rockymountaindem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-16-04 08:41 PM
Original message |
Were the TANG documents forged or not? |
|
I haven't really been following this, and what I do hear is higly contradictory. What's the deal?
|
dennis4868
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-16-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the official (and undisputed) government records show that Bush was AWOL from the Texas, Alabama and Mass. national guard and lied on his National Guard forms....
|
EthanAllenVt
(66 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-16-04 08:45 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Last I heard they were "reassembled" |
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-16-04 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No, I doubt they were forged... |
|
They are not "originals" perhaps, but they are not "fake" either. They are real and the source has just not been discovered yet. But I don't think they were forged. There will be a logical explanation for this...
|
alcuno
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-16-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I'm so confused. All I know is that * failed to do his duty. |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 08:56 PM by alcuno
The interesting thing about the 86 year old secretary was her saying something about them looking similar to documents that she had typed. Unless I heard her wrong. The plot thickens.
And Rather reasserted that they came from Killian's "personal file." A file that the family says he didn't have but the secretary says he did have.
|
Generator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-16-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It's a riddle wrapped in an enigma dressed like |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message |