WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 06:08 PM
Original message |
Question: Would the GOP be going after a prior administration for blatant |
|
crimes committed while they were in office?
|
tularetom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Of course I guess it would depend on whether said prior administration was R or D.
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They went after Clinton when he was in office. |
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. But there was a secondary purpose for it. They didn't want Gore to be elected |
|
that is all that the whole impeachment thing was about, ensuring a Repuke got elected after Clinton.
|
RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Blatant crimes? You mean like misuse of cigars? |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Think if mccain palin got in...would they go |
|
after the dick and bush? No.
Would they go after a Dem Prez while he's in office? Yes.
|
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If and only if it was a Democrat |
Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. I agree, if it was a Democratic administration |
|
because tainting the Democratic brand is always good for the GOP
|
TwilightZone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
CaliforniaPeggy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Interesting question... |
Laelth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Yes. No question. It's a shame we're not doing the same. n/t |
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Unlikely, unless it benefitted them politically or financially. |
|
If it would harm them or make trouble for them in getting their agenda passed, they would drop the idea like a hot potato. Republican politics is really nothing more than a front for making sure friends of Republican politicians and the firms they own or work for make a lot of money. The GOP electorate may be concerned about certain values but the politicians who represent them dont care about those at all.
|
CakeGrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message |
12. If it's an opposition party, it should be obvious that today's Republican party |
|
would use the flimsiest excuse to hound them out of power.
It should also be remembered that Corporations benefit from Republican policies, so as long as the media is Corporate-owned, the Republican party has an ally in their efforts.
Short answer to the OP's question? DUH!
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. I put it up as a sarcasm.... |
|
Sorry I didn't put the little sacasm thingy...
|
MadMaddie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message |
14. A certain non-security related Blow Job seems to fit the bill!! |
Proud Liberal Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-12-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Well they kind of did with Clinton after he left office |
|
Remember how they investigated Clinton staffers' supposed vandalism of the White House, using their RW surrogates (along with their mouthpieces in the MSM) to insinuate that the White House had been purposely and criminally vandalized while Ari, et. al pretended to be oh so "above" the situation and refusing to provide any details about what exactly had been done to the WH? According to the GAO, it all turned out to be a big hoax, of course-just like 99.99999999999% of everything they accused, implicated, or investigated Clintons for.
|
quakerboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-13-09 12:01 AM
Response to Original message |
|
If it was another Republican one, certainly not.
And if it was a Democratic one, they would ignore all reality and make up a whole set of pretend crimes to go after them on instead.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |