Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The great irony about all the smears against single-payer is that it's NOT gov't-run health care!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 04:58 PM
Original message
The great irony about all the smears against single-payer is that it's NOT gov't-run health care!
It's physician and nurse-run health care!

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep. It's a government version of Blue Cross or Aetna.
They are an INSURER, just like Blue Cross is an insurer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is Incredibly Basic
and I can't believe so many people haven't picked up on it.

Or maybe not, since no one ever seems to point it out in the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Would you rather have physician and nurse-run health care
or insurance company-run health care? That's the question I don't hear the talking heads asking. Instead they have people mouthing off about wanting their "provider" to make decision and that's their reason for avoiding single payer. Someone needs to say that right now it's the insurance companies making the decisions.

Oops. Ed is saying just this right now. He's been great on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I prefer a claims adjuster rather than a doctor to decide if I need heart surgery.
Edited on Tue Jun-09-09 05:19 PM by valerief
NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. correct and in the German system there is no GVT burreacracy either


payments are made to competing non profits who administer the plans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Germany is multi-payer, though. It's universal, but not single-payer.
Edited on Tue Jun-09-09 05:22 PM by Occam Bandage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The government collects the revenue, everyone pays the same percent of income.

The government sets the parameters of care.


You select the non profit that will service your benefits.


the non profit pays the provider.



Is that correct?


Seems like a good way to guard against needless bureacratic growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, it can be, like Britain has. It can be private-run, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. It *increases* patient freedom.
No more having to figure out which insurance company covers what doctors. Like anybody would miss that goat-fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doodadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Having this discussion with a Repug friend now.......
He says: "First, Obama's going to cover 14 Million illegal immigrants and healthcare will be rationed. Just like taxes, 50% of the population will pay for all of this for the other half plus the illegals."

Did I miss something? Where does any proposal say we're covering illegals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Do you suppose that we will
turn them away from the ER or the ICUs because they are illegals. Do you suppose that when an illegal immigrant female is about to deliver the newest U.S. citizen, that we will throw her out of maternity. Not on your life. Yes we will pay for these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. Its government run insurance, like Unemployment inurance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC