Are Kerry & Edwards & the Dem surrogates going to repeat "two-faced"

[Lex]

about Bush a lot in the coming weeks in order to reinforce our guerilla tactics with the posters?

Am I allowed to ask this or is it impudent?

[Guaranteed]

1. It's not impudent,

it just might be a little early to ask in public.

[Lex]

2. Oh, my bad.

"Nevermind." (in Emily Latella's voice from Sat. Night Live)

[troubleinwinter]

3. I am unhappy about the "two faced" graphic project.

Maybe I am the only one.

But some folks are all energized about putting these things everywhere. TAKING AWAY energy that is better spent on actually working for Kerry & Edwards. Registering voters, going door to door. Working phones. Etc., etc. etc.

All to put energy into what seems to me to be a pointless waste on a graphic that does not get the message out clearly. It does not explain where the candidates stand on important issues, and will get us nothing.

I cannot see how this graphic is going to sway anyone at all.

When it first appeared here, many people did not know what to make of it or its meaning, until it was labeled 'two faced'.

Personally, I will continue to explain where the candidates differ on vital issues, and will not bother with a mystery graphic.

I guess it may be 'fun', but it is not important, in my book.

[troubleinwinter]

4. Lex,

I probly just stole the "impudence" trophy from ya!

[Nite Owl]

5. But what this can do is get

people to ask questions, to start a discussion and actually think about what they are about to do. It's something that can be done on the run, while going out shopping so it shouldn't really take away time from other things.