Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Landrieu signed letter saying she supported public plan before she was against it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 08:16 PM
Original message
Landrieu signed letter saying she supported public plan before she was against it
Edited on Tue Jun-09-09 08:17 PM by DrToast
I wonder who got to her.


Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) pledged her support for a public health care option in April, two months before she announced opposition to such a plan, according to a signed letter she sent to a major reform coalition dated April 11.

Read the letter, obtained by the Huffington Post, here.

"I'm not open to it. I'm not open to a public option," Landrieu told the Huffington Post early Tuesday afternoon. "However, I will remain open to a compromise, a full compromise. Public option is not something that I support. I don't think it's the right way to go."

.....

Landrieu had told the coalition Health Care for America Now (HCAN) in April that she supported a public option, which would compete against private plans. She signed a pledge that she supported a "choice of a private insurance plan, including keeping the insurance you have if you like it, or a public insurance plan without a private insurer middleman that guarantees affordable coverage."

Landrieu went even further and drafted a letter to HCAN specifically spelling out her support for a public option.

"HCAN principles embody an approach that actually delivers a solution of guaranteed quality, affordable health care for all in America. Under this approach, everyone gets a choice of health insurance plans, including the right to keep your current insurance, choose another private plan or to join a public health insurance plan," she wrote in April.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/09/signed-letter-from-landri_n_213447.html


She needs to get the Ben Nelson treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. She flips often. I don't know anything about her except
I don't like her because she's so wishy-washy. Is there anything she'll stick to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thom Hartmann said the same thing today, that both she and
Ben Nelson need to go. The Democrats need to run more progressive candidates in their place in the next primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. What good would that do LA and NE
aren't particularly liberal states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I dunno. Thom's more intelligent than me. He's more intelligent
than most people. I trust his judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, he can't be all that smart if he thinks a progressive
democrat could win in either LA or NE...

All you have to do is look at the demographics and you will see two very conservative, transitional states.

The thing about blue dog democrats is that they allow the party to attain majority standing so that they can control how, what and when the legislative process works...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Somehow I disagree. You might as well just
get a Republican because that is what you've got. The trouble is in Washington DINOs, Republican Lites, Blue Dogs, whatever the term, screw up the caucus. At least if you know they are Republicans, then you know where they belong. Instead you end up with watered down legislation to please them. I'm done with that. Other states have gotten around that by running their progressives as independents in conservative states. One of our progressives in my conservative county runs as an independent, which gets her the job, yet we can count on her to do the right thing. For some reason or the other the Republicans haven't a clue. All they know is that she doesn't have a D after her name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. A Republican isn't going vote with you 70-80%
Edited on Tue Jun-09-09 10:12 PM by SpartanDem
of the time, you replace Blue Dogs with real GOP that means you don't pass legislation like Lilly Ledbetter. There seems to be the mindset amoungst a large portion of DU that if you run progressive candidates in conservative states that people are going to have an awakening. If you think you're tired of watered down legislation for blue dogs let see how you feel when you can't even get that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. The letter should be published in every paper in her district
Ads should be run on TV in her district calling her out on this.

And every one in Congress should get the same treatment for opposing public health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. That was before she got the check in the mail
from the health industry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Jeezus is she worthless or what?
that's one of the most blatant and overt flip flops I've ever seen.

Why does this spineless POS even bother to call herself a Dem. She'd stand a better hance of re-election as a republicon and she could be even more overt in her spinelessness.

Perhaps she's as dumb as she is cowardly.

Ya know we have a lot of Dems like that. Especially in the Senate. Starting with Joe Loserman.

And to make matters worse the leader is the biggest invertebrate of all.

Obama really needs to kick some ass on the hill if he wants any of his legislative program to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. She's in a red state. I expect she'd be voted out if she went along w/a public option. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC