Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's healthcare lacks votes: Senator Feinstein

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 03:45 PM
Original message
Obama's healthcare lacks votes: Senator Feinstein
Don't count on her voting for anything resembling decent health care reform; she's going to be a thorn in our side.


Obama's healthcare lacks votes: Senator
Posted June 21, 2009 4:30 PM
The Swamp

by Mark Silva

Storm warnings on the healthcare reform front:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California said today that President Barack Obama may lack the votes in the Senate necessary to push the healthcare reform he wants this summer.

"Well to be candid with you, I don't know that he has the votes right now,'' the senator said in an appearance on CNN's State of the Union today. "I think there's a lot of concern in the Democratic caucus.''

With Republicans such as Sens. Charles Grassley of Iowa and Richard Lugar of Indiana warning about the costs of everything the federal government already has done this year, Democrats may be reticent to vote for another trillion-dollar plan.

"Sen. Lugar's point about the economy, the trillions of dollars that have gone into buttressing the economy, now we're going to be dealing with regulation of the financial sector.,'' Feinstein told CNN's John King. "What all of the impact of this is not yet known.

"You have enormous problems in my state,'' Feinstein added. "California's bigger than the populations of 21 states and the District of Columbia put together.

"We have an enormous health care industry, 350 hospitals. University of California alone has 34,000 health care workers, has health care worth $4 billion a year. So it's complicated. Additionally, the state is in a state of financial catastrophe. I think that's clear. So, if you change the Medicaid rate, for example, it has an impact on California between $1 billion and $5 billion a year. Now, how could I support that? Because it would take down the state.


more...

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/06/obamas_healthcare_lacks_votes.html#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go to hell, Feinstein, you Repuke. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. this worries me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. She worries me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a duplicate of another thread in this same forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. And Peter Orzag says all they need is 50 votes with Biden being the tie
breaker even though the Repukes might filibuster. Who cares. I don't know who to believe any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy
If the Dems would all vote for it, we wouldn't have a problem. She's part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's a game of "good cop/bad cop."
Except it's getting harder and harder to tell who the good cops are, or who is covering for who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder how many insurance companies
she has on her political payroll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. How can she say that when
Their has been no plan presented by the Senate? NOTHING Has been presented yet.

There a ton of different ideas out there right now and nothing is sorted out. I find this completely disingenuous of her to say that. Time to call her office in the morning... This is getting ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. CYA?
This is the kind of statement that is used by politicians to cover their own ass when they want to kill a particular piece of legislation without really having to vote against it. They just claim that the votes aren't there and then refuse to bring the legislation up for a vote. The Democrats could learn something from the ideologues on the conservative side in this case. Sometimes you have to bring things to a vote even though you know your going to lose so you can get your opposition (or the opposition in your own party) to actually vote against something that the people really want. Why is it that when the Republicans are in control they have no problem running roughshod over everybody to get what they want (not that I totally support that kind of action but if you believe in your cause enough sometimes it is a legitmate method to get legislation passed) but when the Democrats get power they start fighting each other and resort to whining about not having enough votes? If you can pass the regular way then do it, if you have to resort to using reconciliation so all you need is 50 + Biden then do it. As far as filibustering Republicans I have two words in relation to that 'Nuclear Option' and no threat just do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Doing Reform means cutting Medicaid and Medicare. The Dems
have been horrific. We hear about the cuts and not one
person has explained what the people on Medicare are supposed
to do while we wait 10 years for the Health Program to take
effect completely.

When you reform you had better be informing the people continuously.

All the states are in financial difficulty. What are the people
on Medicaid, Medicare suppose to do????
Feinstien is only looking out for her state.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. She's supposed to look out for her state
But, apparently, she's not considering the benefits that insuring the 6.3 million uninsured Californians will bring back at least 1-2 billion (if not quite a bit more) to the state's economy which should balance out any potential loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. they want to fund healthcare?

raise taxes on the rich, you morons!



i'm so sick of hearing about cost or health. but you have enough money to bail out banks?

Goddamn crooks! I'm so sick of you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nancy Pelosi AND Senator Barbara Boxer Support A Public Option
Edited on Sun Jun-21-09 05:30 PM by TomCADem
So, there is absolutely no reason why a public option cannot be implemented in a manner that is fair to Calfornia, since so many prominent members of Congress from California support such an option. Senator Feinstein's opposition is B.S. Also, California's labor issues, which translate into financial issues, are due in large part to healthcare costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I didn't know where Sen. Boxer stood, though I'm not surprised. Her
support makes Feinstein look even more disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Boxer clearly stands for the public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Dems in Congress better come to terms with the 72% that want a public option.
Or voters will abandon what has essentially become in Congress a one-party system for a third party that actually listens to the will of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. never understood trying to get repubs on board when you have so many
sorry ass dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. ain't that the truth? they are sorry ass indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. I think so too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. Case and point while single-payer has zero chance of happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. Flood the DSCC mailbox with this message:
Health care without the public option will put you back in the minority.
Not one more dime until health care with the public option is passed.
This bribe taking shit has to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. I have no problem saying something along those lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. Diane, SHUT UP AND GET THE VOTES!
For once in your life be a Democrat, Diane. Get the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Fuck you Di Fi.... again...
She is without question one of the worst people in the Senate. At least the Repig Senators are consistent in being Republicans. Di Fi acts like a Democrat until it gets "difficult".

From being a warmonger to being a corporate sell-out, she is consistently not on our side.

Her response on the healthcare worker numbers and the plan somehow bringing down California, she knows she's lying. Her pockets are full of Pharma and Insurance money... and she has no conscience to even admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
26. I wish she didn't have the votes.
She's been a smeghead forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC