Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: Obama to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:05 PM
Original message
MSNBC: Obama to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
Chris Matthews just reported that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reported or opined? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Excellent question...
Matthews is not a journalist. He's an opinionated commentator. He might have just been opining, like you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I also saw a lengthy report on this at CNN...

maybe all of us 'complainers' are having an effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. This has been Obama's stated position since the very beginning.
You would think after a two year campaign, people would know things like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Of course I knew that...

I just found it interesting that it was suddenly being promoted as a news story in the mainstream media. They also seemed to indicate this would be happening "soon".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. It's not being promoted, they're responding to questions about it.
The press is asking, they're answering, and the press is writing about it.

The only timeframe anybody is committing to at this point is some time this year. It does have to go through Congress, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. And again, I find it encouraging that the press is specifically asking about this...

it means that they are responding to issues that their audience is interested in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The Obama spokespeople have confirmed it many times.
It's part of their platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chuck Todd on hardball says it could be a mistake.....
says he'll get caught up like Clinton did basically trying to appease gay folks? Suggested people will say he needs to concentrate on the economy and not this issue.

Damned if he does, Damned if he doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And, I don't like chuck todd so
his opinion means less than zero to me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Chuckie T does not do politics well, numbers maybe
Edited on Wed Jan-14-09 05:51 PM by Jennicut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I can't believe they picked him to be their WH correspondent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I know, really
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. screw chuck todd. his opinions turn out to be wrong most of the time anyway. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Obama refuses to get caught up in that culture war bullshit
I don't think he'll trip up on that like Clinton did. Now, next stop: DOMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's about time!
Great decision Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. good luck...the reactionary jackass Ike Skelton heads the House Armed Services committee
and he's an odious homophobe.

it seems that all the crappy "Dems" get the good committee chairmanships...I wonder why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. What does that even mean?
Are gays going back to being more directly and openly hunted down in the military? Or is he going to do what Clinton should've done 16 years ago: issue a presidential directive to end orientation discrimination in the armed services?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. One would hope that a directive would be issued.
Edited on Wed Jan-14-09 05:43 PM by Rockholm
On edit: bad spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Technically you can't issue a directive to change the UCMJ.
Nor can you undo an act of congress with a directive. It has to go through the same process as any other bill.

And what do you think it means? "More directly and openly hunted down"? Like Obama's going to go backwards? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well since you asked.
Well yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. That's a very lovely rock you've been living under. :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes it is.
It says GLBT on top of it. nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shirlden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. What ????
Is Bush taking his "signing statement" pen with him??
Can we take up a collection and get one for Obama?

:dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Nothing to put a statement on--DADT is established US law.
As such, it needs to be repealed through the Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. And now it's being reported it's being put on hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Actually no, that's just CNN trying to create a story where there isn't one.
It's the same thing that Conyers said a week or two ago that was completely distorted by Politico, et al: that the economy is the highest priority, well ahead of anything as non-critical as DADT. That doesn't equate to "it's on hold" or, as Politico fantasized, that it was being put off until after 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Not at all.Read the article again...
During the presidential campaign, Obama said he would work to end the policy, but because it is dictated by federal law, he can not ended it unilaterally.

Congress must pass legislation overturning the policy, which was put into place at the beginning of the Clinton administration. Former President Bill Clinton tried to overturn the "don't ask, don't tell" policy when he took office in 1993, but he was strenuously opposed by the military leadership.

In the last Congress, a bill was introduced in the House by Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Massachusetts, that would have implemented "a policy of nondiscrimination on the basis of sexual orientation."

The bill had 149 co-sponsors, but it never came up for a full vote in the House. It has yet to be re-introduced in the new Congress, which began last week.

"The key here is to get bills that pass the House and the Senate, that we can get to President-elect Obama to sign, and I think that we can do that, certainly, the first year of the administration," one of the co-sponsors, Democratic Rep. Ellen Tauscher of California, told CNN in November.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. Told you so.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC