Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times: Dean's Odds? Surely, 50-50

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 05:22 AM
Original message
NY Times: Dean's Odds? Surely, 50-50
Dean's Odds? Surely, 50-50

WHETHER you consider a half-century of history or listen to the claims of his rivals, it looks as if Howard Dean has a 50-50 shot at winning the Democratic presidential nomination in July.

Since 1952, Democrats have tried 10 times to put a new president in office. (We're not counting the campaigns of 1964, 1980 and 1996, when the Democrats renominated an incumbent president.) In 5 of those 10 campaigns, the candidate leading in the national polls in January, like Dr. Dean, went on to win the nomination: Adlai E. Stevenson in 1956, John F. Kennedy in 1960, Walter F. Mondale in 1984, Bill Clinton in 1992, Al Gore in 2000.

The other half of the front-runners did not make it. In January 1952, Estes Kefauver was favored by nine percentage points over President Harry S. Truman, but after Mr. Truman withdrew, the Democratic nomination went to Mr. Stevenson. Heading into the 1968 campaign, Robert F. Kennedy and President Lyndon B. Johnson were essentially tied for first, but after Mr. Johnson dropped out and Mr. Kennedy was assassinated, the nomination went to Hubert H. Humphrey.

more...

Dean's Odds? Surely, 50-50

Free Registration Required
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. My guess, even with all the GOP talk ,it is 50/50
My reasons are this, if your interested. The country is 50/50 right down to state houses and their bodies. We really took more of the 2000 pop. vote and college vote was really very iffy. If the people in Fa had voted right Gore would have taken that state.The people who love war and all that will be counter acted for by the anti-war and jobs going out of country people and war dead. Also this stepping onto taking rights has two sides in both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually..
considering Gore votes and Nader votes totalled together, there is an argument to be made that this nation has the potential to turn leftward nicely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'd say 9-11 produced enough conservatism to even it out
it got people listening to talk radio and watching cable news, which means alot of new conservatives, and dems who became independants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another factor:
I can't locate the thread right now, but in the last several decades, the candidate who led in fundraising as of 1/1/YearXXXX has always gone on to secure the nomination.

50/50? At least...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. that is true
the only other exception to that precedent occured in the Democratic primaries of 1968.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC