and not federal law, only an executive order was required. Sam Nunn and others rose up in protest and started a firestorm, then vowed to pass a federal law banning gays in the military. He had the votes, easily, and Clinton with his 38% approval rating had no way to stop him aside from threatening a veto that Nunn had the votes to override.

So Clinton worked out DADT as a compromise to prevent Congress from passing a federal law. Just enough Congresscritters agreed to support that policy to destroy the veto override, so Nunn dropped the bill. Consequently, DADT is a policy, not a federal law, and can be more easily overturned.

Same with DOMA. That was Clinton's compromise to block the proposed amendment banning gay marriage, with the belief that it's easier to change a law than an amendment.

My own conclusions are that if Clinton had not backed DADT or DOMA, we'd have a federal law making it a crime for gays to serve in the military, and a Constitutional Amendment banning gay marriages.

I blame Sam Nunn, the sellout Dems in Congress, and Republicans for the need for those compromises. They aren't things I approve of Clinton doing, but my greatest scorn is dumped on those most responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Passing an amendment is extremely difficult
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 06:01 PM by karynnj
Consider that the Equal Rights amendment never passed enough states.

As to don't ask, don't tell - just waiting to later in his Presidency and working it out first with the military and the Senators might have produced a better policy rather than what did happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Conservative Congress would not have allowed it as they fear
that allowing GLBT citizens to openly die in the line of duty for their country would make it virtually impossible to continue to deny them equal civil rights that they seek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah. I understood why he compromised as the military had no respect for him
at all but at the same time he just should have gone over them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't think Clinton would have had the power to do that by executive order.
The ban on gays was in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It would have taken an act of Congress to change it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Clinton never really stopped caving, after that...
And his administration never lived up to its promise, as a result...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't intend to sound mean but I get really tired of people who don't understand this issue
sodomy is against the UMCJ which means the Congress, not the President, but Congress had to change the law. This isn't my opinion. It isn't something in dispute. It is an unalterable fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. interesting
as someone who defends Clinton around here (crazy huh?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. You can sound mean, it will not hurt my feelings, a good discussion
is what informs us all.. :)

I still think he could have stood his ground and brought it to the front. It would have been battled out

Truman did, it cost him dearly no doubt, but it was the right thing to do.

n February 1948 President Truman called on Congress to enact all of these recommendations. When Southern Senators immediately threatened a filibuster, Truman moved ahead on civil rights by using his executive powers. Among other things, Truman bolstered the civil rights division, appointed the first African American judge to the Federal bench, named several other African Americans to high-ranking administration positions, and most important, on July 26, 1948, he issued an executive order abolishing segregation in the armed forces and ordering full integration of all the services. Executive Order 9981 stated that "there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed forces without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin." The order also established an advisory committee to examine the rules, practices, and procedures of the armed services and recommend ways to make desegregation a reality. There was considerable resistance to the executive order from the military, but by the end of the Korean conflict, almost all the military was integrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Note Truman didn't use an executive order to pass civil rights
or desegregate schools. He couldn't since both would have taken laws. Clinton couldn't be Truman on this issue because he didn't have Truman's power. Truman deserves buckets of credit and if Clinton had been able to hold off until he had his own chair of the joint chiefs he might have been able to make things work but he still would have needed Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC