jumpstart33
(328 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-04 07:52 AM
Original message |
We need to see more Wes Clark beside Kerry and Edwards |
|
Reminds people of the stark difference in a Kerry administration over the dark siders of the Bush administration.
BRING THE SOLDIERS HOME!!!
|
Justice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-04 07:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Wes Clark is a guy that has worked on these issues, and can speak with |
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-04 07:57 AM
Response to Original message |
2. With the new commercials coming out today about the economy, I think it's |
|
going to be a week or two before you see Clark standing next to Kerry on a stage.
I think they're going to see what happens to the polls when the steer public thinking away from war and towards the economy, jobs, healthcare, insurance companies, etc.
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. You missed the recent articles evidently |
|
See this thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x841531It doesn't sound like the economy will play as big a role as we heard a couple weeks ago. The Clinton players are pushing a different strategy.
|
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Clark was my VP choice for the weight he would have added to the ticket regarding security and terrorism. I think seeing more him with Kerry would improve Kerry's numbers.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-20-04 08:18 AM
Response to Original message |
|
He should be a Kerry talking head on every network and every show until the election. He should introduce Kerry at every rally. He must be in the forefront in this campaign. Kerry's perceived "weakness" is the war on terror/Iraq/Homeland Security. Wes would help change that delusional perception. IMCPO
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message |