Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate moderates echo GOP call for 72-hour disclosure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 04:04 PM
Original message
Senate moderates echo GOP call for 72-hour disclosure
Senate moderates echo GOP call for 72-hour disclosure

As the health care reform bill moves to the Senate floor, a key bloc of moderate Senate Democrats and an independent called on Senate Majority Leader Reid to increase the process' transparency.

Specifically, the senators called on Reid to post legislative text and CBO scores online 72 hours before the first floor vote. They asked that all amendments be posted before debate begins. And the amended bill and CBO score should be posted three days before a final Senate vote and before the Senate votes on a conference committee report.

Democratic Sens. Blanche Lincoln, Evan Bayh, Mary Landrieu, Claire McCaskill, Ben Nelson, Mark Pryor, Jim Webb and Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman signed the letter.

"As their democratically-elected representatives in Washington, D.C., it is our duty to listen to their concerns and to provide them with the chance to respond to proposals that will impact their lives," the senators wrote. "At a time when trust in Congress and the U.S. government is unprecedentedly low, we can begin to rebuild the American people's faith in their federal government through transparency and by actively inviting Americans to participate in the legislative process."

Republicans fought for a similar three-day waiting period before the Senate Finance Committee voted on its proposal, but their amendment was shot down because it would have delayed a vote by a week or two.

But with the success of reform hanging on this group of moderate Dems, it will not be as easy for Reid to dismiss their concerns, even if it delays each part of the process by a week or more.

Read the whole letter after the jump.

<SNIP>

October 6, 2009

The Honorable Harry Reid
Senate Majority Leader
S-221 United States Capitol
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Leader Reid:

As you know, Americans across our country have been actively engaged in the debate on health care reform. Whether or not our constituents agree with the direction of the debate, many are frustrated and lacking accurate information on the emerging proposals in Congress. Without a doubt, reforming health care in America is one of the most monumental and far-reaching undertakings considered by this body in decades. We believe the American public's participation in this process is critical to our overall success of creating a bill that lowers health care costs and offers access to quality and affordable health care for all Americans.

Every step of the process needs to be transparent, and information regarding the bill needs to be readily available to our constituents before the Senate starts to vote on legislation that will affect the lives of every American. The legislative text and complete budget scores from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) of the health care legislation considered on the Senate floor should be made available on a website the public can access for at least 72 hours prior to the first vote to proceed to the legislation. Likewise, the legislative text and complete CBO scores of the health care legislation as amended should be made available to the public for 72 hours prior to the vote on final passage of the bill in the Senate. Further, the legislative text of all amendments filed and offered for debate on the Senate floor should be posted on a public website prior to beginning debate on the amendment on the Senate floor. Lastly, upon a final agreement between the House of Representatives and the Senate, a formal conference report detailing the agreement and complete CBO scores of the agreement should be made available to the public for 72 hours prior to the vote on final passage of the conference report in the Senate.

By publically posting the legislation and its CBO scores 72 hours before it is brought to a vote in the Senate and by publishing the text of amendments before they are debated, our constituents will have the opportunity to evaluate these policies and communicate their concerns or their message of support to their Members of Congress. As their democratically-elected representatives in Washington, D.C., it is our duty to listen to their concerns and to provide them with the chance to respond to proposals that will impact their lives. At a time when trust in Congress and the U.S. government is unprecedentedly low, we can begin to rebuild the American people's faith in their federal government through transparency and by actively inviting Americans to participate in the legislative process.

We respectfully request that you agree to these principles before moving forward with floor debate of this legislation. We appreciate your serious consideration and look forward to working with you on health care reform legislation in the weeks ahead.

Sincerely,

Senator Blanche L. Lincoln

Senator Evan Bayh

Senator Mary L. Landrieu

Senator Joseph I. Lieberman

Senator Claire McCaskill

Senator Ben Nelson

Senator Mark L. Pryor

Senator Jim Webb

http://www.politico.com/livepulse/1009/Senate_moderates_echo_GOP_call_for_72hour_disclosure_.html?showall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. DINO'S one and all...what a fuckin surprise...
Edited on Tue Oct-06-09 04:07 PM by truebrit71
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And what exactly is wrong with having 72 hours to look at a bill???
Why would anyone oppose this unless they wanted to hide something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. delete.
Edited on Tue Oct-06-09 05:42 PM by Mass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why do the plebians need to look at legislation?
It isn't like Congress is going to take their wishes into consideration anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Because they want the lobbyists to be able to read the bill. They do not care about the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. I could argue that McCaskill, Webb, and pryor MIGHT be moderates
the rest are cons and all of them are slow walking this into the dust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. This is to buy time for the lobbyist to fuck up the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. well I'm sure this has always been the rule because Republicans are so trustworthy thru the years

extreme sarc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC