Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Thinking 'Evolves' on Health Care Requirements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 09:48 AM
Original message
Obama's Thinking 'Evolves' on Health Care Requirements
Source: ABC News

President Discusses Vision on Health Care Reform

Acknowledging that his thinking on the issue has "evolved," President Barack Obama says he could support a law mandating that individuals purchase health care coverage, with fines for those who do not, but he stressed that there must be some kind of waiver for those who are simply unable to afford it.

"People have made some pretty compelling arguments to me that if we want to have a system that drives down costs for everybody, then we've got to have healthier people not opt out of the system," the president said in an exclusive interview with ABC's Diane Sawyer today on "Good Morning America."

During the election campaign, Obama said he was opposed to a federal law mandating the purchase of health care coverage. But earlier this month in a letter to Congressional leaders working on the reform legislation, he said he would consider supporting such a measure, if it has room for exemptions for small businesses and individuals who cannot afford the premiums.

The president would not delve deeply into the nuts and bolts of what he wants included and what he will concede in health care reform legislation, saying it's still early in the process, but he acknowledged that change will not come easily.

"There's a reason why it hasn't been done for 40-50 years," he said. "It's hard." But Obama once again stressed how urgent he believes it is to tackle this issue and said the cost of inaction is too high.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Politics/story?id=7913045&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. My thinking tends to "evolve" about the efficacy of Democratic lawmakers, once they're in office...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. no shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's hard? 'It's hard werk!' Where have I heard that before?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Oh God, no.
Somebody has got to get to him and tell him not to use THAT expression.

Challenging, transformative, complex, involved, complicated, or daunting.

But not "hard".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Really, anything but THAT expression. I agree!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quidam56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. We must have health care reform this year,
As a former health care giver, I am sad to see what has become of health care in America. Clearly Profit Care comes ahead of Patient Care. We must have public option, so what if it puts the greedy bastards out of business. www.wisecountyissues.com/?p=62
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Evolution to anything but a real solution like single-payer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. It has to be mandate unless we really want to refuse to treat anyone who opts out
I'm not ready to let people die due to lack of treatment if they opt out - but that would be an option if its not mandatory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Another betrayal of our growing underclass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. evolved thinking = follow the money nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Exactly (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'd feel much more comfortable...
...if he would just say he'd veto any "reform" that doesn't include a strong public option. I don't think we should be forcing people to buy a health insurance plan from a private company, since it is clear we cannot count on them to control costs. The amount of premiums and copays already seem to be following exponential curve to infinity under our current system. Health insurance needs to be uncoupled from a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. ugh.
is this as far as we're going to go with this?

"During the election campaign, Obama said he was opposed to a federal law mandating the purchase of health care coverage. But earlier this month in a letter to Congressional leaders working on the reform legislation, he said he would consider supporting such a measure, if it has room for exemptions for small businesses and individuals who cannot afford the premiums."

they're going to make us buy insurance? what a boon to the fucking insurance companies! it's their wet dream come true. now everyone will have to give the insurance companies money! (and that $10,000 deductible? well--too bad for us, right?)

i suspect some people might be able to afford the premiums but not the deductibles.

no one will be better off--people won't be treated early and things will be as bad as they are now.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Worse than they are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. One issue I agreed with the Republicans over was "unfunded mandates"
If the government is going to mandate anything they should provide funding for it. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. My thinking has evolved too. Single Payer Now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hugo_from_TN Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. The first civil trial will be interesting.
I have a hard time believing that this would hold up under trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. I'm okay with a mandate, as long as there's a public option
I don't mind being forced to buy health care coverage. But I want to be able to purchase government-run, Medicare-type coverage, at an affordable rate.

Universal mandates are necessary, otherwise the healthy population opts out, leaving only the sick left in the patient pool. That drives up per-patient costs and makes the system unaffordable.

What good would Social Security be if people could opt out? The wealthy and employed would take their money elsewhere, leaving only the poor to rely on-- and fund -- the retirement system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. Devolved is the word for it
This idea of forcing people to buy for profit health insurance is simply terrible. I mean, in my county unemployment is around 12% right now. Underemployment is higher. Few people I know have health insurance, working or not. They would if they could afford it. But they can not. A mandate will not change that fact.

It is high time for them to start talking numbers, what they expect the struggling citizens of this country to contribute to their corporate owners. People are scared about this. People need time to plan for a huge additional tax. Which is what this would be. A tax to benefit a private sector of business. So they need to start letting people know the price of the shakedown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. +10
WTF is wrong with elected Democrats?

This is the problem with you almost needing to be rich to run for office... rich people have absolutely no concept of what regular people struggle with, especially since they likely got rich by keeping you down in the first place. I'm not casting that onto Obama entirely, but let's be fair, he's not exactly Mr. Poor Guy these days.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Yep
Clearly the solution to people not being able to afford something is to require them to pay for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Fuzzy thinking. They really had to work hard to come up with that 'option', I bet.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagertolearn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. I agree and this is why plans like Wydens won't work.
Insurance rates are too high for even those of us who can afford it so to mandate people buy it at anything close to the current rates is terrible. It just won't happen and the insurance companies (and all the GOP) won't support anything that interfers with a few people making money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. Just as I thought. This "bill" is going to end up making it worse that it is now.
"Medicare for all", and fuck all the other bullshit "plans".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
19. Obama's statement doesn't sit well with me.
he said he would consider supporting such a measure, if it has room for exemptions for small businesses and individuals who cannot afford the premiums.


So, some people will still be denied access to affordable health care, they just won't be penalized for not being able to afford coverage. I don't like this at all. Some people will be left out because of an inability to pay which is the system we have now.

I think these geniuses better come up with a better plan than this because this doesn't cut it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
22. Now, I have to pay some insurance executive just to be alive?
With fines if I don't?

What a plum deal... For them!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. the rich have to live somehow
Edited on Wed Jun-24-09 11:45 AM by fascisthunter
may as well off the dead and dying. :sarcasm:

We live in a very sick country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. BULLSHIT!
Hopefully, this will not turn out to be the case.

But you just know it will. We will be put further in harness to service the Aristocratic Elite. And fines if we don't play along with their further enslavement of us.

Fuck them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. 'Fuck them all.'
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I've got a problem with the government
Determining if we have the ability to pay. They seem to forget citizens can't just snap their fingers and have money raining down on them like the Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
29. So Obama is a fascist
Who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. How about the cost of determining if an individual or small business can pay? And, what if you can
pay this week, but lose your job next week?

We have means based testing for Medicare and welfare now. And determining eligibility requires a huge, expensive bureaucracy. Imagine if half the country were applying. And nothing is set up to determine need on the part of a small business. Just figuring out a system for that could take government a few years and lord knows how much money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC