Hoppin_Mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:54 PM
Original message |
Possible ? Is Clark hoping that the Repubs win in 04 ? |
|
So he can run as Hillary's VP in 2008 ? This is a theory gaining ground - and could explain why SO many of his supporters are working SO hard to insure that the front runner and most likely candidate to beat bush* loses.
|
LuminousX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-08-04 08:56 PM by LuminousX
edit - removed unnecessary vitriol
|
quinnox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
2. This is yesterdays memo |
|
"Anyone who doesn't support Dean is a GOP mole" was over many weeks ago.
|
Printer70
(990 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. Don't mischaracterize the argument |
|
It's not that Clark supports the GOP, it's a political calculation to throw 2004, since the DNC/DLC views it unwinnable, and create a Hillary/Clark ticket in 2008.
|
Hoppin_Mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. Damn - Where do I track these latest rumors ? |
|
My sources seem to be stale !
Please don't recommend Drudge, Pigboy, Savage etc. Unlike some here, I will not visit their sites or listen to them.
|
WoodrowFan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Gaining ground among WHO? |
|
Not the most intelligent theory I have ever heard.
|
MIMStigator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. "theory gaining ground" BAAAAAAAHA |
Printer70
(990 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
are in Clark's corner (whatever you think of the theory). That's why he's near the top despite offering no new ideas or having any real charisma.
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Hmmm... well, what's YOUR opinion on this "theory?" |
|
You started the thread, so enlighten us on your opinion.
|
Hoppin_Mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. I don't WANT to believe it ! -nt- |
Printer70
(990 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What is powering Clark? Does anyone wonder why some relatively unknown general with no political experience has vaulted near the top of a field with some very impressive candidates? It's not issues, it's not some unusual charisma, it's not campaign tactics- nothing new in those departments. It's the Clark Arkansas connection. Dean shouldn't have bashed McAulliffe, but that along with Mc's Clinton connection put the DNC in Clark's corner. The DLC has always backed Clark and opposed Dean. I don't think the powers-that-be think Bush can be beaten in 2004- and they want more than anything, Hillary in 2008. A Dean victory in 2004 would remove that possibility. Clark is a stalking horse candidate in the primary and a sacrificial lamb in the general.
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
14. I am powering Clark.... |
|
Yes, lil' me.....yes, I wrote him a letter on June 15th...asking him to run.
These conspiracy theories are what the RW gave us via drudge just so he wouldn't get the nomination. The Repugs know that Dems can sometimes slit our own throat in the name of idealism.
It ain't gonna work this time. RW didn't count on how much we hated Bush.
|
Hoppin_Mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
16. Yup- that's it in a nushell -nt- |
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
won't he AND HIllary be surprised when he's sworn in next January?
|
lapauvre
(387 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I think it's the other way 'round! |
|
Clark came out of the woodwork. If you looked closely at the woodwork he came out of, with a bit of investigation, it looks a lot like Clinton woodwork.
Convenient if Clark gets the nod and appeals to Hillary to give up her senate seat to be VP.
Lovely ticket. I would vote for it in a heartbeat.
|
maddezmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
MINEMAN
(15 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think you listen to right wing radio.
|
Jackhammer Jesus
(415 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Ensure the most likely candidate to beat Bush loses? |
|
You must be mistaken. I can assure you, Clark's doing his best to win the nomination.
Everything was sunshine and lollipops when Dean was the clear frontrunner, but there's tinfoil hats and conspiracies abound now that Clark's started catching up. First there's a media conspiracy to give Clark the nomination, now Clark is trying to win the nomination and LOSE so he can be VP later?
Does anyone here actually think that people are giving their time and money to Clark so he can beat Dean, just to LOSE, so we can do this all over again in 4 years? I hope not.
|
jumptheshadow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Did somebody put windowpane in the Kool-Aid?
|
SeveneightyWhoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Wow, these theories just get worse and worse. |
|
Why do they get propagated here on DU? Shouldn't the rightwingers be worrying about this wacko nonsense?
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Yes, I think I saw that theory on FR. |
|
The love to link the Clintons to anyone. Do you read FR?
|
Moderator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-08-04 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Please do not post inflammatory messages.
Thanks, DU Moderator
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |