ncteechur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-27-09 09:43 PM
Original message |
So does President Obama really want the trigger over the opt out? |
|
Is he just freakin' obsessed with faux bipartisanship because only 1 repub doesn't = bipartisanship. Or am I just paranoid after this long drama.
I trust the president but if this is true, it is a real disappointment.
Is this just Politico bs??
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-27-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Now, we all disagree on what's a good bill and what isn't .... but since he's the duely elected President of the United States, he gets to be .... ya know .... the decider and all.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-27-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And that's a real problem for everyone involved except the Administration.
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-27-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Did Obama say that he wanted the trigger over the Opt Out? |
|
Cause I've heard unnamed sources saying that, but I haven't heard him say it. Have you?
|
SPedigrees
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-27-09 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. That was Politico's and Fox's fictional account. Obama is in favor of a public option and is happy |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-27-09 11:02 PM by SPedigrees
with the opt-out version in Harry Reid's Senate bill.
|
ind_thinker2
(259 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-27-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Because he knew LIEberman will not vote for and he had a backup in Snowe |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |