Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT trying hype John "See I'm a Maverick Again" McCain.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:36 PM
Original message
NYT trying hype John "See I'm a Maverick Again" McCain.
Edited on Fri Mar-06-09 10:44 PM by ProSense
Senator John McCain is rewriting the part of presidential loser.

Unwilling to vanish into retirement like Bob Dole, or retreat into academia like Al Gore, or even quietly convalesce like John Kerry, Mr. McCain has quickly reclaimed a place on center stage in Washington, some days skewering President Obama and the Democratic Party, and on other days standing by their side.

“I’m the, as I said, loyal opposition,” Mr. McCain, Republican of Arizona, proclaimed this week. “And both words, I think, are operative.”

If anyone wondered which John McCain would return to the Senate — the coalition-building dealmaker or the gloves-off bruiser from the campaign trail — the answer is now clear: both.

link


John McCain needs to do two things:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dear John
We do not believe in you, can you try to keep up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. The press just loves him. Draft dodgers like Matthews are afraid to criticize him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Why do you say a person who served
in the peace core is a draft dodger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Because he avoided serving in the military, like poor kids had to.
The Peace Corps is great, but it was also a dodge for folks in his age group.

And, I can't blame anyone for not wanting to serve. But he's a little rich kid that went to a rich kid's school then did a rich kid's service. He, Russert, Freidman, etc. give McCain a completely free ride.

People joined the Peace Corps. They were drafted into the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. But you notice they NEVER ever give John Kerry, who was more a war hero
in the classic sense - he saved lives and devised a successful way to survive an ambush that his boat ran into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. They have selective memories. You'd think all he did in uniform was testify before Congress. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Is this the republican military? What are you saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Folks who didn't serve often feel guilty about it. Others not.
Thinking of how Matthews drooled over Bush in his flight suit, I think he has military envy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry quietly convalesced?
That is revision. Kerry continued to fight and was reaching out to his email list to enlist their help within weeks of the election. The difference is the media built McCain up and created his myth in the first place - Kerry created his own status and won the nomination with no real media support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They forgot about the
January 2005 interview about the Hamas election and everything through today. LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. It started very early - not only was there that interview,
In January 2004, Kerry went to the Middle East and Europe. He then was told by Rice and Bush that they were uninterested in his observations. At Rice's confirmation - I think in February 2005 that Kerry spoke of how Egypt, Jordan, France and Germany all volunteered to train Iraqis in their respective countries. Rice said that the training was going "well" and rejected the idea out of hand. Imagine where we would be now if Iraqis would have selected some of the best people they had and sent them for training. It might have made our presence more important in the short term, but imagine the impact when they ALL returned trained and with a mandate to police.

Kerry ended up grilling her for about 45 minutes after everyone else was done. Lugar atayed to chair the meeting and Voinivich stayed to watch. He had to ask 4 times if Pakistan's control was adequate. Before voting he pretty much said she lied - as he voted against her.

That January interview is even more impressive in retrospect. It was shortly after Iraq's purple thumb election and Rice was touting the Hamas election and Lebanon's election which brought some Hezbollah people into the government as a victories for democracy. The media was cheerleading seeing this as democracy on the move - just like Bush's inaugural address - that the NYT applauded. Kerry was 100% on target then in what he said and it is nearly the same thing he says about it now.

(As to McCain - maybe the NYT should notice that the deal makers were Collins, Snowe, and Specter - not McCain.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. And was one of the stronger opponents of Condoleeza Rice during the confirmation hearings,
Edited on Fri Mar-06-09 11:23 PM by Mass
I read this article earlier today and was stunned. They really want to preserve the character they have built, of McCain the maverick and the phoenix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. McCain is now, and always has been a grasping opportunist.
He will be a footnote in a history book one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. The corporate media better stop
trying to resusitate mccain and think about how dead the chances of Recovery would be with him and palin mucking about in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-07-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. dear john:
who lost the Super Bowl in, say 1984?...or pick another year...

dude, i know it's hard...but it's really over...

it really is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC