jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 07:09 PM
Original message |
How 'bout those teabaggers who both complain about a 1,000 page bill AND quote parts of it? |
|
These RWers who go to the town hall meetings always read supposed parts of "the bill," probably reading print-outs of RW talking points which CLAIM certain provisions are on certain pages. They go on to make some false claim from "the bill" and at the same time, complain about Obama trying to rush this 1,000 page bill through which "nobody read." How can they have it both ways?
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Logic? You're trying to use logic to explain these guys? |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. True. I guess I just wanted to say what I noticed. |
|
Of course what they say is illogical and that's all there is to it.
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I should have used the :sarcasm: thing, too. I can't follow their logic -- and don't have the patience to try!
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
but I knew you were being sarcastic. :hi:
|
Truthiness Inspector
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message |
5. So if a citizen quotes PART of a bill that means... |
|
The representatives, who are responsible for reading ALL of it, have read ALL of it?
How many representatives HAVE read the whole bill? Do you know?
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. No. I'm saying that these people who get talking points, claiming they've even read THAT |
|
part of the actual bill have no right being angry (fake outrage IMO) that Obama is trying to "jam the bill through" that "nobody read." These Congresspeople have aides who read it FOR them-the REAL bill-not talking points from RWers.
|
timeforpeace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |
6. How dare they read it. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. You really think these people got their questions from reading the bill? |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-25-09 08:39 PM by jenmito
And not RW websites CLAIMING those things are in the bill? :rofl:
|
Historic NY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Well someone should asked them what was on the previous or next page.. |
|
bet they can't answer. Its like a kind in school not doing their homework & using only a cheat sheet.
|
Patsy Stone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-25-09 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Which reminds me of an old joke |
|
"Boy, the food at this place is really terrible." "Yeah, I know; and such small portions."
|
tabbycat31
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 08:44 AM
Response to Original message |
12. the teabaggers were crashing Pallone's townhall last night |
|
they kept telling him to read the bill.
He WROTE the bill.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |