Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Passes Fair Pay Act After Months of Opposition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Leo The Cleo Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:35 PM
Original message
Congress Passes Fair Pay Act After Months of Opposition
http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/politics/2009/jan/Congress-Passes-Fair-Pay-Act-After-Months-of-Opposition.html


President Barack Obama is expected to sign the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay bill into law on Thursday. The bill, which the House of Representatives passed on Tuesday by a vote of 250-177, will “give workers alleging unequal pay the right to sue within 180 days of their most recent paycheck,” according to CNN. The Bush White House and the Republicans in the Senate prevented the bill from passing last year, and it became a campaign issue during the presidential election.

The law will reverse a U.S. Supreme Court decision from 2007, which said that women could not sue for wage discrimination unless they filed the claim within 180 days of receiving their first discriminatory paycheck. In the Supreme Court case, Lilly Ledbetter argued that she did not know about the wage discrimination until the latter part of her 19-year career as a Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. worker. Almost “two decades of discrimination meant her salary was 15 percent to 40 percent lower than what her male counterparts earned,” Bloomberg writes.

The new bill, which modifies the Civil Rights Act of 1964, says that each discriminatory paycheck renews the 180-day statute of limitations period. In addition to gender, the law will apply to wage discrimination based on race, religion, disability and country of origin.

“Wage discrimination still exists because there are loopholes in our federal laws,” said the bill’s sponsor, Maryland Democrat Barbara Mikulski, according to Bloomberg. “We want to close the loopholes.”

The bill’s supporters have claimed that most workers don’t compare their paychecks with each other and thus don’t discover any inequality until much later on. But opponents argue that trial lawyers will seize upon the more relaxed legislation and barrage the courts with lawsuits; furthermore, employees could potentially hold off filing their claims until later to obtain more money, opponents say, according to the Associated Press. They also say that the bill will hurt business by increasing costs.

An alternative Republican proposal was turned down. It “would have required employees alleging discrimination to act within 180 days after they would have reasonably been expected to know they were being discriminated against,” Bloomberg writes.

The House initially passed the bill on Jan. 9 but had combined the bill with another one, which made it easier to obtain discrimination awards. The Senate detached that more controversial measure when approving the bill 61-36 on Jan. 22, forcing the House to vote again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. man, it feels so nice to have Dem administration. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo The Cleo Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Michelle
I am quite sure that even if Obama didn't want to sign this, that Michelle would have given him no choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Why would he not want to sign it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
Change I can believe in. Thanks Mr. President and Democrats! :kick: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. It was Hillary's last Senate bill:




http://www.dailyrecord.com/article/20090109/UPDATES01/901090341



Hillary Clinton's last hurrah: women's pay fairness

By BRIAN TUMULTY • GANNETT NEWS SERVICE • January 9, 2009




WASHINGTON -- Two bills promoting equal pay for women could end up being the final legislative achievement for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton while she awaits confirmation as secretary of state.
Advertisement
Quantcast

Clinton is re-introducing the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act, both of which failed to pass th......................................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo The Cleo Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. One Hell of a last hoorah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thanks - I Was Curious Why She Was At The Signing This Morning
It makes sense now.

:thumbsup:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Has been needed for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC