Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: CBS News Concludes It Was Misled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 06:38 AM
Original message
NYT: CBS News Concludes It Was Misled
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/20/politics/campaign/20guard.html
CBS News Concludes It Was Misled on National Guard Memos, Network Officials Say

After days of expressing confidence about the documents used in a "60 Minutes'' report that raised new questions about President Bush's National Guard service, CBS News officials have grave doubts about the authenticity of the material, network officials said last night.

The officials, who asked not to be identified, said CBS News would most likely make an announcement as early as today that it had been deceived about the documents' origins. CBS News has already begun intensive reporting on where they came from, and people at the network said it was now possible that officials would open an internal inquiry into how it moved forward with the report. Officials say they are now beginning to believe the report was too flawed to have gone on the air.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. CBS should admit they were scammed by Karl Rove....
"yes, we fell for Mr. Rove's efforts to muddy the waters concerning George W. Bush's desertion of the TANG and we regret it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think probably one of two things happened.
Either:
1) Rove planted them. This would explain how that freeper GOP lawyer knew how to discredit them so quickly--he was given the info and told to blog it and start the ball rolling. This would also explain why the White House would just accept them and pass them out--they knew this was coming.

or

2) Burkett lost his mind and decided to take it to the next level. If this is the case, I'm freaking pissed because we had Bush even without the memos and now all the focus is on the memos and people will think that none of it is true when in actuality, it's all true, it's just that these particular memos aren't. But it will change the focus now.

I'm hoping it's Rove and not Burkett.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. There's always a third possibility....
That they're accurate, truthful, came from Killian's files, and CBS executives are taking heat from the White House and Bush-supporting advertisers and are going to sacrifice, once again, the unprofitable news division.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Buckhead (aka The Freeper) knew within 20 mins...
of CBS posting the documents. And his post read like: "20 steps North, 5 steps towards the Big Oak, and then dig like mad."

The man had a map.

And that's how I knew from Day One that the documents were a plant. And it was only confirmed when the RW press JUMPED all over the story. They KNEW that a critical examination would reveal the documents were phony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Read and reread this reply by Junkdrawer!
It is "NOT" :tinfoilhat: !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I think you're right.
This guy knew too quickly. He was told ahead of time and told what to say. The more I think about it, the more I think they were Rove plants.

Just like when Rove planted a bug in his own office in that Texas race and blamed it on the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. I think Rove used Burkett the same way he used JH Hatfield
and got the same result.

Burkett has had an ax to grind against Bush at least since the late '90s when he said Bush staff destroyed National Gaurd doc.

Hatfield, you probably remember, claimed that Rove was the source of his info on W's cocaine use. Taking him at his word, critics allege that Rove gave him the information knowing that Hatfield's past could be used to descredit him (and the coke story) after the book was published.

Here's the scenario with CBS: Burkett receives documents (from an anonymous source) that prove what he's been claiming all along is true. He sends them on to CBS, which, considering the source (Burkett) believes them to be legit. The White House also (interestingly) does not challenge the authenticity of the documents when CBS sends them for their review.

CBS goes forward with the story, Rove gives Buckhead (a Far-Right activist) information that challenges their authenticity and, now CBS is forced to concede that the docs are fake.

Not only does this descredit "the Liberal Media" :eyes: and their attempt to bring down Our Fearless Leader, but it also calls into question Burkett's credibility and obfuscates the real story about Bush's military service (or lack thereof). Throw in suspicions (unfounded as they are) that the Democrats played a role in this, and, voila, Bush hits the trifecta yet again:

CBS--humiliated
Burkett--discredited
Kerry/Democrats--smeared in the minds of rightwing sheep as playing a role

And the grandprize: Bush's dirty military record gets buried.

What a wonderful day. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Who would have had the REAL memos...
Killian's former secretary, Marian Carr Knox, said the memos contents were mostly accurate. And that means that someone retyped the things and added the sig line using real documents.

Now, these were Killian's private memos. Wouldn't Killian's wife have had possession after her husband's death? And Killian's wife has come out as a Bush supporter.

Here's what I think: Rove went to everyone involved in the story and did a document round up. Killian's wife gave Rove the documents. Rove retypes them and then sends them out to anti-Bush vets knowing they will make their way to the press in an election year.

Where did Rove get the idea for the sting? Perhaps there are similar flaws in the documents he constructed. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Exactly--Rove played Rather for a fool.
However, let's not lose sight of the fact that CBS is in this pickle because they fucked up royally and disregarded the advice of their own experts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Oh, CBS is completely responsible for being too greedy
Edited on Mon Sep-20-04 09:13 AM by deutsey
in its desire to scoop the competition on this. If they went forward with this story with the reservations they had, these reservations should have been part of the story. How difficult would it have been for Rather to say,

"Although we received these documents from what we consider to be an impeccable source, and although the White House has not challenged the authenticity of them, questions have been raised about..." and then go on to point out what some experts were saying.

Jeesh. And they get paid how much? And I get paid how much? I've worked as a reporter and I always tried to include questions or concerns from all sides in a story I wrote. Shoddy work by CBS and Rather. Shoddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stew225 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. I will forego my post in deference to that
all-important theme/meme of positivity. It also enables me to still exercise at least a portion of the illusion of free speech on these boards. Have a great day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abrock Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why even post that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briemann Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is impossible!
What about Buckhead? He knew! Someone else MUST be outraged!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. OBVIOUS and BODACIOUS! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Hi briemann!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. certainly odd with hours all across web forgies
but another thought is by that night or early morning alll the news channel were reporting fraud. they didnt set back and wait for confirmation. they didnt have to "find" the story like they have to with so many other stories. they were all united in forgies and attack of cbs. had to all be organized and set up and ready to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why would Karl and friends wish to discredit Dan Rather?
Because the GOPers knew that, if Dan Rather asked the tough questions during any of the prime time presidential debates coming up, that Bush would be toast! The Bushcos are wanting Wolf, Tim and Chris to give Bush a chance to keep on lying and selling his line of pure bullshit! Ask yourself, about the amount of time it's taking Bush to agree to the terms of the debates? The chickenhawks are chickening out, on letting Dangerous Dan loose on their show chimp on prime time TV!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Revenge for 41.
Rather and Bush 41 had a beef.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good. Let's talk about Iraq/Plame/Chalabi/WMDs
Edited on Mon Sep-20-04 08:08 AM by WilliamPitt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. Team Kerry's wimps say "duhhhhh." They had the chance to turn it around.
just by saying from the begininning, "we don't know if these are real or fake. But we do know funny things happen when Karl Rove is invilved with campaigns." Rove would have then attacked us for saying it, and there would have been stories on the bull shit he pulls in every election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC