Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Siegelman: Stevens Case Is Dropped, So Why Not Mine?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:47 PM
Original message
Siegelman: Stevens Case Is Dropped, So Why Not Mine?
Holder needs to do the right thing here-



For Don Siegelman, DOJ's decision on Ted Stevens just adds insult to injury.

"There seems to be substantial evidence of prosecutorial and other misconduct in my case, that would dwarf the allegations in the Stevens case," the former Alabama governor told TPMmuckraker in an interview moments ago.

Referring to Attorney General Eric Holder, Siegelman said that while he supports the Stevens decision, "I hope that will take a look at some of the other cases that are buried on his desk."

This morning, the Justice Department announced it was dropping the charges against Stevens, citing prosecutorial misconduct -- specifically, the government's failure to hand over key evidence to the defense. In response, Stevens declared today: "I always knew that there would be a day when the cloud that surrounded me would be removed."

Siegelman has suffered a different fate. He was convicted and jailed in 2006, in connection to his appointment of a campaign contributor to a state board. Though he is now out of jail pending his appeal, the conviction is still standing, despite evidence that the prosecution was politically motivated -- a witness has given sworn testimony that Karl Rove was involved -- and despite numerous credible allegations of misconduct on the part of prosecutors, jurors, and the judge. Some of the most compelling allegations involve withholding of evidence by prosecutors from the defense.


Siegelman is clearly alive to the parallels between the two cases, along with their starkly different results, at least as of now. "That dichotomy did not escape me," he told TPMmuckraker.

...
Siegelman said he hoped that the mass of evidence that his prosecution was tainted would "warrant consideration of doing the same thing in my case as he did in Senator Stevens'."...
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/siegelman_stevens_case_is_dropped_so_why_not_mine.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly.
Instead the Feds should be seriously turning up the heat on Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ain't that the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good question...
I doubt anyone is really wondering... I'm sure most have an idea why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. That is likely to happen if you give him time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:27 PM
Original message
Thank-you. This microwave society we live in now drives me
nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd like to know the answer to that question my damn self. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. perhaps the plan was to START with stevens. throw the
republicans a bone, show them how egalitarian we can be and then release siegelman. of course, rove still has to go under the microscope. perhaps this is the setup for prosecuting the prosecutors.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry -- we're not "reaching out" to the left this month -- just the radical right
Maybe sometimes next year, but feel free to check back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. And How Does Anyone Know That Won't Happen?
When is his appeal scheduled to be heard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I wouldn't mind knowing that..
before I passed condemnation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Exactly....
I have no doubts that the AG will be looking very closely at the case.

If the former Governor was still behind bars, I would see a need for urgency, but he is at home, and I thought the appeal was scheduled soon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Red'd for Don Siegelman
Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRAZY_DEM Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Cant... Asshole Rethugs would say were doing it for "political purposes" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Unless it was preceded by a strikingly similar case of prosecutorial
misconduct, to which the Justice Department could point if accused of partisanship.

I think it might happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Has the judge in his case said that there was prosecutorial misconduct?
The Judge in the Stevens case did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. The judge in the Stevens case was close to Holder
"...The attorney general also knows the trial judge, Emmett Sullivan, well. The two men served together as judges of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia before each was promoted to higher office.
..."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102589818
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Many thanks for giving us the GOP view on most subjects
Edited on Thu Apr-02-09 05:23 PM by Kingofalldems
It is very informative to find out what republicans are thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. Nobody built Siegelman a house.
There was also plenty of misconduct. Plenty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R for Siegelman!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Damn good question
Edited on Thu Apr-02-09 02:39 PM by sonias
His case is far more clear on the prosecutorial misconduct.

Free Don Siegelman!

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. O.K. Mr. President, Enough Of This "Hands Across The Aisle" Bullshit
Edited on Thu Apr-02-09 02:43 PM by Dinger
You've done more than bend over backwards. If you give 'em and inch, they take a lot more than a mile. Enough is enough. You van put the hammer down, yes you can! YOU'RE the boss, end of story. Now, go get 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Mike Malloy mentioned this last night
Said he agreed with Holder's decision to drop the case against Stevens, even though Stevens was more than likely guilty as sin, because:
1) It's the law, and it's always a good thing to have an Attorney General that obeys the law consistently, even when the results suck.

2) The Stevens case was fucked specifically because the Bush Crime Family "justice" department withheld evidence from the defense, and their motive in doing so was blatantly political. By acknowledging this reality and doing what the law requires (i.e. letting Stevens go) it calls attention to the fact that the case against Siegelman was even more blatantly political. Not to mention the fact that Siegelman actually spent several months in prison on this bogus bullshit, unlike that pathetic old 'Puke in Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. A court recently upheld several of the charges against Siegelman.
Still hopefully Holder will give this case a looksie within the parameters of the Bush Justice Dept abuses of which there were many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yes. Why not?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. I think Siegelman's case is a hell of a lot more pressing than that old asshole from
Alaska. Siegelman is facing a return trip to jail in front of the same bunch of crooks who sent him there in the first place.

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
24. K&R for justice and Siegelman. Holder will be a failure to me unless
he addresses Don Siegelman's case and the other 700 political prosecutions by the Bush Crime Family.

And when is the President going to clean the scum out of the justice department? It needs to become a priority soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
27. No kidding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC