Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let me see if I have this straight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:14 PM
Original message
Let me see if I have this straight
Edited on Wed Mar-25-09 04:15 PM by Redbear
If I oppose Republican policies when they are espoused by a Republican president, I'm right.

If I support Democratic policies when they are espoused by a Democratic president, I'm right.

If I oppose Republican policies when they are espoused by a Democratic president, I'm a closet freeper who wants Republicans to be in power for the next thirty years, so that they can carry out the Republican policies I oppose.

?????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. By George, I think you've got it!!
Don't forget that you're a traitor if you question anything the President says or does, too.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
38. The raaiiin in Spain falls mainly in the plaaiiin!
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Some people here think that criticism is on the same level as complete opposition.
Denying it is pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. yes. indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not for the most part.

I remember when Bush did the first bailouts. As much as we all despise the moron, he was mostly applauded here for taking a position right out of the Liberal playbook.

But we did at least get to enjoy the pained expression on his face when he did it! Even he was smart enough to recognize that he was betraying everything the Laissez-Faire Rightists espouse. The man who never admitted wrong, never changed his mind ... was forced by his handlers to take a 180 degree turn.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Huh? What page of the liberal playbook...

... describes bailing out Wall Street bankers with hundreds of billions of dollars?

:shrug:

That was a BushCheneyPaulsonDisasterCapitalist plan through and through... made possible with the help of a gun held to the heads of panicked lawmakers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ay yay yay
....

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Avoiding nuance for the sake of starting arguments sure is fun...
don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nuance is only for those who understand such.....
While Nader is the candidate for those who live in a world of make-belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Like people who thought that decades upon decades
of Wall Street's infiltration into DC would disappear with a wave of Obama's mighty hand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Aye! Or else they really believed the Freepers calling Obama a socialist.
Who's gonna explain it to them? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Nuance is the last refuge of the scoundrel.
i.e. They aren't prisoners of war, they are merely "enemy combatants"

or The federal govt paying 93% of the cost of an asset, taking 100% of the downside risk, but sharing 50% of any profits with third party hedge funds is not a transfer from the lower and middle classes to the upper class it is a "public-private partnership."


I have faith that President Obama will change Washington someday, but the current Geithner plan is as status quo Washington as you can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. LOL... creative bastardization of the quote, but no.
Nuance is how morons stop flinging poo like "you're an obama worshippper!" and "you're a freeper!" at each other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, that's pretty much the shape of it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Its all nonsense. We can criticize the President and still support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. I believe the post is directed at a particular group on DU who says you cannot
They may be loud, but fortunately they are small in actual numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Welcome to DU.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. You got it!
That's pretty much it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirBaud Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Let me see if I have this straight.
You think Barack Obama espouses Republican policies? Would a closet freeper believe something so idiotic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. President Obama espouses hundreds of Democratic positions and
a few that in my opinion are Republican ones.

The new bank rescue plan is one and his opposition to gay marriage is another.

He is a great president, but I will continue to state my belief that he is wrong on those issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Yes, his opposition to gay marriage sucks. No way around that. Its disappointing that this
opposition seems to be a very common Democrat/ Republican stance.
I guess the real difference between the two parties on this is their stance on a constitutional amendment that legislates bigotry.

Obama says it should be up to states.
But then he says he doesn't personally support it.
I think Hillary Clinton and John Edwards said the same.
This has always represented a sort of logic vacuum to me.
I'm against it, but let the states decide so I don't have to be the one to allow it or deny it.
Its a real cop-out and I can't wait for this to be just an embarrassing blip in American history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. A Constitutional amendment
is what DOMA was created to prevent. I honestly think we would have that amendment now if DOMA had not been in place.

We need to work really hard to legalize marriage rights in all 50 states. ALL of us...straight, gay, bi or trans...It is up to US.

What I don't hear enough of in the arguments is to ask the jerks who keep spouting that gay marriage "threatens traditional marriage" to explain exactly HOW! The counter arguments are for another thread, though. All I will continue to say is - I live in Massachusetts - The state still exists, we have not broken off the country and floated out to sea, and heterosexual marriage still exists here....Imagine that! I know of not a single coupe who divorced because the gay couple down the street got married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Interesting! I have never looked at DOMA that way. I was too young to know what was going on
politically and at that time my parents were pretty radical Republicans who thought Bill and Hillary Clinton were evil.
I had to get to know Bill and especially Hillary after Bush defeated Gore.

I really love your last statement! My recently liberalized parents were making a lot of jokes about that during the 2004 election. My dad kept saying that if someone's marriage is threatened because two men or two women you don't even know got married, then you are really looking for an escape. He imagined the hilarity of adulterous, straight husbands using gay marriage as an excuse for their bad behavior. "Well, honey. What do you expect? Its those gays! Our marital bond takes a hit every time they say their vows!" It was the absolute absurdity of the gay marriage issue in 2004 along with the nasty Swiftboaters that brought my father to vote for the first Dem in his life (Kerry). And once that threshold was crossed, he gets more and more liberal. It goes against the adage that people get more conservative with age.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm a super secret double agent.
You get a great decoder ring, too.



Evidently I'm a racist, too, which came as a surprise to me. All my neighbors in Oakland for the last 18 years were pretty polite about not mentioning my white hood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. And you're a Nazi too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. this is not an official response, but

Democratic Underground is an online community for Democrats and other progressives. Members are expected to be generally supportive of progressive ideals, and to support Democratic candidates for political office.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules_detailed.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Here comes the censorship!
Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. it isn't censorship. it is purpose. this board has a purpose.
it is the support of democrats, and the support of progressive ideas. people who do nothing but bash people, argue, attack, etc, do not fit that purpose. everyone agrees when they sign up here that they understand that. :shrug:
nonetheless, as long as people remain civil, they can pretty much express most ideas. you signed an agreement to be civil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. How many of these whiny posts do we need?
Do we need new threads for people saying the same thing 30 times a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. You forgot your pom poms!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. Obama is calling for greater regulation than we have had in decades. His budget is the most liberal
we have had in decades. His health care proposal scares the crap out of Republicans because it create a massive government program that will the people will be unwilling to surrender.

Which policies of Obama are Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Everything?!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. Handing out trillions of dollars of our money to the banks.
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 05:21 AM by chascarrillo
Sounds pretty Republican to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. But there is a lot more to the plan. And all the budget proposals, health care, green jobs
proposals will need to work along side a reformed, retooled banking system.
Its just a necessity.

Some people (not you, just an example) like to claim that Obama and Bush are the same because of massive government spending. They say that Bush's spending spree left us in a mess, so therefore Obama shouldn't look to spending as part of a solution. The difference, of course, is what the money is spent on.

A Republican handing out trillions to banks vs. a Democrat handing out trillions to banks can very well be two completely different policies. Of course, that is not guaranteed. I just think the party distinction at least warrants a closer look at what the policy entails, what kind over oversight is granted, what safety net is provided for the taxpayers, etc.

I really don't think the bailout plan has been looked at in detail by the majority of people.
I still haven't found the full text.
Until that is released, I am going to keep an open mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #28
37. yeah, because letting the world economy collapse is such a better idea.
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 08:43 AM by dionysus
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. Yeah, that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
30. And there you have it !
It's crazy I know... but if you just trust in Obama you will find salvation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
36. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
39. You got it.
All you need to know:

If Obama does it, he's right, and you are obligated to either join the loud cheering squad or shut up. :sarcasm:

Even if all those cheering and trying to silence dissent were taking a completely different position on the issue/s pre-Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
40. diabolically simple
isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
41. No, the third option makes you a racist
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
42. And if all you do is whine like a whiny ass titty baby about everything Obama does...
and defend you're whinery with bullshit about "dissent is patriotic you nazi!", then you're just fucking worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC