CLANG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:36 PM
Original message |
Rachel is destroying Jindal! It's sweet! |
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Just curious. Why does he call himself Bobby? |
CLANG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Sounds better than Booby. |
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Exactly. Did no one tell him that GREG was the cool Brady? NT |
Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. Because his real name is Yippy or Skippy nt |
scrappydo
(194 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:38 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I thought it was really something.... |
|
....that Rachel was at a loss for words after Jindahl's response...:rofl:
|
CLANG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. She's so smart her brain freezes when faced with asshattery |
madmax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Rachel doesn't have to |
|
He destroyed himself. What a PUTZ!!! I hope the 'pugs' choose him to run against President Obama, :rofl:
|
lob1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Republicans are hesitate to use the name "Rob". Hits too close to home. |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-24-09 11:41 PM by lob1
|
akbacchus_BC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message |
10. It is more than sweet. Who the fuck he thinks he is than he can respond |
|
to an intelligent President. Don't worry, he is being used by the GOP, sucker cannot even see it. That is what happens to assclowns who are looking for fame, hope the fall comes hard!
|
rvablue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message |
11. And Rachel is just one reason... |
|
that the GOP cannot do what they did to Clinton to Obama.
We have Rachel.
We have Keith.
We have us, DU.
We have DKos.
We have the Daily Show.
We have the Colbert Report.
And we have EVERY SINGLE EFFIN DEMOCRAT behind the President.
We are fired up and ready to go.
It's heaven!!!!!!!!!
|
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message |
12. omfg. Someone is actually going to PAY Bush to speak somewhere? |
Malikshah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yes. It is fact a vast conspiracy by this corporation: |
|
Payless Shoe Source.
Think about it. It's a genius move on their part.
Just think of the need for shoes skyrocketing... :)
|
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. LOL! I missed the segment after the break... is that true |
Malikshah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. Rachel didn't mention it...If I could've I would have sent a quick twitter to mention the |
|
possibility. For me, it's a conspiracy. Thomas Mann, Keds, Nike are all hurting... They need something to boost sales.
A Bush speaking tour would do the job.
I personally think RIF (Reading is fundamental) could use him as a Cautionary Poster Child as well.
Thinking of Commander Cuckoobananas as the "gift that keeps on giving"
:)
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:48 PM
Response to Original message |
14. But she kept saying he's young-ish, charismatic-ish, and new-ish. |
|
He is NOT charismatic-ish!
|
Left Is Write
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-24-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. He is if you take off the "charismatic" part of charismatic-ish. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message |