Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Helen Thomas to Gibbs: "Has the president given up on the PO?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:03 AM
Original message
Helen Thomas to Gibbs: "Has the president given up on the PO?"
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 11:05 AM by freddie mertz
Helen Thomas: "I Want Your Conscience to Bother You"

(CBS/ AP)
Syndicated columnist Helen Thomas today told White House press secretary Robert Gibbs at his daily press briefing that she keeps asking about the public health care option because she wants his "conscience to bother" him.

Thomas pressed Gibbs on whether the White House was actively supporting the creation of a public, or government-run, plan in negotiations over health care legislation. The public option is supported by liberal Democrats in Congress but opposed by Republicans and some moderate Democrats.

President Obama has said he supports the public option but signaled that he would sign a bill that does not include it.

"Has the president given up on the public option?" Thomas asked, prompting Gibbs to suggest she asks the question every day.

"I ask it day after day because it has great meaning in this country, and you never answer it," Thomas said.

"I apparently don't answer it to your satisfaction," Gibbs said with a smile, prompting Thomas to say, "that's right."


When Gibbs began saying, "I'll give you the same answer that I gave you unsatisfactorily for many of those other days," Thomas interrupted, asking, "Well, is he going to fight for it or not?"

"We're going to work to get choice and competition into health care reform," Gibbs said.

Replied Thomas: "You're not going to get it."

"Well, then why do you keep asking me?" asked Gibbs, to laugher from the press corps.

Said Thomas: "Because I want your conscience to bother you."

A visibly flustered Gibbs then said, "I -- well! Should we sit down and I confess a little bit to you and -- no -- I'm -- go ahead -- I'm..."

When the next questioner began, Gibbs said, "Are you going to make me feel bad too?"

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/01/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5356166.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well done, Helen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Guess we can add the sainted Helen Thomas to the list
Of "haters" who don't understand the intricacies of three-dimensional chess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Does she understand that Baucus bill is the only bill out there that doesn't have the public option?
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 11:13 AM by emulatorloo
People act as if the Baucus Bullshit is the ---only--- bill.

It isn't.

The others have the public option.

Much if not all of the Baucus Bullshit is going to get thrown out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. i don't know. i get no response when i point that out here. it's... almost as if...
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 11:17 AM by dionysus
get this... there just might be people here who selectively ignore things that don't conform to their "obama is a corporate tool" hogwash!

either that or they really don't understand how the house and senate bills get merged and modified in committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
73. Are you seriously accusing Helen Thomas of selectively ignoring information?
Or not understanding Washington? She knows more about this stuff than this whole board and Obama combined.She asked the same question others have been asking and she didn't get an answer and the fact she didn't is on video!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. But Obama has praised the Baucus committee's work.
Which makes the question legitimate.

Then we have the reports (posted by myself and others in this very forum) that Obama and the WH have NOT been pressing behind the scenes for the PO.

And don't feed us the line that they would not "interfere" with the committee process, since we know pressure has been applied on other maters, like the stimulus.

Obama RAN on the principle of an "accountable" government.

All Helen and the rest of us want is to know what the administration is actually up to.

It is our right and duty as citizens to ask these questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hileeopnyn8d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Maybe he praised them
because Baucus isn't the only person on that Committee, and two of the Democrats on the committee did indeed have amendments that included public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe Helen Thomas needs to read this thread:
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 11:08 AM by emulatorloo
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8681351

FARK!!! Will someone please step forward and say these simple words? by demwing

--------

"The public option is ALIVE in the Senate. Five bills have come out of conference. Four of those bills contain a public option. Only one (the Senate Finance Committee bill) does not. The Senate Democrats OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORT a public option."

The same logic applies to mandates, in the opposite. Only the Finance Committee is pushing mandates.

Why is it SO god damned hard to get this concept? A three year old can understand that 4 is more than 1, why are the media talking heads less intelligent than a three year old?

Furthermore, why is it so bloody difficult to get on board with the fact that there is NO UNIFIED SENATE BILL at this time? Of the five bills, none are final, and none spell the beginning or the end of anything permanent relating to health care reform!

Can SOMEONE get on TV and say this? When the mouthpieces start proclaiming X or Y as dead, can someone STOP THEM?

Finally, if the qualifications for being a well paid political commentator are so low, where the fuck can I get a job application?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Helen asked that same question every week. Not exactly
informative reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. I absolutely don't agree with Thomas here.
No, it is not the reporter's job to advocate a view. I'm sorry, but unless we are returning to the earliest days of American partisan journalism, that is contrary to journalism ethics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Ahh, you're right actually.
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 11:17 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
Even though I agree with Helen's sentiment, I suppose she shouldn't advocate one way or the other. Although I do think she should press Obama to clearly state his definition of a public option and whether he supports it and to what degree. The "it should bother your conscience" is a bit over the top. But the public option is of great importance to the American people, as polls show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. I think the cynical "You're never going to get it" compromised her.
And I think it was a rather jerk move in that exchange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I agree with Thomas that a yes or no answer from Gibbs would be nice
The question doesn't seem that hard to answer. It's definitely not on the same level as, say, "Does Israel have nuclear weapons?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. A simple yes or no should NOT be that difficult from Gibbs. Unless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
53. She's not advocating a view, she wants a straight answer to a question.
A good journalist should press for a straight answer like Helen is doing here. We don't need any more transcriptionists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sorry, but she's being an ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Guess we can add the sainted Helen Thomas to the list
As I said.

Ms. Thomas, meet Bil Maher, Keith Olbermann, Ed Schultz, Rachel Maddow, and the rest of those idiots who just don't get it.

It's Chess, man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Read my posts above. There are 5 bills, 4 of them have the Public Option
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 11:24 AM by emulatorloo
Baucus is not "the bill" -- there is no bill yet.

Baucus bill is bullshit and everybody knows it. It is not going to be taken seriously when the final bill is put together.

Harkin says the public option will be in the final bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. She is sick of half-answers and weasel-words
Same as it ever was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Thomas is a journalist, and should act like one.
It is not her position to advocate for or against any particular legislation.

The others you mention are political commentators and entertainers and as such can say whatever they feel like saying.

There is a difference, and there should remain a difference if one is to still be considered a journalist, and not a cheerleader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. She IS acting like one.
She is holding the administration accountable.

That is a journalist's job.

It is NOT to be a stenographer for Mr. Gibbs.

It is to probe, continually, and demand answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Yes, she is a journalist and a great one at that!
She is doing her job..you just are in shock because there has been so little of the main stream journalists doing their jobs correctly for many years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. If a journalist isn't making capitulators feel uncomfortable...
... then they aren't doing their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
46. I'm glad Mark Twain disagreed with that notion.
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 05:25 PM by Dr Fate
Could you imagine if there had been no journalists who opposed slavery, for instance? How about the journalists during the Vietnam era who openly opposed the war? Boy, we coulda used one or two of those a few years back. Oh well.

Helen, as a REAL journalist might do- demanded a STRAIGHT answer- not more of the same old weasle words.

Maybe you are so used to the state of "journalism" under Bush that you forgot what the crusading journalist archetype even looks like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. I guess she feels she's earned the right
to be a disingenuous ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. She has earned the right to be treated with respect
Being called an "Ass" by some people here could be considered evidence that she is, in fact, doing her job.

Comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Then she should stop with her
disingenuousness then..this isn't the first time.

I like Helen Thomas but she's not too impressive at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #42
74. Funny.When she questioned Bush , she was a heroine and we sent her roses
Somehow you feel she doesn't have the right to question Obama? Why doesn't Gibbs answer the question? Because he doesn't want to commit Obama to taking a stand? Sheesh.I thought Obama was all about transparency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #42
77. It is rude to refuse to directly answer a direct question
and Gibbs is rude like mad, to an elder who could teach him a few things if he was not such a Gibbs loving ego fiend. He is evasive and it is rude to ask for questions and then prance about refusing to answer. Pretending that a non answer is an answer is simply a giant lie on Gibbs' part. A giant rude lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #42
81. Well, she's no friend to the corporate sell-outs in the White House..
Which makes her a hero to me (and the American public), but an enemy and an "ass" to the apologists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
45. She's just demanding a STRAIGHT answer for a change.
I guess that makes me an ass too. So be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
50. Obama called Rockefeller to tell him to support Baucus bill, without a public option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #50
82. Thanks for link. I hope Sen Rockefeller stands up and votes NO.
This misshapen monstrosity needs to be stopped now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. "A visibly flustered Gibbs..." he was NOT flustered. It was a light atmosphere...
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 11:23 AM by jenmito
they were joking back and forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. Sorry, Helen is not an ass . . .
she really wants to know where the White House stands on this issue and so do I.

What I'd like to know is . . . in the oft touted rope-a-dope scenario . . . who's the dope? It may be the lefties and middleclass voters who hoped Obama would actually go to bat for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. She's prognosticating; totally inappropriate
Not to mention off the mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. I appreciate what Helen is doing
She knows what the Democratic Party has traditionally stood and fought for. I have not written negatively of Obama because it is possible that he is waiting for the best strategic moment to push hard for a strong public option. It is also possible that he will sit back and just take credit for whatever Congress delivers, even if that is only with a fig leaf of a public shadow option included. I wil NOT stay quiet if it is the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. If we get a "public option"
I can guarantee it won't be what you think it will be or what you want it to be. The lobbyists will make sure of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
21. Helen Thomas is my hero.
Seriously... the chick rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. Nice to watch a truth-seeker at work! k&r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. K&R...
Thank You, Helen.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. "Because I want your conscience to bother you." = AWESOME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. Go Helen!
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 03:40 PM by Dinger
God love her, she's a badass!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
90. Yeah - DU was happy to send her roses when she questioned Fleischer et al
Duers can be so hypocritical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hope This Doesn't Make Helen "Bad" Now
You know what I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Didn't you read above?
She's a bad journalist now...and an "ass"...

It's really amazing.

But not surprizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. Luckily, four out of five bills in Congress include a public option
Party of No bills




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. None of the bills contain a public option that is strong enough
to keep the for profit monsters in line. No where near choosing medicare if you want it.
Minor technicality.

I'm sure Helen gets that too. I hope she keeps after them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. And the poster gets a cigar!!
Even the BEST bills are pitifully weak.

Baucus' is just the worst of a pretty bad lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. "Has the president given up on the PO?" versus
"Has the president given up on the 'strong enough' PO?"

Keep moving the goal posts. It will not be long before these questions become irrelevant. It's a wonder they haven't already.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #43
75. Now Helen is irrelevent too? It was a simple question. it should have been answered.
Helen Thomas NEVER asks irrelevent questions and has more knowledge of dc and its politcal machine thyan anyone on this board.She didn't move any goalposts.She has asked the same question over and over.Still no answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #75
86. So.. they either HAVE no answer.. OR don't want us to KNOW the answer...
Where is that much-promised "Accountability"....?

Just another slogan I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #36
71. Don't know what all bills have but at least one uses medicare rates and
one medicare +5%.

It would be less confusing to call it buy into medicare...but since the premiums have to pay for cost of public I don't know how that would be worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. Helen Thomas has been and will always be a great journalist
And a great American.

She is doing her job, and it pisses off the "how dare you" crowd, which only proves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
38. I wished more people would tell them that, and do not stop at Gibbs and Obama, Go after Reid, Baucus
and co.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. Good! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
44. "have you taken your meds today Miss Helen?"
.... would be my response.

Is she there to gather information .... or promote her political agenda?

If Major Garret behaved like she does we'd tear him to pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. LOL! I LIKE Journalists who promote a Liberal political agenda.
LOL! She *IS* gathering information- now we all know that Gibbs cant give a straight answer on the PO- that in itself is a wealth of info.

You can learn more from what a politican refuses to say when they are caught off guard than you can from their prepared spin & remarks.

Thanks for the helpful knowledge, Helen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. But does it work the same way for the conservatives?
It's my understanding that there are two schools of thought among beltway journos. Those who chase the brass ring of "journalistic integrity" which seems to me too much like an impossible Utopian ideal. The others who feel it's their personal responsibility to call the WH onto the carpet when they deem necessary. They're doing it "for the people" so to speak.

Sure, it's all well and good when we agree with them .... but what about when we dont? If some wingnut reporter gets it in their head that the President is trying use this health care bill as method by which to allow the flood gates to open allowing teen-aged girls to get 14 abortions a day is that ok? Is he not seeking information? Wrong and twisted though it may be?

But it's not so much the point Helen's trying to make .... if she did it rarely I dont think it would bother me. It's the same blurted out question (when she's not called on) day after day after day. It reminds me too much of that classic definition of insanity. The WH values her opinion .... but no more than yours or mine. We're all voters pure and simple. Bless her, but one woman shouting the same question in the briefing room day after day isn't going to get a thing done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #48
65. You are so right!
That little exchange spoke volumes in itself. But there are none so blind as those who will not see..........

I think she sees the PO as DOA, and wants the public to know it, so that they can try to turn it around before it is too late!

I can't help thinking about all the sheeple that were willing to follow Bush off the cliff..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. More Kool-Aid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Sure, want to loan me some of yours?
Because you and I both know you have some, stashed WAY back in the back of the fridge and saved for 2012, when things aren't so cushy and that Palin woman is running around as the GOP nominee with a rifle on her hip shouting about how Der Fuhrer is gonna kill all the babies unless we stop him!!!

Now now Indiana, going at one another with wingnut mud slinging does NOT become us. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
66. She's had it on an intravenous drip since she arrived here.
It's much better that way--no risk of accidentally putting down the cup for a moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. For a journalist to demand answers is "promoting a political agenda"?
How Bush-like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Oh sure, she's just demanding the WH fall in line with something the entire country...
... unanimously supports. Please.

Now whether the entire country SHOULD support it is clear. I support it, I'm sure you do to. But we all have opinions on the matter, I've got an opinion, you've got an opinion, Mitch McConnell has an opinion, etc. etc. Helen is just one of us and she has her own opinion, she's just lucky to have a front row seat.

If she wants Gibbs (and presumably the President's) consciences to bother them, then it's clear she has an answer in mind she wants him to give.

To pose a question, loaded as it may be, to the press sec. and report the answer to the public is one thing. To continuously berate the press sec. until he gives her the answer she wants .... or to try cause the WH to act the way she wants by using her position and proximity to the President, is quite another.

Again, if this were a Fox news reporter we would be LIVID.

One reporter shouting from the front row wont do a thing. If she wants to accomplish something, keep writing as well as I know she can and get the consciences of the American PEOPLE to bother them ... stir up the ire of those whos position matters most (the voters) and her problem will solve itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #60
68. I think it's a straight answer she wanted, & the "conscience" part was partly about how he weaseled
out of the question. Watch the tape--he refuses to give her a straight answer. That's because his conscience and by proxy Obama's, won't allow them to give us a straight answer on the public option.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. lol, no, the United States Congress wont allow it.....
..... he's not writing the bill ... 'cause that method doesn't work. So he's not going to publicly commit to such a controversial .... and I dont care what you want to whip out, it's controversial .... matter when he doesn't have direct control over the votes.

Sausage my friend, political sausage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #57
80. Journalists were supposed to stop asking questions last Jan. 20, at about noon.
Too bad nobody told Helen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
47. Jeez! How plain can it be that he is evading a very direct question.
Bravo Helen! Keep it up until he answers you, yes or no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. His non-answers are as informative as anything. That's what a good journalist does...
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 05:32 PM by Dr Fate
...they ask questions that will inform you no matter how the politician answers them.

I can learn more from a NON answer to a so called "tough" question than a prepared answer from a "polite" question.

Jesus folks- it's not like she even asked him a tough or controversial question- EVERYONE wants to know the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
52. Great job, Helen. Give em hell! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
54. The so-called "journalists" today could learn a lot from Helen Thomas.
I have the utmost respect and admiration for this woman. She has been right there for decades questioning elected officials and holding their feet to the fire.

I am glad Helen is front and center pressing Gibbs about the public option every day. We deserve a straight answer on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. People Here Didn't Bitch When She Took The giggling murderer To Task
It wasn't her "political agenda" then, was it? That fucking bastard ran from Helen, as well he should have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Precisely....
..... because the giggling murder (and I presume you're talking about * ) was a fool who put his own interest over that of the American people. Barack Obama has done more in 8 months to improve the lives of his citizens than George Bush has done in a lifetime.

You'll forgive me if I'd like to see a better President get little better treatment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. You'll Forgive Me If I'd Like To See Helen get A Little Better Treatment Too
And there is no comparison of * to President Obama, none, not by me, not ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Good, you were starting to scare me a bit there Dinger....
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 07:17 PM by Clio the Leo
.... lol and as for the matter of respect. I was taught, and I suspect Ms. Thomas was too ... you gotta give it to get it.


For cryin' out loud! He gave the woman a cupcake! What more does she want! A pony!!!? A cupcake with a PONY on it?!!!! :)



Of course I laughed at the time because she had THE MAN standing in front of her and yet didn't manage to demand an answer of him like she does of Gibbs every day.

Well of course not, that would have been RUDE! Conscience testing always yields to cupcakes. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #63
78. In the Christian faith
Respect for one's elders is taught, along with clarity of speech. Spin is not allowed. "Let your yes be yes, and your no be no." So when Helen is asking for an actual answer, and being given bs by some younger and less experienced person, what would Jesus say about that? Or does any of that matter really? Is is just an accessory to be worn like a tee shirt, not a real faith that is practiced.
Let your yes be yes. Let your no be no.
Matthew 5:37 "let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil."
What do you do with those verses when you take up the defense of weasel words condemned by the Christ? This is why I laugh at all those 'faith folks' and Obama's claims of religion. They do not bear the fruits of that faith, in fact, they seem to mock the most basic principles of that faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #61
92. Yes, President Obama has earned respect and
this isn't the first time Helen Thomas has been disingenuous. This is from a rw wing slime board but what's the difference?

<snip>

“It feels like the concept of a town hall, I think, is to have an open public forum. And this sounds like a very tightly controlled audience and list of questions. Why do it that way?” asked Reid.

White House press secretary Richard Gibbs deflected the question, but that only raised the ire of Helen Thomas, UPI’s veteran correspondent who has long been at the top of the White House press corps totem pole.

“We have never had that in the White House,” Thomas said, referring to the degree that press events are pre-scripted in the Obama administration. “I’m amazed, I’m amazed at you peole who called for openness and transparency…”

http://www.therightreasons.net/index.php?showtopic=15072

I'm sorry but that's being a disingenous asshole. I guess one is never too old or too venerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #61
93. You'll forgive me if I expect the press to hold elected officials
accountable - no matter who they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
58. This is a great thing to forward on facebook, btw. Wake up your kool aid drinking friends.
Many who aren't paying attention don't realize the lackluster fight Obama has put up for the public option, and this exchange crystallizes the President's lack of commitment on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
64. God bless
Helen Thomas. There just aren't many like her around today.........

I can't stand the bashers or the suck-ups!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
67. Helen Thomas is an enemy of the people. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #67
95. Did you miss the sarcasm smilie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
70. Helen is a national treasure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
72. To Helen's detractors: she was being a journalist here
Edited on Sat Oct-03-09 04:42 AM by DFW
I know her well enough. She wants a press secretary's conscience to bother him if he won't come out with a straight
answer. She had gone though the same shit with Nixon's liar, Ron Ziegler. She recognizes when a press secretary is
deliberately avoiding answering a question when it's uncomfortable.


"Has the president given up on the public option?" Thomas asked, prompting Gibbs to suggest she asks the question every day.

"I ask it day after day because it has great meaning in this country, and you never answer it," Thomas said.

"I apparently don't answer it to your satisfaction," Gibbs said with a smile, prompting Thomas to say, "that's right."

She wants his conscience to bother him because he hasn't answered her simple question with a simple answer. She is not
demanding he (or Obama) give the answer she prefers. All she wants is a straight answer to a straightforward question
that everybody in this country wants the answer to. If the White House won't do that, so we can know where they stand,
I want their conscience to bother them too.

"Has the president given up on the public option?" What's wrong with either "yes" or "no?" Don't tell me that Helen and I
and the supportive posts on this thread are the only people in America who feel that way. Her comment was justified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
76. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
79. Helen Thomas is teh AWESOME. most def
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyldRogue Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
83. It is a shame...
...that there are some Du'ers that essentially equated Helen as an ass and other things. Maybe she should just give up her seat to one of you that will NEVER challenge anyone with a straight-forward question but would instead type word for word whatever BS diatribe that is spoken as FACT.

It's a shame that so many are being dis-respectful to her. And sorry, just because Obama gave her a cupcake doesn't mean his Administration gets a free pass on a straight-forward question. Gibbs could not/would not answer because maybe the bill that finally passes will NOT have PO or SPO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
84. Thank you, Helen. Thank you.
We owe you a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
85. Helen wants a straight answer. The WH does not have one.
These are FACTS.

That is what her recurring questioning is all about.

Got it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
87. yup, she ran her boat up on the shoals.
She poured her integrity into the sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
88. Kicking for Helen Thomas, hero of the people. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. Me Too Freddie : ) (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #89
94. And me
Thanks, Helen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
96. K&R! Keep it up Helen!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
97. I WANTT MY FLOWRES BACK!1!1!!!1!!11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC