butterfly77
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-19-09 03:21 PM
Original message |
The republicons said cut SPENDING so.. |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-19-09 03:43 PM by butterfly77
I don't want to hear them crying this week once the President begins cutting SPENDING by getting rid of PORK as the republicons all have been crying about. They want to cut SPENDING so I hope that the Pres cuts all of their so called pet projects in these different departments.
I wonder how many will be whining because their friends and families free rides will be over because our Pres will get rid of the PORK. Repugs say that he needs to cut the SPENDING so that is what he is doing..How will fox and the republiCONS try to spin this..
Saturday, April 18th, 2009 at 5:30 am Weekly Address: Efficiency and Innovation With the process of going through the budget line by line in full swing, the President uses his Weekly Address to give some examples, big and small, of how the Administration is working to cut costs and eliminate waste. The President also announces two new key appointments, Jeffrey Zients as Chief Performance Officer and Aneesh Chopra as Chief Technology Officer, who will be invaluable in streamlining the way government functions through efficiency and innovation.
|
Diamonique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-19-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Once again he is doing what he said during the campaign. |
|
And the Rethugs will act like it's a catastrophe, as if they'd never heard of this before.
Well I'll give them a little benefit of the doubt.. just a little. It's been a long time since we had a President that jumped in feet first and started doing the things he campaigned on.
Go 'Bama!
|
jberryhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-20-09 07:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They'll find exceptional merit in something the administration is cutting, and then cry a river over how "Obama hates fuzzy puppies" or whatever it is.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |