Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fonts Do Not Unmake Facts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
manic Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:15 AM
Original message
Fonts Do Not Unmake Facts
Edited on Mon Sep-13-04 06:24 AM by manic
FACT: George W. Bush somehow jumped a 12-18 month waiting list to join the Air National Guard. This allowed him to avoid service in Vietnam.

By a month. Despite lower-than-average test results, Bush was somehow given priority over others and accepted into the Guard a month before he became eligible for the draft. The records (eventually) released by the White House clearly show they he opted out of service overseas. You don't have to dig any further, or consider and more of the information below to conclude that George W. Bush did his best to avoid service in Vietnam. His best defence for this action is as follows:

"I was not prepared to shoot my eardrum out with a shotgun in order to get a deferment, nor was I willing to go to Canada. So I chose to better myself by learning how to fly airplanes." - President George W. Bush - 1990

Please note that in this quote he makes no excuses for wanting to avoid service in Vietnam.


FACT: George W. Bush cannot fully account for his time served following his transfer to Alabama.

Even when you ignore questions about why he was transferred, and that the only witness they could dig up 'proving' that he served didn't actually see him do so, you are left with the following; despite this being a major issue and the armed forces having a fetish for record-keeping, no records have been produced that conclusively proved that he fulfilled his obligations.


FACT: George W. Bush never saw combat.

Whether you accept the version that he was AWOL or that he was on approved leave, the fact remains that Bush was absent from his units in Alabama and Houston at precisely the same time these units were assigned active home-defence duty.


FACT: George W. Bush lied about seeing combat.

"I've been to war. I've raised twins. I'd rather go to war." - President George W. Bush - 2002

'Nuff said.


FACT: The White House has - at the very least - been less than forthcoming with pertinent documents.

The White House has claimed to have released 'all' of the records relating to Bush's military service. On the three occasions that they have released varying sets of records. That's three times they've released 'everything', folks. This is suspicious on its own. Even more suspicious is their claim that the records that (theoretically) could prove Bush served his time in the Guard were 'inadvertently' destroyed.


FACT: The White House also released their own versions of the allegedly faked documents.

The documents that currently have interwebbers bickering about typefaces, proportional fonts and superscript do not prove any of the above. Nor does their being fake disprove any of the above. All they suggest is that Bush used his political influence (which was considerable even at that time) to dodge service and have the record "sugar coated" in order to hide this. That they were also released by the White House - without challenge - following their release by CBS suggests one of two things.

1. That they somehow knew the documents were fake, but wanted to see CBS discredited on this matter.
2. That they did not inspect challenge the documents because they considered their version of events to be entirely plausible.

The documents - even though they have yet to be conclusively debunked - are already being used as 'proof' that George W. Bush was not AWOL. It is already being asserted - without proof - that they originated from the Kerry camp. This particular aspect of one very big distraction is particularly telling because...


FACT: Republicans supported the Swift Boat attack on John Kerry.

Knowing full well how dodgy Bush's service record was, the Republicans did not discourage the Swifites. Far from it. The Swift Boat Veterans for the 'Truth' were funded by high-level Republican donors and even enjoyed legal advice from a lawyer working for George W. Bush's election campaign.

Media outlets that were friendly to the Bush administration helped to enhance their profile and sell their story. This story was based on a pack of lies and has been debunked on a number of fronts (as opposed to just one debunking - possibly - in the case of questions about George W. Bush's military record), but the impression of doubt remains due to the way the story was sold by a willing media.


As incredible as it may seem, this system works.

John Kerry's outstanding service record is a problem.
Solution: cast doubt, use media muscle.

George W. Bush's less-than-exemplary service record is a problem.
Solution: cast doubt, use media muscle.

Take a close look at the outright lies used to distort some facts and the doubt used to cloud others, then consider the following....

Why is this important?

It shows George W. Bush was a liar, a cheat a coward, a scoundrel, and a poor servant to the people of the United States.

It suggests heavily that George W. Bush is a liar, a cheat a coward, a scoundrel, and a poor servant to the people of the United States.

Iraq, the economy, health, the environment, and the so-called War on Terror; all of these issues and more are presented by the Bush administration using the same outright lies, the same clouding and the same use of media muscle.

Even bigger lies - or concepts, if you will - (adjusts glasses, taps pipe) are used to hide these lies from the people they serve...

Liberal Media - You may see some differing opinions in print, but rarely on television. And television is what counts. Yet we are assured that the liberal media is all-powerful, and hides a frightening agenda. The lie of the liberal media makes people afraid of biased influence, when in truth it is the accusers who show bias bordering on the criminal. Those who do not work to feed Bush's lies directly to the public are actually crippled by this lie, for fear of being seen as biased. Please note the multi-faceted use of fear, when you also consider...

The War on Terror - If the war is against terror, why does the Bush administration use terror against its own people? Here comes another lie; those who question the War on Terror don't believe in the terrorist threat or are on the terrorist's side. Sometimes both. I'm here to tell you that the threat of terrorism is real, but the War on Terror is a lie. And George W. Bush is the living embodiment of this lie.

George W. Bush Will Protect You - No he won't. It's an illusion. A lie. George W. Bush himself is an illusion. He lives, breathes and survives on lies. He is the creation of a man that most Americans have never heard of and/or do not pay nearly enough attention to; Karl Rove.

You Cannot Trust Bush-Haters - My personal favourite. There are people who 'hate' Bush, and therefore lack perspective. They are not to be trusted, as they have an agenda. Their hate blinds them to the truth.

I've seen the truth, but it's the lies that are blinding.

I refuse to be crippled by the claim that I am an unreasonable person guided by hate.

I refuse to accept the charge that I am putting people at greater risk by questioning the Bush administration.

I'm also realistic enough to know that the defeat of Bush is the just the start.

Even a complete unmasking and humiliation of this idiot will only serve to partially weaken the machine behind him. But that's where the war against this machine starts.

Question what you see and hear, by all means - but don't allow yourself to be distracted by a battle - a feint - over proportional fonts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uhhuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well Done!!
Excellent Post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moderatepenguin Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Please, please, PLEASE

may I print this to share with some people? This is so well-written and reasonably presented, I think it could do quite a lot of good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. feel free to share
and if you want to share the link, I've posted in my weblog, but (because I'm operating on a crappy blog format) a permalink won't be avaliable until tomorrow, so feel free to link to this post in the meantime.

(or ask me nicely and I'll whack it into a static page)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moderatepenguin Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ooooh. Static.

A shiny static page would be lovely, although the few people I know strictly online can wait a day for the permalink. They're all on our side anyway, and so are most of their acquaintances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. here you go a shiny permalink with picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moderatepenguin Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bookmarked

and ready for distribution. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aeolian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. link?
Edited on Mon Sep-13-04 10:05 AM by aeolian
QUOTE: "FACT: The White House also released their own versions of the allegedly faked documents."

Really? Could you provide a link for that? This is the first I've heard of this...


(longtime lurker, first time poster :) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. a link? OK...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aeolian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. beautiful.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Here's the WH doc from 1968 with its own subscripted th
line 2 page 3 of 19 entry for 4 Sep 1968 posted at

http://www.usatoday.com/news/bushdocs/9-Miscellaneous.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. Please clarify the "fonts" issue ...

Is it my understanding that Republicans have accused the Bush AWOL documents of being forgeries because the fonts used were not invented in 1971???

I heard something on Malloy about this. Are they playing the "time" ambiguity game again. Technically the fonts weren't invented in 1971, they were invented in 193x. Therefore they're not lying but they're misleading.

This sounds like the same deal as they're pointing to Kerry being "IN" Cambodia, on the border of Cambodia and 60 miles from the border all in one day. Then somehow ignoring the fact (as airplane travelers) thats it's very possible (and probable) to be in more than one play on a given day through the magic of TRAVEL!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I'm not going to clarify it
I'm not even going to get into it. It's a cloud of smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I want to know because ...

... these are the talking point that they bring up. When I heard the "Christmas in Cambodia" story on Hannity, I was pretty sure it was BS. But I didn't know the details or origin of the story to debunk it.

When confronting those in doubt about the election and in the haze of this nonsense ... you need the DETAILS to explain where this nonsense came from and what the REAL story is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC