I feel sorry for Miss California........

[KansasVoter]

Some how she had partially nude photos taken of her and did not know it. Even though she was looking in the camera and posing.

Weird how that guy tricked her!!

[SpiralHawk]

1. OMG - Republicons are sooo persecuted

Who are the EVIL Doers who did this to her? They should be tortured.

[lunatica]

2. Her non-pose as she looks straight at the camera

is totally natural too... as the breeze just naturally exposes her now discarded breasts in just the right way.

[GCP]

3. I feel sorry for the ones who believe her

Room temperature IQs everywhere.

No knock on the OP - I get the irony!

[Eric J in MN]

11. You might consider me an idiot then, because....

...while I don't know what her agreement was with the photographer, it seems plausible to me that he promised her that he wouldn't seek publication of the semi-nude photos from the session.

The fact that those good-looking semi-nude photos weren't published before this week suggests an agreement not to publish them. It wouldn't have been difficult for the photographer to gets those published at the time if he had tried.

Regarding the fact that she's looking at the camera, models need to take direction and get into position, sometimes one step at a time.

[rocktivity]

4. And she had the nerve to say they were taken between posed shots without her knowlege

on a windy day.

As Keith pointed out, in at least two of the shots she was looking directly into the camera. And if it was windy enough to blow her vest open, shouldn't it have been windy enough to blow her hair all around, too?



I honestly can't tell if she's really that hypocritical or really that stupid.

:crazy:
rocktivity

[customerserviceguy]

6. I'm going for stupid

As you can see, her hair is NOT blowing around from any "wind", unless you count air leaking from that head of hers. I'm still amused that the fundies love her even though she calls their only approved form of matrimony 'opposite marriage'.

[Eric J in MN]

9. She must have known that the photographer would have a chance....

...to photograph her nipples.

But the fact that these photos weren't published before this week suggests that they had an agreement that he wouldn't publish photos showing her nipples.

[me b zola]

17. The vest isn't large enough to cover both of her breasts

Look at the fit. She had to pull/stretch the vest to cover one breast. What a freaking lying hypocrite she is.

[RedstDem]

19. I Feel Sorrry For This Dumb Dumb

Her Outer Beauty Has Not Benefited From Joining The Pageant, I Submit She Looks Terrible Now Considering What She Started With..Lol
Her Inner Beauty Is Non Existent Judging By The Garbage That Spills From Her Mouth.

[Zen Democrat]

5. I feel sorry for the news consumer.

Let me see if I have this straight: This ambitious model without a registerable IQ offered an opinion at a beauty contest based on her version of "Biblican inerrancy" and became a "Christian spokesmodel" with the "controversy" compounded by the existence of semi-nude photos of her being released that were taken BEFORE she was strutting semi-nude in said beauty contest that happens to be owned by Donald Trump, after his "pageant" paid for her to get a boob job. Case closed.

[secondwind]

7. don't feel sorry for her.....it looks like she has a shot at being "Mrs Trump #4)

----- did anyone notice how he "squeezed" her right silicone to his chest several times as they stood very close to each other (he had that "dazed" look of concentration).....

Both of them are prostitutes.

[Eric J in MN]

8. If the semi-nude photos had been intended for publication, then...

...they would have been published before this week.

[rocktivity]

20. The photos weren't published, therefore they weren't taken?

If her pageant contract specifically said NO NUDE OR SEMI-NUDE PHOTOGRAPHY, she entered the pageant under false pretenses. She posed for those photos and knew they existed--that alone is enough to put her in breach of her contract.

:eyes:
rocktivity

[OwnedByFerrets]

10. And that damned wind.....blew her top open but was

stealthy enough not to muss her hair.:rofl:

[Bluenorthwest]

12. Here is some blunt talk

People who get photographed for a living have many well known tricks to avoid showing body parts that are off limits...what you do, is you duct tape your nipples, or whatever. This is standard practice for shots like the one in question. Even those who are willing to show a nipple, for example, expect to be compensated for that and do not wish to be tricked into it, or to serve up that assest accidentally. That which is not paid for and agreed to is made visually off limits, especially by the 'modest religious types' who claim they would not do it for money. There are many who actually will not, and they know how to make sure they don't. Duct tape makes showbiz work in oh so many ways, and this is one that every potential nude knows.
Duct tape. It's what's for dinner.

[Eric J in MN]

13. She could have used tape, but if the photographer seemed trustworthy to her,

...and she wasn't uptight about her body, and didn't know that she would be famous, then it might have seemed like an unnecessary precaution after he promised not to seek publication of semi-nude photos from the session (assuming he made such a promise, I don't know what was said).

If she trusted the photographer, that wasn't completely stupid on her part, since he apparently kept the photos private at the time.

On "America's Next Top Model" there have been seasons where the girls are photographed in the nude with the expectation that photos which show their private areas won't be published.

[Bluenorthwest]

15. Well America's Top is an excellent example, of reality

On America's Top, they are not working under an 'expectation' but under a contract. They are not making assumptions. They have it in writing. That agreement is with a large established business, with assests and a stake in their own good reputation. They are very above board, but there is still a contract in play.
Some free lance photog without a written agreement? Not even in the same league. And yet she had no contract to protect her, and also took no personal precautions that thousands of others before her have taken.

[Eric J in MN]

18. I agree with your point that 'America's Next Top Model' wouldn't want to ruin their reputation...

...by selling nude photos of the contestants.

However, I doubt that the contestants were able to demand that the producers sign anything. The show is famous. Contestants aren't famous before a season is broadcast. The producers probably finish filming a season before the first episode of the season airs.

I also doubt that the producers would put anything in the contract which the contestants sign other than words to the effect of "We can do whatever we want, and you excuse us from any and all liability."

[ksoze]

14. I feel sorry for Miss USA - remember the actual winner?

this runner up attention hound (I wanted to use another word) from California has sucked all of the attention from the actual winner. i guess the winner will need to show some nip to get back the attention...

[Eric J in MN]

16. I can't name this year's Miss USA, but I can't name last year's Miss USA, either. NT

NT

[Cha]

21. I saw a clip of her on Jon Stewart's

last night and she was blaming the weather..the Satan Wind!

What a poor excuse for miss California that trump kept on even though she lied about her photos and is on the hate trail.

And, trump threw a strawman in there to cover it up.

[JerseygirlCT]

22. And you know, he did that because he was persecuting her and

denying her free speech rights.

Um... or something like that.

She's pathetic, though I don't feel in the least sorry for her, I'll admit.