Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colorado Senate: Salazar (D) 53% Coors (R) 42%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 09:39 PM
Original message
Colorado Senate: Salazar (D) 53% Coors (R) 42%
Very good news since this is a seat to replace Ben Nighthorse Campbell, a Republican.

I got this from daily kos.

http://www.dailykos.com/

Anyway, recent polls give Dems solid leads in two states which currently have GOP congressmen--Illinois (natch)and Colorado.

We are also leading by smaller margins in Alaska (Knowles) and Oklahoma (Carson).

In the southern states where several Democrats are retiring we continue to have a clear lead in North Carolina--latest poll I saw had Bowles up by 10 points. Also Castor is up by 4 points in Florida. Tennenbaum is running a couple of points behind in SC, but is closing in. The only seat which seems probable to change hands is Georgia.

So all in all, I think we are doing pretty well in the Senate races, so far.

P.S.
My "upset" prediction is that in the closing days Hoeffel will come on strong and defeat Mr. "Magic Bullet" himself, Arlen Specter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sweet!
Good news about Salazar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. A note about Specter
he does worse in presidential election years, he just barely won his first election in '80 and also barely won in '92, go get em Hoefel. I think Alaska could also be ours too, if Knowles keeps it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, but when Diebold finds out...
...it will be a whole new ballgame. The GOP will then need to tailor the polls to reflect the upcoming Colorado coup.

Lori Price
http://www.legitgov.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. this is great news!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. This would cancel out the loss of Edward's seat . . .
but not Kerry's. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Erskine Bowles
is going to win the Edwards seat, so we're not losing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hope not. Fingers crossed for re-taking the Senate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Dems will have a special election
it was passed over Gov. Romney's veto. I think if Kerry is elected, Dems have a good chance at winning special election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Isn't this a bit of an indicator of the Pres race as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. A lot of people who will vote for Salazar might vote straight Dem.
That's because a lot will be lazy and just go straight Dem which will help Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. a lot
but not everyone. Where it helps Kerry, he could bring a lot of Lationo voters to the polls for the first time. These are likely to be mostly straight ticket voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. interestingly Kerry was elected in '84 to the Senate while Reagan
was winning Massachusetts. That year Gore was elected to senate in Tennessee while Reagan won the state and in Iowa Harkin won while Reagan was winning, so people do split tickets. But it is always helpful to have strong statewide candidates-especially in close elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. FANTASTIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I was also reading something about some kind of really nasty "sexual" scandal breaking around a Repug in Oklahoma (anyone?), where they are overly concerned about such issues as opposed to say, bombing babies.

I think putting a beer magnate on the Republican ticket is kind of a dangerous move. Many of the fringe Repugs are against all alcohol. This might be causing a problem.

What do you think? Can we get the Senate back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. this poll from a Republican polling firm
which makes it even better! Kind of a low sample, though.

Salazars's ad campaign has been very good here - Coors just comes across as out of touch (which he is). All Coors talks about are more tax cuts and how they'll help the economy. Since we've had nothing but tax cuts here (going back to Owens gutting of state gov't.) and the economy is still completely in the toilet, Coors just looks stupid.

There's one Salazar ad that has Coors dressed in a tux at some high society function - really good at showing the Coor's campaign attempts at portraying their candidate as some kind of down home country boy for what they are - bullshit. Or is that horseshit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Coors' ads are pathetic...
"Congress is bad... bad... they're lawyers and they waste your money... I'm a Republican... you won't have to pay a cent..."

Wait a minute... isn't the Congress controlled by Republicans like you?

"Um... I like my grandkids"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Very good news indeed
We must take control of the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Just like his pissy beer as my dear old Dad would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. So long Petie.
Another dumbass bites the dust.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. i really want Salazar to confront coors on his ads vs family values
you dont know how many moms now wont let children watch football with fathers or even let fathers watch football because of the disgusting coors commercials. i want to know from this man who so talks family values why putting soft porn on saturday and sunday afternoon during the football games for greed meets family values
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-04 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. Don't make the same mistake as 2002
Believing polls showing a decisive "against the grain" trend in a particular state. We are not ahead 11 points in a Colorado senate race, similarly any polls in Oklahoma or Alaska are likely to underestimate GOP strength just like a New York or California poll tends to underestimate Democratic numbers in senate races. Just check the Shumer and Hillary margins compared to the final polls.

In 2002, we thrilled at a chance to increase our senate majority when the battleground races were in these states: Georgia, North Carolina, Texas, New Hampshire, Colorado, Missouri, South Dakota, Tennessee, Arkansas and Minnesota. The runaway optimism looks downright silly when considering the partisan tendencies of those states. Minnesota, of course, was a tragic situation which went against the state trend that would have held up otherwise.

We won in Arkansas when the GOP incumbent imploded and we had a superior candidate with great name recognition and respect. The GOP candidates in Colorado, Oklahoma and Alaska all feature baggage to outright ineptitude, but in those states it's not necessarily fatal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I agree.
Edited on Sun Sep-19-04 08:52 AM by coloradodem2004
But Salazar is well-known and well-respected on both sides. Coors does not have nearly as high a favorability as Salazar. Hopefully on election day, the people of Colorado will realize what Ken Salazar has done for them and elect him to the senate.

That being said, we cannot get too cocky. 2002 was a horrible year. Strickland looked like he was going to win and he lost. I am hoping that this does not happen to Salazar but it does worry me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC