Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grassley and Repubs whining that they were left out of Conference

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:34 PM
Original message
Grassley and Repubs whining that they were left out of Conference
February 11, 2009, 8:01 pm

Rare Conference Showcases Stimulus Deal; Final Votes Approach

By Kate Phillips

A rare conference ended just a short while ago, and its unusual nature didn’t pass without notice among ranking Republicans and Democrats who took part in the session held in the L.B.J. room after they arrived at a deal for a $789 billion economic stimulus.

Representative Charles Rangel recalled being shut out of conference negotiations by Republicans when they were in charge. Senator Charles Grassley remembered following TV cameras around to try to find a Democratic-controlled conference to make his point of view known.

With Democrats from both the House and the Senate controlling the gathering today, Mr. Grassley complained that Republicans still weren’t consulted enough on this conference, the first to be held in many years that included members of both parties. “We didn’t have a chance to negotiate,” the Republican senator from Iowa said, adding “We could’ve had 70 or 80 votes for this bill.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, while remarking on the rare nature of a conference, took issue with Mr. Grassley and others, saying there was more participation, especially at the committee level.

more

(emphasis added)

Note to Repukes:

I guess next time you want a final say in the shaping of a piece of legislation (and you already had a ginormous say in the current legislation) in the conference committee, you probably should bring more than three votes to the table in both houses. Kind of funny how that works, as all the people who voted for the bill on the GOP side are right there working with the Democrats to finalize the bill.

You WATB’s demagogued, lied, whined, and had a hissy fit about the bill, then voted against it en masse even though it contained a number of provisions you wanted and you had inserted in the bill, and then took to the air waves pleased as punch with yourselves. The adults watched you and then decided you needed a timeout. This is bad and wrong, why?

You can whine about this, or you can make sure it doesn’t happen again. Any guesses which path the GOP takes?

link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. These fuckers are just wining to get air time
We as American should be sick of their circus side show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. They look like a bunch of petulant little children.
Let them whine. Obama's approval rating is only bolstered by their petty little tirades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are such phonies.
They behave like a bunch of obstructionist and retrograde Stalinists and then they go whining like a bunch of babies because no one gives a shit what they have to say. President Obama should just call them all over to the WH and tell them to Fuck Off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Grassley's ammendment was adopted and had the largest impact on the bill
and then he doesn't even vote for it.


What goes around Grassley comes around. You are now marked as a person who wants it all one way - you want to change the legislation but you will still vote against it after they listen to you. Why in the world would anyone ever want you on a conference committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He said he didn't vote for it because grantcart liked it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Perhaps if he had made good suggestions instead of railing against the dems
with revisionist history, he might have been included. He wasn't willing to give an inch, he just wanted the bill the way HE wanted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh man. This is what I have to say to Grassley and the rest of the Rethugs (except the centrist 3)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. The comments on the New York Times article are disgusting:
As a lifelong republican and diehard conservative I am dissappointed that there were republicans that actually voted for this travesty. This could have all been avoided
if we would have held on to our conservative finanacial values of the 1950’s and 1960’s. It went like this, no job , no money, no house. Simple isn’t it.
— Lynne Lindeman


Yeah, Lynne, it's sooo simple, you heartless freak. So people don't deserve a roof over their heads if they have their jobs outsourced and are laid off, by their conservative CEO's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC