|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:20 PM Original message |
Leaderless: Senate Pushes For Public Option Without Obama's Support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. WH denied this Friday evening.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. And this article specifically disputes that denial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Wish It Had A Source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. "multiple Democratic sources" not good enough. I've read 'some say' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 01:01 AM Response to Reply #9 |
25. The Source Is Reporting What Obama Is Thinking, Not What He Is Saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. So you're calling Dan Pfeiffer a liar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Unless it's Seymour Hirsch's unnamed sources. He does it well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. lol, is he going to tell us next that Barack Obama is funneling money to al qaeda? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. His denial was as unspecific as it gets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpartanDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Valerie Jarret made a more specific denial that day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. That was then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. So was your article...what's the point?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Not as "unspecific" as the unnamed sources in the BS article you are trying to sell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. His vague denial speaks for itself. It left plenty of wiggle room. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Sigh... new to the ways of Washington, or think the rules no longer apply? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 04:49 AM Response to Reply #1 |
28. It's funny, but this crap article has been posted at least 4 times, and not once.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 07:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
37. ha ha. That 'denial' is a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. More Huffington Post crap. Who needs Drudge when Huff Post will do their job for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Go2Peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 05:39 AM Response to Reply #7 |
30. Hmm... Amazing, Someone else is posting the same thing in another op |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. More multiple unnamed sources can kiss my ass. Won't buy a story with that in it, EVER again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quantass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-24-09 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
17. Hmm..doesnt seem to fit Obama to be honest...He isn't stupid to pass up an opt-out for a trigger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolphindance (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
18. Dude, I'm tried of your anti-Obama BS. Unrecced. (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 12:09 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. +1. This too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
19. WE'RE DOOOMED! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
20. Debunked from my unnamed source who hates their unnamed source and secret staffers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercurrent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
23. "White House source" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ind_thinker2 (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
24. It is possible Insurance co's are unnamed source, they want to create a progressive revolt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
26. this article revealed itself as BS the instant it implied Obama was siding with Big Insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWebHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 02:01 AM Response to Original message |
27. not sure why there's such unified denial about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 05:07 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. To what do you attribute your particular brand of psychic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 05:47 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. S/he could be a conservadem...which means Repub masquerading.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 05:45 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Obama didn't attach himself to Snowe. Baucus did. You sound like a Repub. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 07:35 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Rahm (aka the WH) has aggressively been courting Snowe and you know it or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 07:36 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Nope... I don't know that. Do you have a secret senate source too? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 07:37 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Google is up and running. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Go2Peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-25-09 05:50 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. "Get ours"? Access to healthcare for everyone is not "getting ours" now that we have a democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC