Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grammar Nazi Rampage! "constructionist" Roberts alters Constitution to repair split infinitive.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:18 PM
Original message
Grammar Nazi Rampage! "constructionist" Roberts alters Constitution to repair split infinitive.
Edited on Tue Jan-20-09 01:52 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Edited to correct my dumb self... it's not "to" faithfully so there's no infinitive to split. But it's still funny.)

This amuses me because Roberts is from the school that claims to revere the Constitution exactly as written.

Here's the oath as it appears in our Constitution:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Here's the oath as presented by Roberts:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will execute the office of President of the United States faithfully, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." (Or maybe it was "execute faithfuly"... in any event, with the adverb after the verb.)

"Strict constructionist" my ass! If the framers of the Constitution wanted it to be grammatically correct they damn well would have written it that way!

It makes sense that Obama hesitated since what he was hearing was not the Oath as it has always been given. Where the freepers get the notion the Constitution part was skipped is beyond me... it wasn't. In most federal oaths the Constitution part comes first but in the Presidential Oath it comes second.

We can presume Roberts is no Star Trek fan. ("...to boldly go where no man has gone before.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. (OP edited for clarity)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is unfamiliar with the source document.
Edited on Tue Jan-20-09 01:39 PM by Patsy Stone
It probably the first time he's ever read the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was worse than that.
He said, "execute the office of President TO the United States faithfully" -- which doesn't make any sense.

Prepositions are important!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. He thought that's what it said when he skimmed it years ago nt/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm sure this will not be the only time Obama has to remind Roberts of what the words actually say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC