Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama and Geithner just pissed off a lot of rich people. Going after

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:39 AM
Original message
Obama and Geithner just pissed off a lot of rich people. Going after
Edited on Mon May-04-09 11:00 AM by babylonsister
people and companies who plop their money in tax havens. WooT!

Live on m$nbc now.

The prez just called it a tax scam, which it is. Ha! Take that!

"One of our biggest tax loopholes"

If financial institutions won't cooperate, we'll assume they're doing something illegal and will act accordingly.

Save $210B!

Making good on yet another campaign promise: "Beginning to restore fairness and balance to our tax code."

YAY!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. let the right wing whining start in three ... two ..... .one .....
Edited on Mon May-04-09 10:42 AM by Clio the Leo
Oh the joys of the conservative chorus comprised of working class idiots who are convinced the President is taking their money. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Hahaha! They won't know what to think. Can't wait to hear
LimbaughHannityBeck's reaction. This probably applies to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. True. Did you hear the guy at the GOP pizza party....
... tell Jeb Bush, Cantor and Mittens that Rush was the only one in the party making any sense?

They just sat there with their jaws hanging open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Their base, dumber than a box of rocks.
I am just surprised they were surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've been waiting for this my entire life.
Get those fuckers Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Isn't this grand?! There's a lot of money to be had by going after
people who use tax havens. He said he'd do it, and now they are! :fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. this is the change I voted for.....
but just a note of clarity....
I believe he said the 210 B saved would be over ten years.
GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Me, too. And I'll edit the OP, thanks. GOBAMA! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. About time this loophole gets clamped down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good! 210 billion, I like the sound of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. Awesome.
These aren't mere torturers; these people are criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. I have read articles in the past that said very little tax auditing of the wealthy goes on currently
and that you had a far better chance of being audited it you made 50K or below - definitely NOT the part of the population evading mega thousands in tax shelters and offshore accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Heh. Stock market up 2%. Business must like the plan!
I don't believe that, but I wonder if that's how Larry Kudlow will interpret things. Probably not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. When you start adding up all of these goodies that are going to come
to fruition, seems it will contribute heavily to down the size of the debt that's being incurred right now. This is soooo great..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. i already heard them whining that this is a tax increase.....that's how they are gonna frame it
poor corporations were so coddled by the bu$h*/cheney criminal enterprise, they don't know how to act under real leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. A tax increase? You've got to be kidding me. They have been
skirting paying any taxes for years! The companies and people involved don't have a leg to stand on, and good luck to any rethug who wants to frame it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. if I hid money from the IRS... they'd be down my throat faster than you could
blink. and i would be a tax cheat. but these guys.... grrr!!! thank god obama is at least trying. it's more than our 'representatives' are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Meet The New Boss"
Really, meet the New Boss!

:P

I spit on the replies I've read in 2009 that use the old "meet the new boss same as the old boss" meme.

Fuck them.

Meet the New Boss!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. we ain't in Kansas anymore... woohoo!
I just hope he can take the intense heat we KNOW he'll get from the whiny corprats over this. Many of them STILL OWN Congress....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. Amen!
Some people don't know a good thing when it drops in on Marine One. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
57. I spit
with you:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. lol.
Seriously!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
61. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
68. on this, sure.
spit away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. Pres Obama campaigned on this.
And it is a sweet reckoning indeed!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
20. The real question is whether it can get through Congress
and given what happened with the cramdown bill I wonder if their is enough spine to pass this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Does this have to go through Congress? They will be enforcing current regulations
Not creating new ones. At least that was my impression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Yes you can't change
how companies report, deduct etc income without changing tax laws. Yeah, some things can be done through better enforcement, but not all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
51. Yes. Current regulations and laws allow this
100% legal in fact.

Many companies that sell products overseas, do not bring the money back in the United States because it would then be taxed. So they keep foreign profits in foreign banks.

Cisco Systems does this to the tune of billions. In fact a few years ago they borrowed money to purchase Scientific Atlanta rather than use their cash, because it was cheaper to borrow money than to bring the money home and pay tax on it.

In any event, because it would be a change in tax laws, Congress would be involved.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #51
60. OK, then we all need to let our Congress Critters know to support this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. That's the 210 billion dollar question
The Prez is going to have to roll the senate blue dogs to get this into law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lavndrblue Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. The biggest part to this is stopping
the tax breaks for sending jobs offshore.

Thank you Mr. President!!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Link: Obama Announces Plan To Crack Down On Tax Havens
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/04/obama-cracks-down-on-tax_n_195523.html


Obama Cracking Down On Tax Havens

PHILIP ELLIOTT | May 4, 2009 12:52 PM EST | AP



WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama vowed to "detect and pursue" American tax evaders Monday as he announced a plan to close tax loopholes and clamp down on overseas shelters.

The president said he wants to prevent U.S. companies from deferring tax payments by keeping profits in foreign countries rather than recording them at home. He also called for more transparency in bank accounts held by Americans in tax havens such as the Cayman Islands.

"If financial institutions won't cooperate with us, we will assume that they are sheltering money in tax havens and act accordingly," Obama said.

The president, who hammered on this issue during his long campaign for the White House, said at a White House event that his plan would generate $210 billion in new taxes over 10 years and "make it easier" for companies to create jobs at home. Over a decade, $210 billion would make a modest dent in a federal deficit expected to swell to $1.2 trillion in 2010.

Under the plan, companies would not be able to write off domestic expenses for generating profits abroad. The goal is to reduce the incentive for U.S. companies to base all or part of their operations in other countries.

The current law, Obama said, "says you should pay lower taxes if you create a job in Bangalore, India, than if you create one in Buffalo, New York. "

He said the government also is hiring nearly 800 new IRS agents to enforce the U.S. tax code.

Congress is expected to resist significant portions of Obama's plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. Not to be a wet blanket, but I'll believe this when it actually happens. We all know
who really owns the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. $210B over 10 years vs $7+Trillion handout to banksters
Do the math.

It'll happen because it's not that big of a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Where's the $7 trillion of Treasury "handouts"?
TARP funds are mostly, with the exception of funds used for AIG, legally binding stakes that we will largely recover or at the very least we will get large dividend payments in the meantime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. When do those 'large dividend payments' start?
:shrug:

Although you're right, AIG = Black Hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. The problem with arrangements like this, "legally binding stakes", is that in many,
if not most, cases, the assisted party really isn't bound by any kind of deal, because they welch out on their end of the bargain, and nobody bothers to call them on it. We The People get screwed yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. watch all those companies in the Cayman Islands go crazy.
too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. It is absolutely amazing how they have managed to convince people w/o a pot to piss in
that it is in their best interest to fight for the right of the wealthy to keep as much money as they can hang onto.

Incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. that's why they don't want education. people with an education know
better and can understand perfectly well what they are trying to do. uneducated folks who are raised to blindly believe what they are told and not ask questions (and i don't mean all religious folks are like that)but the ones that are are just the suckers these jerks need. it amazes me too, but some people just don't know any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
58. Precisely.. and President
Obama does!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Indeed! This is so exciting!!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
67. Yep. People who can't pay their damn bills are terrified of creeping "socialism"
The ones who should ever truly fear socialism are the wealthy. The fact that so many part-time security guards at Wal-Mart were so afraid speaks to the amount of ignorance in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandgirl808 Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. oh noes
what are rich people going to do????

:yoiks:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. It is NOT tax havens
Here is my post on LBN:

A few months ago, our VP asked me to look at the impact a number of the proposed tax changes would have (I work in the tax department). Since I do not work on international taxes (I do primarily Federal), I went to the international group to talk to them. For those who do not know, the provision Obama is talking about is the deferral of taxes on un-patriated income. Here is a quick summary of how it works:

If I manufacture a good in the US and sell it to China, I will most likely have a Chinese company set up that will be able to employ salespeople in China, familiar to their customs. I have to do what is called a transfer pricing study that is an outside study showing what I would have to sell this product for if my sub. In China were not related to me. This then tells me the revenue that the US company must recognize. The Chinese company then sells the product in China and the remaining revenue is taxed in China. The US company does not pay any taxes on the Chinese company’s profits until the money is sent back to the US. Thus, if the money is reinvested in the Chinese company, a company is able defer paying US taxes until said time it is sent back to the US
They raised a couple interesting points:
1. Is this the reason companies are shipping jobs overseas? Most likely it is due to rock bottom wages and absolutely NO environmental laws.
2. Most all other countries in the world have the same provision in their tax codes. Thus, there would be the risk that in the long term, companies would begin to move their headquarters overseas.
The belief of many international experts (per one person I was talking to) was that Obama would decrease the corporate tax rate as an offset to this. This would allow the companies to be in essentially the same competitive position they are currently in as it relates to the global market.

Thus, those companies with a higher percentage of their income coming from overseas would see their taxes go up, while those that do the majority of the business in US would see theirs go down.

Anyway, this is my 2 cents that I have learned about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Obama Calls for New Curbs on Offshore Tax Havens
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/05/business/05tax.html?ref=global-home

snip//

One key proposed change would restrict companies from deferring the payment of taxes on profits earned overseas. Administration officials said the plan would keep businesses from taking deductions against their taxes by inflating the amount of foreign taxes they paid.

Mr. Obama raised the idea frequently during his presidential campaign. In his remarks to Congress in February, as he outlined his priorities for the year, he pledged to make the tax code more equitable by “finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas.”

The White House said that Mr. Obama is seeking to crack down on overseas tax havens in an attempt to “close the international tax gap.”

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. I believe that is a different issue
There is clearly an issue with companies setting up "fake" companies that may hold trademarks, etc. in havens like Bermuda. Specifcally, setting up an address and claiming these companies hold a bunch of intangibles.

That said, in my work as a tax CPA, I have seen a lot of companies that don't employ strategies like this and are geniunely interested in just entering new foreign markets. I agree that something needs to be done, but hope we don't just make sweeping changes that negatively honest companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. No, this is what the president was talking about this morning. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. No, you are wrong.
Believe me. I am a tax CPA and work in a corporate tax department. I have seen releases from BNA, RIA, CCH, D&T, E&Y and KPMG. All say the same thing and it is EXACTLY as I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. Dear tax frauds: MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
41. Filing this under: "Things that wouldn't happen if Obama had not won."
The Democratic candidacy.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KathieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
42. Woohoo!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
45. Well, well, well. Actually curing the desease instead of
Edited on Mon May-04-09 01:44 PM by lunatica
just treating the symptoms with a stupid band-aid. I'm agog. What next?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmybama Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
47. Duh!
These people knew this was coming and yet they let him get
elected anyway. Boo Hoo Hoo. Good for the pres. Sinch the
loophole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. 'they let him get elected anyway?' What does that mean? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. let him? splain please n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmybama Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. What I mean.
As in elections the power has always thrown something out
usually late in the election season that sheds a dim light on
the Democratic candidate. ie, Kerry, Dukakis. It has always
been the job of the MSM to do this. And based on O's campaign
he said he was going to do this(Off shore tax loophole).  I
think that had Big Biz worked harder they would have
succeeded. I' am glad they didn't this time. We need more than
the 12 of the last 40 years in power. I hope that clears up my
statement. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
52. That's $210 billion over 10 years.
Still good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
54. Well.. this is EXACTLY the kind of crap that happens when you get rid of LOBBIESTS..
Now there is no one around to pay off the president and throw in favors to keep the corporate wing all fat & happy.

BOO HOO!!!!!! :) Awesome..

I was optimistic that Obama would do 1/2 of what he campaigned on. I didn't ever even harbor a thought that he'd try to get all 1/2 of it done in his first 110 days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
55. Or, as the Republicans would say,
THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN HISTORY!!!!!!!! AAAAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGHHHHHH!!!! Stopping tax evasion is actually a tax hike!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
56. Yeah, baby~
Prez O is all about saving us Mon-EY!:fistbump:B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
59. Portrait of a Teabagger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
63. It's a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. And a damned good one! Now if Franken ever gets seated
more legislation will pass and sooner rather than later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
65. It really is about time
Edited on Mon May-04-09 07:19 PM by Grateful for Hope
Even though we all know that any bill that is passed in this matter will be watered down, it is a great beginning.

We couldn't have elected a better person, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC