Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Social Security COLA's cancelled:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:40 AM
Original message
Social Security COLA's cancelled:
It also talks of how Medicare premiums are going up. Not a good sign at all to see this---and with 2010 being an election year, it makes it worse.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090823/ap_on_go_ot/us_social_security_smaller_checks

Millions face shrinking Social Security payments

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated Press Writer Sun Aug 23, 7:14 pm ET

WASHINGTON – Millions of older people face shrinking Social Security checks next year, the first time in a generation that payments would not rise. The trustees who oversee Social Security are projecting there won't be a cost of living adjustment (COLA) for the next two years. That hasn't happened since automatic increases were adopted in 1975.

By law, Social Security benefits cannot go down. Nevertheless, monthly payments would drop for millions of people in the Medicare prescription drug program because the premiums, which often are deducted from Social Security payments, are scheduled to go up slightly.

"I will promise you, they count on that COLA," said Barbara Kennelly, a former Democratic congresswoman from Connecticut who now heads the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "To some people, it might not be a big deal. But to seniors, especially with their health care costs, it is a big deal."

Cost of living adjustments are pegged to inflation, which has been negative this year, largely because energy prices are below 2008 levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. May I submit that nothing was cancelled?
The COLA is a creature of statute. The COLA goes up on a basis to certain criteria. (Whether or not they are valid criteria is certainly an appropriate subject of debate.)

Anyway, the COLA goes into effect only if ceetain criteria are met. This year they are not. Nothing is being taken away since it is not appropriate to have one under the current statutory regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's true but it probably won't stop FOX, Beck, Limbaugh, etc., from spinning it as
Edited on Mon Aug-24-09 09:49 AM by Love Bug
"Obama's taking your SS money to pay for health care for illegal immigrants!!!!!! The sky is falling!!!

You heard it here first, folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Point taken. Thanks. But no increase will mean the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Then perhaps the OP's title should be corrected.
It was your wording, and it's inaccurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I wish the AP piece had chosen a clearer headline and some background on COLA statute.
Edited on Mon Aug-24-09 10:03 AM by pinto
I realize that the gist of the piece may be that the net effect is less buying power, since Soc Sec payments will remain at 2009 levels. That's true, given cost of living will likely increase in 2010.

The headline, as you note, implies something else.

Soc Sec COLA's vary annually - recently ~ 2 - 3%, this year ('09) it was 5.8% And as you note it's a set statute with a set formula.

(Sometimes I hate how the media presents a story. While the formula is convoluted, the fact that Soc Sec COLA is set by one is pretty simple to understand, if it just gets mentioned. Aghh.)

Thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. That would be nice
but accuracy for them is just wishful thinking. It just makes people think *wrong* things. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. You are so right. When the cost of living is dropping there should be
no COLA. That isn't to say my spouse and I couldn't find a way to spend a COLA if we got one but with gas down, our utility rate down, our property tax down(dropped $11 monthly on one of those programs to average our annual costs), our food bill down almost $60 mo where is there any justification? Even our prescription drug bill is down from $32/mo to $19/mo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Its tied into the cost of living index

by regulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. In the stimulus there was a one time bonus to all SS recipients
This was the equvialent of a COLA adjustment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Good point. I forgot about that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. sorry, that wasn't even close to equaling a monthly raise in pay
from a COLA...but then, it's a shell game anyway...they give it with one hand, and take it back for medicare with the other...so you never even get to break even...and is someone trying to tell me that the cost of living hasn't risen in the last year??? Funny how a loaf of store made french bread has gone from $1.29 to $2.00 and how a 10# bag of C&H sugar has gone from $4.99 to $7.45 and that's just two examples...how about gas, electric and just plain necessities...or loss of house value...like I said..it's all a shell game...watch what this hand is doing, so you don't see what the other hand is stealing from you...wb

(we just thought we had our retirement all figured out, ten years ago, we'd have been fine, presently...we are not so fine)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Actually the one time payment of $250 exceeded several of
the monthly raises from past years. While I wouldn't have any trouble spending an increase, our cost of living has declined pretty significantly. For the first year since we bought into this mobile park in 2002, the space rent has not gone up. The billing rate for electric and sewer (a flat rate charged monthly based on past year's usage) dropped $48 monthly.

We aren't driving any less and we are paying almost $100 less each month for gas. We drive older vehicles and our car insurance premium dropped just over 15%. Our grocery bill is down enough that I've been transfering an additional $150 to savings each month out of our grocery budget. BOA has twice lowered our Visa rate so our cost of credit is down.

Even with the reduction in my TIAA/CREF income, we are in better shape now than we were a year ago because so many of our costs have gone down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. WOW...
sounds like you have it made...are you telling me that you have received less than $20.83 a month COLA on your SS at some time previously?..I must be too old to remember that....I didn't say I was ungrateful for the $250...only that it didn't work out to what a COLA would be....

I'd like to know how you aren't driving less, but you are still saving $100 PER MONTH on fuel costs...Gasoline is still $2.97 a gallon here, and I still live 30 miles from any town in any direction...

Wish my electric would go down $48 a month...and my water too...when I moved in here, water was a $10 flat rate...now it's closer $30, and with a notice a month or so ago, that it could go up again...

I don't know what my car insurance bill will be like, but it hasn't dropped any year up to now...Now true, I could drop full coverage, but at my age, when I am out and about...I want to know I can call a tow truck if need be...w/o it costing me several hundred bucks out of my pocket..before I even consider what it would take to fix my car if it breaks down...

so all things considered...no, my costs are not going down like yours are...no matter what I do..some things are beyond MY control..all I can do is try to keep up...and when prices keep going up locally...then I can't afford to shop local...wb

I'd suggest you should stay where you are...sounds like the right place to be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. First of all.. the cola is dependent upon inflation rates..no inflation, no cola..
(that is the good news).. that is the talking points of the new right wing push to scare seniors.. if you were not aware of that, you have been informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yep...if anything COLA should be negative this year
But the rules says that payments can't decrease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. If Timing Is Anything - This Isn't Good.....
not when Seniors are concerned about health care and this health care reform. I was with my 85y/o Mother yesterday and she was saying she don't know how she could make it if she didn't have SS to rely on. She thanked FDR and was hoping that Obama gets this health reform passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. My mother has been on SS for 30 plus years
and what they giveth in COLA is usually nearly offset buy what they taketh in Medicare. So this year SS will actually be cut after the Medicare deduction, you know the right wingers will convince about 90% of the seniors Obama cut their SS. This is not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Good point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. And while there may be no official rise in the "cost of living"
my Mom's rent went up this month - not much but when all you have is Social Security, any amount is too much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. No amount of explanations will get through to people who will be comparing
this check to that check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theothersnippywshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. Any increase in premiums for Medicare Part B can not exceed the increase in Social Security benefits
So no increase in SS benefit means no increase in Medicare Part B premium. However, this does not apply to premiums for Medicare Part D. So if a SS beneficiary has the premium for Medicare Part D deducted from his or her SS benefit, and if that premium goes up next year, then the SS benefit will be lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. There will be no increase in Part B for 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. This also applies to military retirees
No complaint here but our "raises" are contingent on COLA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spartan61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Any raise in my pension is also dependant on COLA.
As a retired teacher from CT, I don't get SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is bad.
Many seniors live off their SS including my mother. Without the COLA, many seniors will struggle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. COLA means "Cost of Living Allowance". since the Cost of Living has gone down, this is appropriate

When prices are flat, so should COLA increases be.


Please make a valid argument why SS payments should go up when the cost of living hasn't?


You can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. Isn't there certain things that are excluded from the COLA
isn't food and rent excluded from the SS COLA? Neither of them have gone down. Isn't the reason the COLA went down because of gas prices? How many seniors don't drive anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Food sure has gone down around here. Reduced fuel prices
resulted in pretty sharp declines in grocery produce prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. You live in a very special place! Where is that, where the prices of
everything are plummeting? Please let me know, as the opposite is going on around here. Enjoy your mountains of savings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I would like to know where they are myself
food prices went through the roof last year when gas prices were so high and never dropped one red cent when the gas went down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. I live in Lakewood, WA but my sisters in Tacoma and Portland
have both been talking about how much grocery money they are tucking into savings at the end of the month.

My nephew is the food buyer for a Seattle restaurant. He says that their cost of local produce is down substantially compared to last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. I want to know where that is...
you keep saying your grocery costs have gone down so much that you can put an extra $150 a month in the bank...I'd really like to know where that is?? because I guarantee you...it is NOT the norm where I live..and gasoline here is still almost $3.00 a gallon...not much less than it was last year...sure, it's possible to find this or that on sale...but it has to be something you need or want for it to matter..and prices for everything else are either going up or staying the same...wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. I filled our van at $2.69 last Sat. This time last year it was over
$4. I live in Lakewood and shop in Lakewood and Tacoma. My sister in Tacoma has reported similar savings. She has a larger family and does most of her shopping at COSTCO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Yeah...so do I....but
gas is not $2.69 a gallon where I live...and I never paid over $4.00 a gallon for it, even in our little town...come to think of it, I haven't been into town in a week or so...so maybe it has come down(as I said, I don't drive more than I have too)...last time I went to town it was $2.97 a gallon...sugar was $7.49 for 10# and a loaf of fr.bread was $2.00...and steak, somewhere around $7.a pound or gr beef, even the cheap stuff is over $3....LOL...well, let's just say I can't afford to shop locally at those prices...and at Costco...gr.beef used to be $2.79 a pound...now it's $2.99...bagels used to be $3.99 for a two pack of six, and now they are $4.99...that's just a couple prices...and yes, some others have come down..(but then perhaps if I weren't helping support 3 g.kids...I might be doing better financially)wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Food is down from what I can see
Some things I am buying are 20% cheaper than about a year ago. It's kind of amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Not in my area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Food prices aren't down here either
everyone talks about how the prices all went up when fuel prices were high but never dropped when they went down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. We live on Social Security and pension income and it is stretching
farther this year than last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. Cost of living dropped 2.2%
Per Money Talk (I have not confirmed the numbers). Assuming this is true, I am not sure why anyone is shocked by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. And who unrecommends this kind of stuff???? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. watch me
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Ahhhh.
I see what you said about the posters name and post count (I am not that observant). That said, this topic does not upset me, as it is a verifable fact that impacts millions of people (and MANY here). That is all I was getting at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. odd that you worked the topic into your user handle
do you do that here often?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theothersnippywshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Good catch. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. We knew last year that this was going to happen
So please don't try to blame this one on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theothersnippywshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bush and the republican Congress refused to limit increases in premiums
for Medicare Part D (prescription drug benefit) to the amount of the increase in a beneficiary's Social Security benefit as any increase in the premium for Part B is limited. If Part D premium increases were limited in the same way, no one would see a decrease in Social Security benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
46. Yet Congress has no problem voting themselves a raise every year.
They have no problem screwing over seniors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC