Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How is Obama gonna get his Budget through?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:30 AM
Original message
How is Obama gonna get his Budget through?
I mean, how much bad press can one man take,
from all sides, and still get a progressive budget through?

He's not going to change his Wall street plan now that it has been proposed,
no matter how much people scream....and if he did, it would send Wall Street
into a tailspin.

He's stated clearly that he's not going to fire Geithner, yet folks that should know better keep screaming that he needs to, on both sides.

When do we allow the plan to work, or not to work?
Or do we make noise, like dragged screaming children all the way through?

Why can't he be allowed to try it his way (like FDR was allowed to)?
What if his plan works, but he stopped from even trying it, even for a limited time.
It would become evident very soon if nothing came of it.
Who's gonna want toxic assets, if there is nothing in it for them to hold them?

What if Nationalization doesn't work because it scares away foreign investors
(the ones we borrow all of the money from because of our giant deficits)
what if investors, if we nationalize, opt to do business with other countries,
as Nationalization would only signal that what made America great originally is no more...
even if he was working to restore it.

The reason that countries like investing in America is because of our years at being a
stable symbol of free enterprise. What signal would it send to nationalize before
trying other possible remedies, when one can alway nationalize if all else fails...
knowing that even nationalization may not do the trick?

Why should someone who has been attacked as being a socialist no try other avenues
before going there? Because economist who don't do politics say so?

But most importantly,
How can he get a budget through with everyone and their mothers pissing on him all day long?

We've got the media, zogby polls, republicans, democrats, and now the liberal blogospher
coming at him at once.

How can he pass an ambitious budget under that kind of atmosphere?

I personally don't think that he can.


SO GO AHEAD AND SAY GOODBYE!
Bye-bye Budget; We hardly knew ya!


Obama budget
Obama's budget proposals for 2010 by agency
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-obama-budget-090226-ht,0,5045256.story


Obama's Budget Definitely
Not More of the Same
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/02/budget_tk.html


Krugman: I Love Obama's Budget
http://www.businessinsider.com/krugman-i-love-obamas-budget-2009-2


Obama's New 2010 Budget Promotes Radical Pro-Science Agenda
http://gizmodo.com/5161998/obamas-new-2010-budget-promotes-radical-pro+science-agenda


obama's budget includes $475 million to clean up the Great Lakes
http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2009/02/obamas_budget_includes_475_mil.html


In budget, Obama throws gauntlet for farm-subsidy fight
http://www.topix.com/movies/w/2009/03/in-budget-obama-throws-gauntlet-for-farm-subsidy-fight



Federal budget: Obama would shift tax burden to wealthy
http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/301392/


Obama To Target Tax Havens In Budget
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/24/obama-to-target-tax-haven_n_169576.html


Obama axes GOP in new budget push
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-axes-gop-in-new-budget-push-2009-03-17.html


On budget, Obama faces 'trickiest public relations challenge of his young presidency'
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2009/02/63186549/1


WIth budget, Obama takes a political gamble
http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/02/27/america/assess.php


On budget, Obama undeterred by estimates of soaring deficits ...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7GZYZ_en&q=budget,+obama&start=10&sa=N


Working to pass budget, Obama seeks help from grassroots
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/03/18/obama_budget/index.html?source=rss


Obama's budget-cutting options are limited
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/articles/2008/11/26/obamas_budget_cutting_options_are_limited/


How to Pitch a $3.8 Trillion Budget: Obama Pushes Green Jobs, Renewable Energy
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/03/obama-budget-green-jobs-renewable.php


Sen. Gregg says Obama budget will bankrupt US
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090322/ap_on_go_co/gregg_budget


GOP predicts doomsday if Obama budget passed
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090322/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_economy








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's a lot of work for a budget that's going to pass anyway, FrenchieCat.
There'll be some horse trading back and forth, but it will pass more or less as-is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If he has less mandate, all of those funky congresscritters are gonna
get in the way of change that directly affect us.

I'm not talking about taxpayer money from future generation...

I'm talking about money for our immediate agenda.

I'm not feeling too good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, remember, budget reconciliation is exempt from filibuster.
I don't worry about the budget passing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You think the 15 Democrats are gonna let this budget through?
Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 01:53 AM by FrenchieCat
Obama budget faces new hurdles

Reporting from Washington -- President Obama's $3.55-trillion budget has stumbled into a series of economic and political pitfalls that threaten to undercut his grandest ambitions.

The chairman of the Senate Budget Committee on Thursday projected deficits far higher than the Obama administration had calculated, possibly as much as $1.6 trillion higher over the next 10 years. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office is expected to issue a similar assessment today.

That bad news, combined with other recent developments, portends a rocky road for the Obama budget, which was initially hailed by congressional Democrats for promoting such liberal priorities as expanded access to health insurance and curbs on global warming.

In the three weeks since the budget was unveiled, fiscally conservative Democrats have raised concerns about proposed spending increases. Leaders of the House and Senate tax-writing committees have criticized some of Obama's proposed tax increases on wealthier Americans. And influential Democrats are backing away from using a legislative shortcut that may be Obama's best hope for passing his far-reaching health and energy policies.

An additional multibillion-dollar bailout for banks and other financial institutions, which the administration will soon propose, is expected to add more pressure to the federal government's finances.


Into that tinderbox, a lit match has come from new deficit estimates.

Where Obama's budget foresees rolling up $7 trillion in cumulative deficits over the next 10 years, Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) on Thursday pegged the deficits at $1.6 trillion higher over that period.

Conrad, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, said the figure was calculated by his panel's Democratic staff members.

The Congressional Budget Office report today is expected to reflect a worsening deficit outlook in part because economic conditions have deteriorated in the two months since the administration set its budget assumptions. The office is expected to project lower revenue and higher spending than what Obama's budget assumed.

Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), one of about 15 moderate Democrats concerned about Obama's spending levels, said the White House might have to reassess its priorities in light of the new estimates.

"That will influence what we might think is the appropriate level of spending -- what might be put off to another budget, what we can pursue incrementally," said Nelson, a member of the budget panel.

"I think this budget is in for some tough sledding," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). "Some components of his budget are going over like a lead balloon."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-budget20-2009mar20,0,1486768.story


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
empyreanisles Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sadly, my senator Kay Hagan, might be one of the Dems. causing trouble.
She is in Bayh's group. I am very disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, they will. A good budget writer always has some padding to trim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. You sound so sure.....
why don't I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Well, you're right and I'm wrong.
:)

The budget won't survive *exactly* as is, but the Obama budget team knew that in advance and put some padding in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. But that is the problem isn't it?
Who wants congress to work over his budget!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. I don't think it's going to be a problem, because there was an expectation of that anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. You call THAT change???!!!
:rofl:

and, yes, where are all the critics? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Obviously nobody really gives a shit,
unless they can have their foot up his ass.
then everything is real important....down to the micro everything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. I really hope he can get some things passed in it. I fear Evan Bayh will be a total ahole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Actually, FDR faced quite a bit of opposition from the Republicans and even some Democrats.
Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 02:03 AM by 4lbs
FDR furthermore threatened the US Supreme Court in a way.

He was tired of the USSC striking down many of his instilled plans, policies, and programs. So, he tried to get a bill passed that would expand the Supreme Court up to 15 justices, enough to give him a majority.

While the bill didn't pass, it pretty much intimidated the USSC into no longer striking down his programs in the New Deal for the remainder of his terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. If you go back and look at the political cartoons of the time period, the media was very much agains
the New Deal. People supported it though. They trusted Roosevelt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Did they have the 24/7 media bashing everyone's head in with the
GOP latest talking points every day even then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. Sort of a deja vu if you think about it.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChuckTodd Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. He's not getting it passed
hate to say it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. say more, please.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChuckTodd Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I'll say more, but only becuz u asked
The Democrats are gutless. Some of them just disgust me. If Obama fails as president, I don't know who I'll support next. I just have no faith in a Democrat outside of Barack Obama. I hope the guy succeeds, lord knows we don't need to have the GOP in charge any time soon.


Oh, Evan Bayh can go to hell and take Lieberman with him. Scum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. It all depends on Harry Reid
and to some extent, the willingness of progressive groups to take on the DINO's in their own districts- 1st with ads and then with money and high profile challengers.

Accountability Now already has plans on the latter- and I'm sure there'll be more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChuckTodd Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. One thing this budget does that is needed
is focus on energy. We need to start developing things that we can sell to other countries. Energy seems to be the best bet.

Honestly, I have no clue how Obama or any other Democrat can get universal health care passed. Its just gonna cost too much. I wish him luck, but I don't see it happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. That's one thing that will get though
because even the DINO's are afraid of the backlash on that if they fail to use the reconcilliation process. Reid will be toast in 2010 (which wouldn't necessarily be such a bad thing for the Dems).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. He's gonna fix Bush messed up Medicare part D
It's costing us trillions, literally!

Here's some info on that!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8206100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
36. go back to freerepublic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whalestoe Donating Member (928 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. GOP predicting doomsday?
This budget better pass! They're never right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Nothing new!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
23. I've been wondering that since it was announced. Not for quite the same reasons.
I'm not sure how he gets this budget passed. Sadly it seems likely that it will be gutted in committed and look substantially different in the end.

What I wish Obama would do is veto bullshit and make them write it again if it doesn't sufficiently reflect his spending agenda. And I wish Obama would demand that Harry Reid FORCE Republicans to ACTUALLY FILLABUSTER not just THREATEN to fillabuster!

We don't need 60 votes to pass legislation. We need 51 votes. We need 60 votes to break a fillabuster, which never fucking happens because Democrats never make them actually do it.

Make them stand there, unable to yield the floor, 24/7 and put it on national television with the title "Your obstructionists at work."

Anyway... I'm ranting now... lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Did you see this, Political Heretic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I'm still reading on this (beyond the WAPO piece) but it sounds quite encouraging.
I am cautiously optimistic! Still digging through the details... :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Do you think congress will do this?
After the hearings today, I'm not so sure.

They are calling it a "Power grab"....

So till this is agreed upon by congress,
hedge funds and insurance companies can't be nationalized.....
which is the real power that the Obama administration is asking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. I'm wondering what Obama might be asked to give up in exchange
...could be some wheeling and dealing that gets this done. I'm okay with deals, I just want them to be the right deals. I'm trying to think about what kind of deal I might be okay with. I haven't gone line item through the proposed budget yet - maybe there's room to deal there...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
27. He just needs 51 votes, not 60. He will get it through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. But what will it look like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
30. With some KY, maybe?
Best thing for the sheer size and girth of that puppy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. But this reverses 30 years of Reagan......
and that's a big fish!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC