Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How to easily debunk the stupid RW talking point on Sotomayor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:00 PM
Original message
How to easily debunk the stupid RW talking point on Sotomayor
Every single stupid RWer I encounter appears to believe she was overturned 60% of the time. I'm guessing Sean or Limbaugh told them.

Sotomayor had 5 opinions reviewed by the supreme court. 3 were overturned. She has written 380.

If the Supreme Court denies Writ than the opinion is upheld. Therefore she has actually had 99.2% of her opinions upheld. Not 60% overturned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. they both push it
what the dumb fucks don't check is how do other judges stack up to the 60%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The US Supreme Court overturns 75% of the cases they choose to hear.
Edited on Thu Jun-04-09 09:04 PM by Ian David
Sotomayor actually had SIX opinions reviewed by The USSC and 3 were overturned. That's 50%. That's 25% better than average.

Last week Limbaugh was saying it was 80%.

Now he's down to saying 60%.

But he won't admit it's a percentage of the cases the court chose to review. Limbaugh is saying it's 60% of all her cases.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I was wondering why half of them were saying 80%
Edited on Thu Jun-04-09 09:05 PM by AllentownJake
and half 60%.

Must have missed their Rush this week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You gotta listen to The Limbaugh Lie of The Day Podcast!
See below:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Or Ask Them If A Summa Cum Laude Editor Of The Yale Law Review
Isn't good enough for the Supreme Court, then who the hell is?

If the reich-wing lizarbrains really can't see anything beyond their white-male resentment complexes, then that's even more of a reason why we need affirmative action in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. PLEASE remember:
The decisions that she drafted are those for the entire court on which she sat; the COURT made the decision, and a member of the court, sometimes Judge Sotomayor, drafted decisions for the court; sometimes, others did so. The entire court approved her drafts, some members may have suggested changes/edits.

The only decisions that were entirely hers were those made when she sat as a District Court judge, that is, a trial court judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC