Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Chris Dodd: I now support marriage equality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 12:40 PM
Original message
Senator Chris Dodd: I now support marriage equality
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/11621/senator-chris-dodd-i-now-support-marriage-equality

I was just contacted by Adam Wells of Sen. Chris Dodd's (D-CT) office who wanted to let Blenders know that the Senator has changed his mind about marriage equality and sent on an op-ed written for the The Meriden Record-Journal explaining his evolution on the matter. It's odd, isn't it, that our President has moved in the opposite direction since his days running for the U.S. Senate. The constitutional law prof supported marriage equality then, but now "God is in the mix."
Sen. Dodd and Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA, who voted for DOMA) have moved in the direction of equality. Why can't our "fierce advocate"?

Rights, Responsibilities and Love
June 21, 2009

Public officials aren't supposed to change their minds. But I firmly believe that it's important to keep learning. Last week, while I was in Connecticut meeting with members of the gay and lesbian community from across the state, I had the opportunity to tell them what I've learned about marriage, and about equality.

While I've long been for extending every benefit of marriage to same-sex couples, I have in the past drawn a distinction between a marriage-like status ("civil unions") and full marriage rights.

The reason was simple: I was raised to believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. And as many other Americans have realized as they've struggled to reconcile the principle of fairness with the lessons they learned early in life, that's not an easy thing to overcome.

But the fact that I was raised a certain way just isn't a good enough reason to stand in the way of fairness anymore.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well good for Dodd.
I assume his poll numbers rang his bell but we'll take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Funny, I thought he was already on board with this.
I mean, good lord, CT has the most progressive gay marriage equality court decision in the country and our state lege has passed it into state law. Our repub governor signed it (never threatened a veto, she knows better). NOW he "comes out" for it! While I'm glad he did, I too assume that same bell you did. He certainly needs every vote he can get, and it ain't gonna ever be with our dwindling supply of RW repubs in the state...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good news. I'm glad to hear that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. good for Dodd, now sponsor some legislation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dodd is still reeling from his CEO compensation blunder
This is pandering, but if it leads him to being a Democratic senator actually sponsoring bills for DADT and DOMA repeals in congress, then I'm for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Of course it's pandering. Just as Obama's position on gay rights is pandering.
It's politics, sadly.

I think if the politicians were honest, a majority of them would support marriage equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Instead of leading, they pander to their constituents' worse instincts and prejudices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC