Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So about this California Supreme Court...conservative, liberal...?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:06 PM
Original message
So about this California Supreme Court...conservative, liberal...?
Edited on Mon May-25-09 11:22 PM by BluegrassDem
I know California has had a bunch of Republican governors, so can anyone tell what kind history this court has with regard to civil rights, gay rights, etc? Is it a slam dunk they'll overturn Prop 8 or could it be a split court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only one of the seven was appointed by a Democratic governor.
Though I wouldn't say to let that dampen your hopes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's more likely they'll uphold it
Which is probably the correct legal decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, not probably the correct legal decision...IMO.
I hope that they'll find that the citizenry cannot revise the constitution by the ballot initiative process, not in a way that restricts the rights of the few through a popular vote of a majority.

There are three questions:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Proposition 8 Cases

Background
California voters approved Proposition 8, a state ballot initiative, at the November 4, 2008, statewide election. Proposition 8 added a new section to the state Constitution which provides that "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." The day after the election, three lawsuits challenging Prop. 8 were filed directly in the California Supreme Court.

On November 19, 2008, the Supreme Court agreed to hear those cases. The court directed the parties to brief and argue the following issues:
(1) Is Proposition 8 invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California Constitution?
(2) Does Proposition 8 violate the separation of powers doctrine under the California Constitution?
(3) If Proposition 8 is not unconstitutional, what is its effect, if any, on the marriages of same-sex couples performed before the adoption of Proposition 8?

In the order accepting the cases for review, the Supreme Court also denied a request to stay the operation of Proposition 8 pending the court's resolution of the cases, granted the motion of the official proponents of Proposition 8 to intervene in the action, and established an expedited briefing schedule. Briefing in the Supreme Court was completed on January 21, 2009. All briefs are available online on the Prop 8 page.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Check this link at 10:00 a.m. PST tomorrow, 7:00 a.m. Eastern. http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme /

The full copy of the opinion will be available here: http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions /

I'm cautiously optimistic. Logic tells me that 2, if not 1 and 2, are very convincing arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I agree and I too am cautiously optomistic

The idea that civil rights is something that can be given and taken away by ballot is offensive to judicial review.

What happens if it is passed by initiative can it then be taken away the next time?

Doesn't make sense once you accept the premise that it is a civil right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's not at all certain...
... but they were the ones who overturned the ballot initiative that declared marriage to be between a man and a woman in the first place. That decision was based on the State Constitution though, which can apparently be changed as easily as a ballot measure can pass...

Here's to hoping that previous equal rights amendments will be judged as having to be overturned first, before this "separate and unequal" provision of the Constitution can go into effect.

I'd be interested to see if my fellow Californians would be willing to overturn all equal rights protections in order to define marriage as being between a man and a woman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think they will uphold Prop 8, but also uphold the marraige license of those married already. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. From what I've read
I agree with you. But, very unfortunate that big states like CA and NY couldn't follow the recent momentum from smaller states legalizing gay marriage.:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. CA did legalize gay marriage. It was the morman church which
stuck their collective noses in our state and created this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC