Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else picking up on the echo chamber?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:34 AM
Original message
Anyone else picking up on the echo chamber?
The newest shout: "<fill in the blank> is trying to influence the outcome of the forthcoming US presidential election."

1: Randy Scheunemann, a former advisor to the US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, accused Mr Annan of trying to influence the outcome of the forthcoming US presidential election. "I think it is outrageous for the Secretary-General, who ultimately works for the member states, to try and supplant his judgement for the judgement of the member states," he told the BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3661736.stm

2: Congressional investigation in to CBS doc: "SEN. ROBERT BENNETT (R), UTAH: A deliberate attempt on the part of a forger to change the course of an election. "

3: From CNN Paula Zahn now transcripts: ZAHN: Yes, but, Andrew Sullivan, we also heard in the second part of the statement from CBS News tonight, they believe -- they say that those objections were never raised, simply not true what these women are saying now.

SULLIVAN: Well, they are impugning the very people, experts, they asked to verify. This is extraordinary. They have to withdraw this right away, because they are not re-reporting the story. I mean, they are telling us now we're going to look further into it.

I'm sorry. They've made the story. It's wrong. It's based on a forgery. Why do they go ahead if they have these doubts? And the answer is liberal bias. Dan Rather has a beef against the Bushes for many years and he pushed this story because he wants to defeat the president. That's the obvious explanation.
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0409/15/pzn.00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. The trial balloon was the election in Spain.
It didn't work then.

But if they repeat it enough, the sheeple will probably buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Never mind the legality of the war
the incompetence of it is what's killing us. Literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC