|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 06:57 AM Original message |
WH hands out White coats for Docs who forgot them for the photo-0p |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. Well, if it's in the NY Post, it HAS to be accurate, true, and without spin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
41. ...and relevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. Matt Drudge and Rupert Murdoch thank you for promoting this red herring non-story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. The money for those jackets could have bought some visits for people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Really? How much did they spend on a few white jackets? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:19 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I am serious. It was an expensive and un-necessary photo op. Perhaps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
25. OMG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
77. I am not willing to settle for 'any' legislation just to pass a bill. And |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #77 |
99. Yeah, you're holding out for single payer - though that won't happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:13 AM Response to Reply #12 |
27. "just repeating WH talking points"???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:31 AM Response to Reply #27 |
46. I know, that's a weird statement. Is the WH not supposed to have a message, now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:31 AM Response to Reply #27 |
48. As I listened I heard no new information. Perhaps you did?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
73. You're repeating Free Republic/Republican talking points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #73 |
98. I do not visit that site so I would not know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
63. You're so interested in having the president fail that you can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
93. Not much. I'm required to have 2 lab coats for school. They're cheap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
106. "Woman! Your fine ointments! Brand new! And expensive! Could have been saved for the poor.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:42 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. For the record... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Your attempt at shuting down conversation with your post is a FAIL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:19 AM Response to Reply #13 |
36. What conversation? You didn't contribute a word before jefferson_dem posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:35 AM Response to Reply #36 |
49. Using that phase was not intended to be divisive. I simply meant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:31 PM Response to Reply #49 |
62. I don't care if you like murdoch or not ..you are a fan of Epic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:53 PM Response to Reply #62 |
74. Shows what you know *not much*. anyway, have a nice day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #74 |
80. Riiiight..What I KNOW is that you're always pushing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
42. See below: Conversation continues.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a kennedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
3. right, and this is from the NY Post..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:07 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Who is handing out the white coats? Just asking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. That's it? That's all the right wing smear-merchants have to counter the message of reform? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:21 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I do not visit his sites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
33. Where did the Shrub get his flight suit from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
4. A Mad as Hell doc who crashed the photo op said similar things on Ed Schultz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. I missed his show but thanks for the post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
64. Oh good, he, the nypost, drudge, you, the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
6. How is this "botched" as the Post claims? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
28. But there was a difference between Bush's event and Obama's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:27 AM Response to Reply #28 |
44. Yup, that's the correct analogy. Not that the media cares. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 09:17 AM Response to Reply #44 |
50. True the media as a whole was negligent or complict in a character assassination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hileeopnyn8d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #50 |
65. Ugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #50 |
90. The election of 2004...everytime I think about it, I'm gobsmacked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 03:19 PM Response to Reply #90 |
96. It even hit me recently, at a hearing on Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #28 |
70. That's an excellent analogy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
67. And, coming from the notorious AP..who cares what they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
7. Trolling for NY Post clips to try and make Obama look bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:09 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Give it up. I am not trolling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 10:10 AM Response to Reply #9 |
54. Yes, you are. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 11:43 AM Response to Reply #54 |
59. you are wrong also. Have a good day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:54 PM Response to Reply #59 |
75. The non-trolls agree unanimously: you are trolling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #75 |
84. Obviously something's going on here - and it's NOT about the substance of the NewsCorp hit piece. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:04 PM Response to Reply #84 |
105. OP has violated the 11th commandment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
78. And there is nothing subtle about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:23 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. President Obama, et. al., are in the process of doing THAT - looking bad - THEMSELVES. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Ooh, look at those two responses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:12 AM Response to Reply #17 |
26. LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:34 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yes, I think the WH advisors blew it on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hileeopnyn8d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:00 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Well there's a surprise! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:19 AM Response to Reply #18 |
37. Why do you feel the need to parrot the points outlined in your OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
66. That's means they didn't then..bc you just push for fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
68. He'll never run out of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:48 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. I know...just look at him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
19. I am OUTRAGED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quantass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
20. Why the fuss...makes perfect sense to me...Image is everything. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
21. That's funny, as younger doctors don't wear them because of germs. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
22. Handed out or not, the lab coats in the Rose Garden did look odd - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:19 AM Response to Reply #22 |
35. The only way this would be reminiscent of the fake turkey photo op is if these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
69. You're comparing a fake turkey to real doctors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
24. um, ok. elevens?11! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
29. At leasT they were real doctors and actually save lives. They forgot their coats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
30. It IS a photo op. And... so? Politics, especially Presidential politics, is theater. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
31. This is the latest poutrage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
32. I thought the photo op was inept, unrealistic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:20 AM Response to Reply #32 |
40. While I don't agree, "inept" could be used to describe it. "Unrealistic" -- NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BklnDem75 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
34. What!?! I can't believe this!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:19 AM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Wake up! The OP is trying to manufacture some outrage! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:20 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Duplicate. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
43. Well DUH..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
45. The white house has to sell policy 365 days a year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
47. I don't care if they are in their pajamas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
51. That is a bullshit article, full of repuke tripe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 10:33 AM Response to Reply #51 |
57. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
52. The responses here are pretty funny .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #52 |
85. So you're the consistent one, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
53. This is HUGH! I'm SERIES!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
55. Interesting post on GD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 10:27 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. and I agree with Hochfeld regarding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 11:53 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Yep, pretty telling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
58. Those were probably the "white coats" left over from when the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
61. Well, haven't you outted yourself, joeycola..you and the nypost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #61 |
72. The usual trolls and PUMAs are in here expressing their 'concern' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #72 |
83. This OP is pretty transparent, but can we drop the PUMA meme... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:20 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. Most people who voted for Hillary in the primaries are 100% cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #83 |
92. Exactly with the.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
76. IMPEACH OBAMA! He gave out white coats to REAL DOCTORS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:14 PM Response to Reply #76 |
82. Who do those guys think they are? Doctors?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:20 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. I KNOW, right?! Jeez! How DARE the doctors be given doctor jackets! What phonies! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:23 PM Response to Reply #87 |
91. I'm no fan of publicity shots like this...but the outrage is just way over the top. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. "So the outrage is what? That they are made to look more doctor-y?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
79. Obama is dead to me now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
81. Quick! Bring out the smelling salts and the fainting couches! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:21 PM Response to Reply #81 |
89. Don't Look Now! It's... "whitelabcoatgate"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-07-09 01:03 AM Response to Reply #89 |
108. Speak Truth to Power! Sometimes doctors don't wear lab coats! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
86. what a waste of good bandwidth. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
95. You deserve a rec for bringing on the comedy. What a magnificient FAIL, this was. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
97. seriously lame op |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
100. Oh, Looky Here..a X post from GD from a Doctor who was there.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
101. Yawn. Another cut-and -paste Obama hater using right-wing sources. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
102. FYI: Feel nice cozying up to Glenn Beck? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 06:17 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. Here's a video of the Doctors who attended who have something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-06-09 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
104. The New York Post is a super super credible source of information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC